Fisheries in Norway and Iceland: A comparative study

Iceland and Norway are two countries with shared historical and cultural heritage. They are both today considered to be two of the most important fisheries nations in the developed world. Even though these two nations have strong ties regarding history, culture, fisheries management, technological d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tobias Holmeset 1988-
Other Authors: Háskóli Íslands
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1946/46007
_version_ 1821852806302138368
author Tobias Holmeset 1988-
author2 Háskóli Íslands
author_facet Tobias Holmeset 1988-
author_sort Tobias Holmeset 1988-
collection Skemman (Iceland)
description Iceland and Norway are two countries with shared historical and cultural heritage. They are both today considered to be two of the most important fisheries nations in the developed world. Even though these two nations have strong ties regarding history, culture, fisheries management, technological development, and production, there are still considerable differences. Some of the differences can be explained by biological, geographical, and oceanographic reasons, while others can be directed to political, economic, and social causes. The purpose of this thesis is to study how these two nations implemented modern fisheries management regarding the catch of demersal whitefish, primarily Atlantic cod, saithe and haddock, to deal with unprofitability and overcapacity in the past. And further, how the different paths chosen by these nations affect the fishing activity differently regarding profitability, fleet structure, fishing equipment, processing technology, exports, and demographic impacts. The main research question to be answered is how the differences in the restructured fisheries management system has led to differences that can be seen on the overall output of the fishing activity in the aspects mentioned above. The reasons why these differences have occurred will be traced and the consequences of the different paths that these nations have chosen will be presented and discussed. The conclusion to this question is that Norway and Iceland have chosen different paths in its modern fisheries management to deal with the same problems of unprofitability and overcapacity. The consequences of the different paths and regulations that are chosen may be traced in all aspects of the fishing activity.
format Thesis
genre atlantic cod
Iceland
genre_facet atlantic cod
Iceland
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
id ftskemman:oai:skemman.is:1946/46007
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftskemman
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/1946/46007
publishDate 2023
record_format openpolar
spelling ftskemman:oai:skemman.is:1946/46007 2025-01-16T20:58:52+00:00 Fisheries in Norway and Iceland: A comparative study Tobias Holmeset 1988- Háskóli Íslands 2023-06 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1946/46007 en eng http://hdl.handle.net/1946/46007 Matvælafræði Fiskveiðistjórnun Noregur Ísland Thesis Graduate diploma 2023 ftskemman 2024-01-03T23:54:53Z Iceland and Norway are two countries with shared historical and cultural heritage. They are both today considered to be two of the most important fisheries nations in the developed world. Even though these two nations have strong ties regarding history, culture, fisheries management, technological development, and production, there are still considerable differences. Some of the differences can be explained by biological, geographical, and oceanographic reasons, while others can be directed to political, economic, and social causes. The purpose of this thesis is to study how these two nations implemented modern fisheries management regarding the catch of demersal whitefish, primarily Atlantic cod, saithe and haddock, to deal with unprofitability and overcapacity in the past. And further, how the different paths chosen by these nations affect the fishing activity differently regarding profitability, fleet structure, fishing equipment, processing technology, exports, and demographic impacts. The main research question to be answered is how the differences in the restructured fisheries management system has led to differences that can be seen on the overall output of the fishing activity in the aspects mentioned above. The reasons why these differences have occurred will be traced and the consequences of the different paths that these nations have chosen will be presented and discussed. The conclusion to this question is that Norway and Iceland have chosen different paths in its modern fisheries management to deal with the same problems of unprofitability and overcapacity. The consequences of the different paths and regulations that are chosen may be traced in all aspects of the fishing activity. Thesis atlantic cod Iceland Skemman (Iceland) Norway
spellingShingle Matvælafræði
Fiskveiðistjórnun
Noregur
Ísland
Tobias Holmeset 1988-
Fisheries in Norway and Iceland: A comparative study
title Fisheries in Norway and Iceland: A comparative study
title_full Fisheries in Norway and Iceland: A comparative study
title_fullStr Fisheries in Norway and Iceland: A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Fisheries in Norway and Iceland: A comparative study
title_short Fisheries in Norway and Iceland: A comparative study
title_sort fisheries in norway and iceland: a comparative study
topic Matvælafræði
Fiskveiðistjórnun
Noregur
Ísland
topic_facet Matvælafræði
Fiskveiðistjórnun
Noregur
Ísland
url http://hdl.handle.net/1946/46007