Organizational designs for managing incremental and radical innovation

This paper explores what types of organizational design mature firms in Iceland employ to host incremental and radical innovation. As innovation is generally recognized to be important for a firm’s competitive success, companies need to find the right balance between exploitation through incremental...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brynjar Freyr Halldórsson 1989-
Other Authors: Háskólinn í Reykjavík
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1946/16149
id ftskemman:oai:skemman.is:1946/16149
record_format openpolar
spelling ftskemman:oai:skemman.is:1946/16149 2023-05-15T16:48:00+02:00 Organizational designs for managing incremental and radical innovation Brynjar Freyr Halldórsson 1989- Háskólinn í Reykjavík 2013-05 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1946/16149 en eng http://hdl.handle.net/1946/16149 Viðskiptafræði Nýsköpun í atvinnulífi Atvinnurekstur Creative ability in business Business administration Thesis Bachelor's 2013 ftskemman 2022-12-11T06:56:18Z This paper explores what types of organizational design mature firms in Iceland employ to host incremental and radical innovation. As innovation is generally recognized to be important for a firm’s competitive success, companies need to find the right balance between exploitation through incremental innovation and exploration through radical innovation. This paper draws on a case study by Tushman, Smith, Wood, Westerman, & O'Reilly (2004), which describes four different approaches of organizational design that organizations can employ in managing radical and incremental innovation: functional design, cross-functional teams, ambidextrous design and unsupported teams. A sample of six business units in Iceland, active in innovation and competing in a variety of industries, was explored for this research. Senior managers that were highly involved in innovation projects at their respective companies were interviewed. Each organization was mapped, based on whether it had high or low senior management integration, and high or low structural differentiation. Of the companies explored, three were found to employ a functional design, two cross-functional teams, and one employs an ambidextrous design. Despite efforts to find a case company that might employ unsupported teams, none of the case firms were found to employ that particular organizational design. Thesis Iceland Skemman (Iceland)
institution Open Polar
collection Skemman (Iceland)
op_collection_id ftskemman
language English
topic Viðskiptafræði
Nýsköpun í atvinnulífi
Atvinnurekstur
Creative ability in business
Business administration
spellingShingle Viðskiptafræði
Nýsköpun í atvinnulífi
Atvinnurekstur
Creative ability in business
Business administration
Brynjar Freyr Halldórsson 1989-
Organizational designs for managing incremental and radical innovation
topic_facet Viðskiptafræði
Nýsköpun í atvinnulífi
Atvinnurekstur
Creative ability in business
Business administration
description This paper explores what types of organizational design mature firms in Iceland employ to host incremental and radical innovation. As innovation is generally recognized to be important for a firm’s competitive success, companies need to find the right balance between exploitation through incremental innovation and exploration through radical innovation. This paper draws on a case study by Tushman, Smith, Wood, Westerman, & O'Reilly (2004), which describes four different approaches of organizational design that organizations can employ in managing radical and incremental innovation: functional design, cross-functional teams, ambidextrous design and unsupported teams. A sample of six business units in Iceland, active in innovation and competing in a variety of industries, was explored for this research. Senior managers that were highly involved in innovation projects at their respective companies were interviewed. Each organization was mapped, based on whether it had high or low senior management integration, and high or low structural differentiation. Of the companies explored, three were found to employ a functional design, two cross-functional teams, and one employs an ambidextrous design. Despite efforts to find a case company that might employ unsupported teams, none of the case firms were found to employ that particular organizational design.
author2 Háskólinn í Reykjavík
format Thesis
author Brynjar Freyr Halldórsson 1989-
author_facet Brynjar Freyr Halldórsson 1989-
author_sort Brynjar Freyr Halldórsson 1989-
title Organizational designs for managing incremental and radical innovation
title_short Organizational designs for managing incremental and radical innovation
title_full Organizational designs for managing incremental and radical innovation
title_fullStr Organizational designs for managing incremental and radical innovation
title_full_unstemmed Organizational designs for managing incremental and radical innovation
title_sort organizational designs for managing incremental and radical innovation
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/1946/16149
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/1946/16149
_version_ 1766038100536983552