Comparative life cycle assessment of hydrogen production via electrolysis in Austria and Iceland

• Main Author: Kristján Valur Vilbergsson 1994-
• Other Authors: Háskólinn í Reykjavík
• Format: Thesis
• Language: English
• Published: 2021
• Subjects: Orkuverkfræði; Meistaraprófsritgerðir; Rafgreining; Vetni; Ferilprófanir; Endurnýjanleg orka; Sustainable energy engineering; Electrolysis; Hydrogen; Research; Renewable energy sources; Geira; Iceland
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/1946/39468

Hydrogen has the potential to decarbonize sectors and encourage cross-sector developments. The vast Icelandic Renewable Energy Sources (RES) - and its future potential for expansion with wind and hydropower projects - could make green H2 production and its consequential transportation to Austria both economically and environmentally feasible. This dissertation focuses on the environmental side of the equation, aiming at unfolding the different environmental impacts by using LCA as an analytical tool. Two electrolyzers are compared in the study; namely the Polymer Electrolyte Membrane (PEM) - & Alkaline Electrolyzer (AEC). The comparison is carried out through three scenarios, where Icelandic electricity is the variable. Liquefaction, storage and transport processes are added to the scenarios, while the Austrian case excludes these phases. A cradle-to-gate concept is used for the system boundary and the functional unit is set as 1 kg H2 produced. Through the LCIA it was found that the best-case scenario for the electricity feedstock is from the Icelandic hydropower plants and the second-best scenario is that of the Icelandic grid mix. AEC was found to be the best fit for the Icelandic case, as its electricity grid mix consists mostly of baseload power, while PEMEC would be the suitable option for Austria, considering its share of intermittent RES (IRES). However, PEMEC’s environmental footprint is larger than AEC’s due to noble metal loadings for its electrodes. The operation and liquefaction phases contributed most significantly to the impact categories due to their energy intensity. Additional research could be done on high-temperature electrolysers, eg.: Solid Oxide Electrolyzer (SOEC), to add more variety to the comparison scenarios. Comparing future Austrian scenarios such as the 2040 and 2050 electricity grid mixes would give an idea of the longevity for such a potential project. Vetni er hægt að nota til að losa kolvetni og hvetja til þverþróunar milli geira. Miklir íslenskir endurnýjanlegir ...