Climate change mitigation effects: How do potential CO2 leaks from a sub-seabed storage site in the Norwegian Sea affect Astarte sp. bivalves?

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is one of the most promising mitigation strategies for reducing the emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) to the atmosphere and may substantially help to decelerate global warming. There is an increasing demand for CCS sites. Nevertheless, there is a lack of knowledge of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Chemosphere
Main Authors: Bonnail, Estefanía, Borrero Santiago, Ana Rocío, Nordtug, Trond, Øverjordet, Ida Beathe, Krause, Daniel Franklin, Ardelan, Murat Van
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3019024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128552
id ftsintef:oai:sintef.brage.unit.no:11250/3019024
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsintef:oai:sintef.brage.unit.no:11250/3019024 2023-05-15T17:47:08+02:00 Climate change mitigation effects: How do potential CO2 leaks from a sub-seabed storage site in the Norwegian Sea affect Astarte sp. bivalves? Bonnail, Estefanía Borrero Santiago, Ana Rocío Nordtug, Trond Øverjordet, Ida Beathe Krause, Daniel Franklin Ardelan, Murat Van 2021 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3019024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128552 eng eng Elsevier Norges forskningsråd: 254777 Chemosphere. 2021, 264, 1-12 . urn:issn:0045-6535 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3019024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128552 cristin:1846253 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Open access from 7 October 2022. Published article is available here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128552 CC-BY-NC-ND 12 264 Chemosphere Shell growth rate Metal bioaccumulation CO2 impacts Astarte sp Carbon capture storage risks Peer reviewed Journal article 2021 ftsintef https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128552 2022-09-21T22:42:40Z Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is one of the most promising mitigation strategies for reducing the emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) to the atmosphere and may substantially help to decelerate global warming. There is an increasing demand for CCS sites. Nevertheless, there is a lack of knowledge of the environmental risk associated with potential leakage of CO2 from the storage sites; and even more, what happens when the seepage stops. Can the environment return to the initial equilibrium? Potential effects on native macrofauna were studied under a scenario of a 50-day CO2 leakage, and the subsequent leak closure. To accomplish the objective, Trondheim Fjord sediments and clams were exposed to an acidified environment (pH 6.9) at 29 atm for 7 weeks followed by a 14-day recovery at normal seawater conditions (pH 8.0, 29 atm). Growth and survival of clams exposed to pressure (29 atm) and reduced pH (6.9) did not significantly differ from control clams kept at 1 atm in natural seawater. Furthermore, bioaccumulation of elements in the soft tissue of clams did not register significant variations for most of the analysed elements (Cd, Cr, Pb, and Ti), while other elements (As, Cu, Fe, Ni) had decreasing concentrations in tissues under acidified conditions in contrast to Na and Mg, which registered an uptake (Ku) of 111 and 9.92 μg g−1dw d−1, respectively. This Ku may be altered due to the stress induced by acidification; and the element concentration being released from sediments was not highly affected at that pH. Therefore, a 1 unit drop in pH at the seafloor for several weeks does not appear to pose a risk for the clams. acceptedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Norwegian Sea SINTEF Open (Brage) Norwegian Sea Chemosphere 264 128552
institution Open Polar
collection SINTEF Open (Brage)
op_collection_id ftsintef
language English
topic Shell growth rate
Metal bioaccumulation
CO2 impacts
Astarte sp
Carbon capture storage risks
spellingShingle Shell growth rate
Metal bioaccumulation
CO2 impacts
Astarte sp
Carbon capture storage risks
Bonnail, Estefanía
Borrero Santiago, Ana Rocío
Nordtug, Trond
Øverjordet, Ida Beathe
Krause, Daniel Franklin
Ardelan, Murat Van
Climate change mitigation effects: How do potential CO2 leaks from a sub-seabed storage site in the Norwegian Sea affect Astarte sp. bivalves?
topic_facet Shell growth rate
Metal bioaccumulation
CO2 impacts
Astarte sp
Carbon capture storage risks
description Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is one of the most promising mitigation strategies for reducing the emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) to the atmosphere and may substantially help to decelerate global warming. There is an increasing demand for CCS sites. Nevertheless, there is a lack of knowledge of the environmental risk associated with potential leakage of CO2 from the storage sites; and even more, what happens when the seepage stops. Can the environment return to the initial equilibrium? Potential effects on native macrofauna were studied under a scenario of a 50-day CO2 leakage, and the subsequent leak closure. To accomplish the objective, Trondheim Fjord sediments and clams were exposed to an acidified environment (pH 6.9) at 29 atm for 7 weeks followed by a 14-day recovery at normal seawater conditions (pH 8.0, 29 atm). Growth and survival of clams exposed to pressure (29 atm) and reduced pH (6.9) did not significantly differ from control clams kept at 1 atm in natural seawater. Furthermore, bioaccumulation of elements in the soft tissue of clams did not register significant variations for most of the analysed elements (Cd, Cr, Pb, and Ti), while other elements (As, Cu, Fe, Ni) had decreasing concentrations in tissues under acidified conditions in contrast to Na and Mg, which registered an uptake (Ku) of 111 and 9.92 μg g−1dw d−1, respectively. This Ku may be altered due to the stress induced by acidification; and the element concentration being released from sediments was not highly affected at that pH. Therefore, a 1 unit drop in pH at the seafloor for several weeks does not appear to pose a risk for the clams. acceptedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Bonnail, Estefanía
Borrero Santiago, Ana Rocío
Nordtug, Trond
Øverjordet, Ida Beathe
Krause, Daniel Franklin
Ardelan, Murat Van
author_facet Bonnail, Estefanía
Borrero Santiago, Ana Rocío
Nordtug, Trond
Øverjordet, Ida Beathe
Krause, Daniel Franklin
Ardelan, Murat Van
author_sort Bonnail, Estefanía
title Climate change mitigation effects: How do potential CO2 leaks from a sub-seabed storage site in the Norwegian Sea affect Astarte sp. bivalves?
title_short Climate change mitigation effects: How do potential CO2 leaks from a sub-seabed storage site in the Norwegian Sea affect Astarte sp. bivalves?
title_full Climate change mitigation effects: How do potential CO2 leaks from a sub-seabed storage site in the Norwegian Sea affect Astarte sp. bivalves?
title_fullStr Climate change mitigation effects: How do potential CO2 leaks from a sub-seabed storage site in the Norwegian Sea affect Astarte sp. bivalves?
title_full_unstemmed Climate change mitigation effects: How do potential CO2 leaks from a sub-seabed storage site in the Norwegian Sea affect Astarte sp. bivalves?
title_sort climate change mitigation effects: how do potential co2 leaks from a sub-seabed storage site in the norwegian sea affect astarte sp. bivalves?
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3019024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128552
geographic Norwegian Sea
geographic_facet Norwegian Sea
genre Norwegian Sea
genre_facet Norwegian Sea
op_source 12
264
Chemosphere
op_relation Norges forskningsråd: 254777
Chemosphere. 2021, 264, 1-12 .
urn:issn:0045-6535
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3019024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128552
cristin:1846253
op_rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no
This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Open access from 7 October 2022. Published article is available here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128552
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC-ND
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128552
container_title Chemosphere
container_volume 264
container_start_page 128552
_version_ 1766151465291743232