Iceland’s External Affairs from the Napoleonic Era to the Occupation of Denmark: Danish and British Shelter
Fræðigreinar This paper argues that Iceland enjoyed essential shelter, for its development and prosperity, provided by Denmark and Britain. Societal relations with Copenhagen were of fundamental importance in the preservation and evolution of Icelandic identity and culture, providing the foundation...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1946/23454 |
_version_ | 1821550037869527040 |
---|---|
author | Baldur Þórhallsson 1968- Tómas Joensen 1981- |
author2 | Háskóli Íslands |
author_facet | Baldur Þórhallsson 1968- Tómas Joensen 1981- |
author_sort | Baldur Þórhallsson 1968- |
collection | Skemman (Iceland) |
description | Fræðigreinar This paper argues that Iceland enjoyed essential shelter, for its development and prosperity, provided by Denmark and Britain. Societal relations with Copenhagen were of fundamental importance in the preservation and evolution of Icelandic identity and culture, providing the foundation of the modern society and leading to the establishment of the Icelandic state. Danish financial backups created the basis for the island’s economic prosperity in the 20th century. Moreover, Denmark provided partial political shelter in terms of significant diplomatic support in guaranteeing trade agreements with other states. Also, Denmark led by example and Iceland followed its foreign policy. On the other hand, Denmark failed to provide Iceland with protection of its land and waters and economic cover when it was in most need. Moreover, the economic cover it did provide was, at times, highly costly. Denmark had been downgraded to a small European power in the post-Napoleonic period. In practice, Britain was in control over the North Atlantic. It guaranteed Iceland’s neutrality and connection to the outside world and markets when the Danish authorities failed in these areas, as long as British interests were also served. Nor did British protection come without cost. Accordingly, this paper confirms the common claim of small-state studies that small states are at the mercy of their larger neighbours. Moreover, our findings indicate that Iceland’s growing autonomy did not affect its need for political, economic and societal cover. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | Iceland North Atlantic |
genre_facet | Iceland North Atlantic |
id | ftskemman:oai:skemman.is:1946/23454 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftskemman |
op_relation | http://www.irpa.is Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla, 11 (2): bls. 187-206 1670-6803 1670-679X http://hdl.handle.net/1946/23454 |
publishDate | 2015 |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftskemman:oai:skemman.is:1946/23454 2025-01-16T22:33:22+00:00 Iceland’s External Affairs from the Napoleonic Era to the Occupation of Denmark: Danish and British Shelter Baldur Þórhallsson 1968- Tómas Joensen 1981- Háskóli Íslands 2015-12 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1946/23454 en eng http://www.irpa.is Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla, 11 (2): bls. 187-206 1670-6803 1670-679X http://hdl.handle.net/1946/23454 Smáríki Stjórnmál Utanríkismál Milliríkjasamskipti Efnahagsmál Þjóðaröryggi Danmörk Bretland Article 2015 ftskemman 2022-12-11T06:57:40Z Fræðigreinar This paper argues that Iceland enjoyed essential shelter, for its development and prosperity, provided by Denmark and Britain. Societal relations with Copenhagen were of fundamental importance in the preservation and evolution of Icelandic identity and culture, providing the foundation of the modern society and leading to the establishment of the Icelandic state. Danish financial backups created the basis for the island’s economic prosperity in the 20th century. Moreover, Denmark provided partial political shelter in terms of significant diplomatic support in guaranteeing trade agreements with other states. Also, Denmark led by example and Iceland followed its foreign policy. On the other hand, Denmark failed to provide Iceland with protection of its land and waters and economic cover when it was in most need. Moreover, the economic cover it did provide was, at times, highly costly. Denmark had been downgraded to a small European power in the post-Napoleonic period. In practice, Britain was in control over the North Atlantic. It guaranteed Iceland’s neutrality and connection to the outside world and markets when the Danish authorities failed in these areas, as long as British interests were also served. Nor did British protection come without cost. Accordingly, this paper confirms the common claim of small-state studies that small states are at the mercy of their larger neighbours. Moreover, our findings indicate that Iceland’s growing autonomy did not affect its need for political, economic and societal cover. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland North Atlantic Skemman (Iceland) |
spellingShingle | Smáríki Stjórnmál Utanríkismál Milliríkjasamskipti Efnahagsmál Þjóðaröryggi Danmörk Bretland Baldur Þórhallsson 1968- Tómas Joensen 1981- Iceland’s External Affairs from the Napoleonic Era to the Occupation of Denmark: Danish and British Shelter |
title | Iceland’s External Affairs from the Napoleonic Era to the Occupation of Denmark: Danish and British Shelter |
title_full | Iceland’s External Affairs from the Napoleonic Era to the Occupation of Denmark: Danish and British Shelter |
title_fullStr | Iceland’s External Affairs from the Napoleonic Era to the Occupation of Denmark: Danish and British Shelter |
title_full_unstemmed | Iceland’s External Affairs from the Napoleonic Era to the Occupation of Denmark: Danish and British Shelter |
title_short | Iceland’s External Affairs from the Napoleonic Era to the Occupation of Denmark: Danish and British Shelter |
title_sort | iceland’s external affairs from the napoleonic era to the occupation of denmark: danish and british shelter |
topic | Smáríki Stjórnmál Utanríkismál Milliríkjasamskipti Efnahagsmál Þjóðaröryggi Danmörk Bretland |
topic_facet | Smáríki Stjórnmál Utanríkismál Milliríkjasamskipti Efnahagsmál Þjóðaröryggi Danmörk Bretland |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/1946/23454 |