Good or bad? : students’ perspectives on software quality

People interact with various software daily. This includes software that they choose to use and software that they must use because of their work or other circumstances. Companies often require their customers to use their software for their services, such as online banking and public transportation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hrefna Namfa Finnsdóttir 1996-
Other Authors: Háskólinn í Reykjavík
Format: Master Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1946/47683
_version_ 1821694138540621824
author Hrefna Namfa Finnsdóttir 1996-
author2 Háskólinn í Reykjavík
author_facet Hrefna Namfa Finnsdóttir 1996-
author_sort Hrefna Namfa Finnsdóttir 1996-
collection Skemman (Iceland)
description People interact with various software daily. This includes software that they choose to use and software that they must use because of their work or other circumstances. Companies often require their customers to use their software for their services, such as online banking and public transportation apps. This underscores the importance of developing high-quality software, which is not a simple task. To achieve this, it is crucial to understand which quality attributes to focus on in development. User involvement has been shown to contribute to high-quality software. Thus, gathering user perspectives on important quality attributes is valuable. Given the limited research on software quality attributes from users' perspectives, this study provides new insights into what quality attributes users consider important for well- and badly-designed software. Data was collected from an assignment in the Software Requirements and Design course at Reykjavik University. In the assignment, students named three well-designed and three badly designed software systems, websites, and apps, along with reasons for their opinions. These submissions were organized, categorized, and analyzed. The findings revealed Spotify, Discord, and YouTube as top choices for well-designed software, while Piazza, Klappið (an app for public buses in Reykjavík), and Facebook were most frequently cited as badly designed. The study identified that to create high-quality software, developers should prioritize usability, functionality, and user interface design. This is done by selecting relevant features that are efficient and reliable while ensuring an organized, simple, and easy-to-use interface. Fólk er í samskiptum við allskonar hugbúnað daglega. Þar á meðal hugbúnað sem þau velja sjálf að nota og hugbúnað sem þau þurfa að nota vegna vinnu sinna eða annarra aðstæðna. Fyrirtæki krefjast oft þess að viðskiptavinir þeirra noti hugbúnað fyrir þjónustu sína, til dæmis í bankaviðskiptum og samgöngum. Þetta undirstrikar mikilvægi þess að þróa hágæða ...
format Master Thesis
genre Reykjavík
Reykjavik University
genre_facet Reykjavík
Reykjavik University
geographic Reykjavík
Vinnu
geographic_facet Reykjavík
Vinnu
id ftskemman:oai:skemman.is:1946/47683
institution Open Polar
language English
long_lat ENVELOPE(8.669,8.669,62.665,62.665)
op_collection_id ftskemman
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/1946/47683
publishDate 2024
record_format openpolar
spelling ftskemman:oai:skemman.is:1946/47683 2025-01-17T00:29:54+00:00 Good or bad? : students’ perspectives on software quality Góð eða slæm? : sjónarmið notenda um gæði hugbúnaðar Hrefna Namfa Finnsdóttir 1996- Háskólinn í Reykjavík 2024-06 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1946/47683 en eng http://hdl.handle.net/1946/47683 Tölvunarfræði Meistaraprófsritgerðir Computer science Thesis Master's 2024 ftskemman 2024-06-18T14:24:10Z People interact with various software daily. This includes software that they choose to use and software that they must use because of their work or other circumstances. Companies often require their customers to use their software for their services, such as online banking and public transportation apps. This underscores the importance of developing high-quality software, which is not a simple task. To achieve this, it is crucial to understand which quality attributes to focus on in development. User involvement has been shown to contribute to high-quality software. Thus, gathering user perspectives on important quality attributes is valuable. Given the limited research on software quality attributes from users' perspectives, this study provides new insights into what quality attributes users consider important for well- and badly-designed software. Data was collected from an assignment in the Software Requirements and Design course at Reykjavik University. In the assignment, students named three well-designed and three badly designed software systems, websites, and apps, along with reasons for their opinions. These submissions were organized, categorized, and analyzed. The findings revealed Spotify, Discord, and YouTube as top choices for well-designed software, while Piazza, Klappið (an app for public buses in Reykjavík), and Facebook were most frequently cited as badly designed. The study identified that to create high-quality software, developers should prioritize usability, functionality, and user interface design. This is done by selecting relevant features that are efficient and reliable while ensuring an organized, simple, and easy-to-use interface. Fólk er í samskiptum við allskonar hugbúnað daglega. Þar á meðal hugbúnað sem þau velja sjálf að nota og hugbúnað sem þau þurfa að nota vegna vinnu sinna eða annarra aðstæðna. Fyrirtæki krefjast oft þess að viðskiptavinir þeirra noti hugbúnað fyrir þjónustu sína, til dæmis í bankaviðskiptum og samgöngum. Þetta undirstrikar mikilvægi þess að þróa hágæða ... Master Thesis Reykjavík Reykjavik University Skemman (Iceland) Reykjavík Vinnu ENVELOPE(8.669,8.669,62.665,62.665)
spellingShingle Tölvunarfræði
Meistaraprófsritgerðir
Computer science
Hrefna Namfa Finnsdóttir 1996-
Good or bad? : students’ perspectives on software quality
title Good or bad? : students’ perspectives on software quality
title_full Good or bad? : students’ perspectives on software quality
title_fullStr Good or bad? : students’ perspectives on software quality
title_full_unstemmed Good or bad? : students’ perspectives on software quality
title_short Good or bad? : students’ perspectives on software quality
title_sort good or bad? : students’ perspectives on software quality
topic Tölvunarfræði
Meistaraprófsritgerðir
Computer science
topic_facet Tölvunarfræði
Meistaraprófsritgerðir
Computer science
url http://hdl.handle.net/1946/47683