Iceland’s External Affairs from the Napoleonic Era to the Occupation of Denmark: Danish and British Shelter

Fræðigreinar This paper argues that Iceland enjoyed essential shelter, for its development and prosperity, provided by Denmark and Britain. Societal relations with Copenhagen were of fundamental importance in the preservation and evolution of Icelandic identity and culture, providing the foundation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Baldur Þórhallsson 1968-, Tómas Joensen 1981-
Other Authors: Háskóli Íslands
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1946/23454
_version_ 1821550037869527040
author Baldur Þórhallsson 1968-
Tómas Joensen 1981-
author2 Háskóli Íslands
author_facet Baldur Þórhallsson 1968-
Tómas Joensen 1981-
author_sort Baldur Þórhallsson 1968-
collection Skemman (Iceland)
description Fræðigreinar This paper argues that Iceland enjoyed essential shelter, for its development and prosperity, provided by Denmark and Britain. Societal relations with Copenhagen were of fundamental importance in the preservation and evolution of Icelandic identity and culture, providing the foundation of the modern society and leading to the establishment of the Icelandic state. Danish financial backups created the basis for the island’s economic prosperity in the 20th century. Moreover, Denmark provided partial political shelter in terms of significant diplomatic support in guaranteeing trade agreements with other states. Also, Denmark led by example and Iceland followed its foreign policy. On the other hand, Denmark failed to provide Iceland with protection of its land and waters and economic cover when it was in most need. Moreover, the economic cover it did provide was, at times, highly costly. Denmark had been downgraded to a small European power in the post-Napoleonic period. In practice, Britain was in control over the North Atlantic. It guaranteed Iceland’s neutrality and connection to the outside world and markets when the Danish authorities failed in these areas, as long as British interests were also served. Nor did British protection come without cost. Accordingly, this paper confirms the common claim of small-state studies that small states are at the mercy of their larger neighbours. Moreover, our findings indicate that Iceland’s growing autonomy did not affect its need for political, economic and societal cover.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Iceland
North Atlantic
genre_facet Iceland
North Atlantic
id ftskemman:oai:skemman.is:1946/23454
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftskemman
op_relation http://www.irpa.is
Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla, 11 (2): bls. 187-206
1670-6803
1670-679X
http://hdl.handle.net/1946/23454
publishDate 2015
record_format openpolar
spelling ftskemman:oai:skemman.is:1946/23454 2025-01-16T22:33:22+00:00 Iceland’s External Affairs from the Napoleonic Era to the Occupation of Denmark: Danish and British Shelter Baldur Þórhallsson 1968- Tómas Joensen 1981- Háskóli Íslands 2015-12 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1946/23454 en eng http://www.irpa.is Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla, 11 (2): bls. 187-206 1670-6803 1670-679X http://hdl.handle.net/1946/23454 Smáríki Stjórnmál Utanríkismál Milliríkjasamskipti Efnahagsmál Þjóðaröryggi Danmörk Bretland Article 2015 ftskemman 2022-12-11T06:57:40Z Fræðigreinar This paper argues that Iceland enjoyed essential shelter, for its development and prosperity, provided by Denmark and Britain. Societal relations with Copenhagen were of fundamental importance in the preservation and evolution of Icelandic identity and culture, providing the foundation of the modern society and leading to the establishment of the Icelandic state. Danish financial backups created the basis for the island’s economic prosperity in the 20th century. Moreover, Denmark provided partial political shelter in terms of significant diplomatic support in guaranteeing trade agreements with other states. Also, Denmark led by example and Iceland followed its foreign policy. On the other hand, Denmark failed to provide Iceland with protection of its land and waters and economic cover when it was in most need. Moreover, the economic cover it did provide was, at times, highly costly. Denmark had been downgraded to a small European power in the post-Napoleonic period. In practice, Britain was in control over the North Atlantic. It guaranteed Iceland’s neutrality and connection to the outside world and markets when the Danish authorities failed in these areas, as long as British interests were also served. Nor did British protection come without cost. Accordingly, this paper confirms the common claim of small-state studies that small states are at the mercy of their larger neighbours. Moreover, our findings indicate that Iceland’s growing autonomy did not affect its need for political, economic and societal cover. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland North Atlantic Skemman (Iceland)
spellingShingle Smáríki
Stjórnmál
Utanríkismál
Milliríkjasamskipti
Efnahagsmál
Þjóðaröryggi
Danmörk
Bretland
Baldur Þórhallsson 1968-
Tómas Joensen 1981-
Iceland’s External Affairs from the Napoleonic Era to the Occupation of Denmark: Danish and British Shelter
title Iceland’s External Affairs from the Napoleonic Era to the Occupation of Denmark: Danish and British Shelter
title_full Iceland’s External Affairs from the Napoleonic Era to the Occupation of Denmark: Danish and British Shelter
title_fullStr Iceland’s External Affairs from the Napoleonic Era to the Occupation of Denmark: Danish and British Shelter
title_full_unstemmed Iceland’s External Affairs from the Napoleonic Era to the Occupation of Denmark: Danish and British Shelter
title_short Iceland’s External Affairs from the Napoleonic Era to the Occupation of Denmark: Danish and British Shelter
title_sort iceland’s external affairs from the napoleonic era to the occupation of denmark: danish and british shelter
topic Smáríki
Stjórnmál
Utanríkismál
Milliríkjasamskipti
Efnahagsmál
Þjóðaröryggi
Danmörk
Bretland
topic_facet Smáríki
Stjórnmál
Utanríkismál
Milliríkjasamskipti
Efnahagsmál
Þjóðaröryggi
Danmörk
Bretland
url http://hdl.handle.net/1946/23454