Quality Pain Management in the Hospital Setting

Background and aims: Pain management is an important factor in quality health care. Reviewing the literature shows that quality pain management (QPM) is vaguely defined and that pain is still prevalent and severe in many hospitalized patients, despite efforts to improve quality in the past decades....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sigríður Zoëga 1973-
Other Authors: Háskóli Íslands
Format: Doctoral or Postdoctoral Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1946/19855
_version_ 1821558163805044736
author Sigríður Zoëga 1973-
author2 Háskóli Íslands
author_facet Sigríður Zoëga 1973-
author_sort Sigríður Zoëga 1973-
collection Skemman (Iceland)
description Background and aims: Pain management is an important factor in quality health care. Reviewing the literature shows that quality pain management (QPM) is vaguely defined and that pain is still prevalent and severe in many hospitalized patients, despite efforts to improve quality in the past decades. The aims of the study were to explore, define, and assess QPM in the hospital setting. This project is based on three studies, reported in four papers (I-IV). Material and methods: In the first study (Paper I) Morse’s method of concept evaluation was used to analyze the literature to identify the structural aspects of QPM, and to put forward a definition of the concept. In the second study (Paper II), a descriptive, cross-sectional design was used to evaluate the psychometric properties of the American Pain Society Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R), purport to measure patient outcomes in relation to pain management. In the third study a descriptive point-prevalence design was used to assess QPM from the patient’s perspective (Paper III), and explore the pain management processes in a university hospital (Paper IV). APS-POQ-R, Icelandic version (APS-POQ-R-I), was used to collect data from patients, but clinical and medication data were collected from medical records and the hospital-data warehouse, by checklists made by the researchers. A modified version of the Pain Management Index (PMI) was used to measure the adequacy of the pain treatment in paper IV. For the second and third studies the sample consisted of patients, 18 years and older, who had been hospitalized for at least 24 hours, understood Icelandic, and were able to participate in the study. For the second study the patients had to have experienced pain (defined as ≥ 1 on 0-10 scale) in the past 24 hours. For the third study all patients could participate, regardless of pain. The studies were conducted in 23 inpatient wards on surgical and medical services in Landspítali, The National University Hospital of Iceland. Results: In line with the Donabedian health care ...
format Doctoral or Postdoctoral Thesis
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
id ftskemman:oai:skemman.is:1946/19855
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftskemman
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/1946/19855
publishDate 2014
record_format openpolar
spelling ftskemman:oai:skemman.is:1946/19855 2025-01-16T22:41:15+00:00 Quality Pain Management in the Hospital Setting Sigríður Zoëga 1973- Háskóli Íslands 2014-11 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1946/19855 en eng http://hdl.handle.net/1946/19855 Doktorsritgerðir Thesis Doctoral 2014 ftskemman 2024-08-14T04:39:51Z Background and aims: Pain management is an important factor in quality health care. Reviewing the literature shows that quality pain management (QPM) is vaguely defined and that pain is still prevalent and severe in many hospitalized patients, despite efforts to improve quality in the past decades. The aims of the study were to explore, define, and assess QPM in the hospital setting. This project is based on three studies, reported in four papers (I-IV). Material and methods: In the first study (Paper I) Morse’s method of concept evaluation was used to analyze the literature to identify the structural aspects of QPM, and to put forward a definition of the concept. In the second study (Paper II), a descriptive, cross-sectional design was used to evaluate the psychometric properties of the American Pain Society Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R), purport to measure patient outcomes in relation to pain management. In the third study a descriptive point-prevalence design was used to assess QPM from the patient’s perspective (Paper III), and explore the pain management processes in a university hospital (Paper IV). APS-POQ-R, Icelandic version (APS-POQ-R-I), was used to collect data from patients, but clinical and medication data were collected from medical records and the hospital-data warehouse, by checklists made by the researchers. A modified version of the Pain Management Index (PMI) was used to measure the adequacy of the pain treatment in paper IV. For the second and third studies the sample consisted of patients, 18 years and older, who had been hospitalized for at least 24 hours, understood Icelandic, and were able to participate in the study. For the second study the patients had to have experienced pain (defined as ≥ 1 on 0-10 scale) in the past 24 hours. For the third study all patients could participate, regardless of pain. The studies were conducted in 23 inpatient wards on surgical and medical services in Landspítali, The National University Hospital of Iceland. Results: In line with the Donabedian health care ... Doctoral or Postdoctoral Thesis Iceland Skemman (Iceland)
spellingShingle Doktorsritgerðir
Sigríður Zoëga 1973-
Quality Pain Management in the Hospital Setting
title Quality Pain Management in the Hospital Setting
title_full Quality Pain Management in the Hospital Setting
title_fullStr Quality Pain Management in the Hospital Setting
title_full_unstemmed Quality Pain Management in the Hospital Setting
title_short Quality Pain Management in the Hospital Setting
title_sort quality pain management in the hospital setting
topic Doktorsritgerðir
topic_facet Doktorsritgerðir
url http://hdl.handle.net/1946/19855