Validation and constraint: a discursive examination of the British Columbia land question in an era of treaty negotiations

In the early 1990s, when a process was established to negotiate modern-day treaties in British Columbia (BC), it was presumed that a majority of First Nation land claims would be resolved over the course of the following twelve years. Now, some fifteen years later, only two agreements have been reac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sadik, Tonio
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://summit.sfu.ca/item/9219
id ftsimonfu:oai:summit.sfu.ca:9219
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsimonfu:oai:summit.sfu.ca:9219 2023-05-15T16:17:02+02:00 Validation and constraint: a discursive examination of the British Columbia land question in an era of treaty negotiations Sadik, Tonio 2008 http://summit.sfu.ca/item/9219 English eng http://summit.sfu.ca/item/9219 Thesis 2008 ftsimonfu 2022-04-07T18:36:24Z In the early 1990s, when a process was established to negotiate modern-day treaties in British Columbia (BC), it was presumed that a majority of First Nation land claims would be resolved over the course of the following twelve years. Now, some fifteen years later, only two agreements have been reached as a part of this process. The reasons for this malaise are many, and while the relative failure of the treaty process in BC could be attributed to any number of factors, this thesis examines the inception of this process, with a focus on the period 1995-99, as a basis for challenging the perception that we have transcended the policy of denial that characterized indigenous-state relations in BC prior to the treaty process. Relying upon participant-observation, ethnographic interviews, and an analysis of media, this thesis asks: how has the discursive context of the BC land question been transformed by the treaty process? What impact did the perception that the public was being called upon to participate in forums about the BC land question have on the discursive construction of this policy field? And how did the perception that BC had entered a new era of recognition (rather than of denial) inform peoples’ sense of what the treaty process was about and the outcomes it would lead to? The thesis argues that the historical policy of denial that characterized indigenous-state relations in BC continues to be embodied in a dialectic of validation and constraint that informs contemporary efforts to manage the BC land question. It is by advancing this analysis that this thesis seeks not only to bring an element of clarity to a process that continues to frustrate the aspirations of many First Nations in BC, but also highlights some of the contributions that anthropology has to make to a study of public policy. Thesis First Nations Summit - SFU Research Repository (Simon Fraser University)
institution Open Polar
collection Summit - SFU Research Repository (Simon Fraser University)
op_collection_id ftsimonfu
language English
description In the early 1990s, when a process was established to negotiate modern-day treaties in British Columbia (BC), it was presumed that a majority of First Nation land claims would be resolved over the course of the following twelve years. Now, some fifteen years later, only two agreements have been reached as a part of this process. The reasons for this malaise are many, and while the relative failure of the treaty process in BC could be attributed to any number of factors, this thesis examines the inception of this process, with a focus on the period 1995-99, as a basis for challenging the perception that we have transcended the policy of denial that characterized indigenous-state relations in BC prior to the treaty process. Relying upon participant-observation, ethnographic interviews, and an analysis of media, this thesis asks: how has the discursive context of the BC land question been transformed by the treaty process? What impact did the perception that the public was being called upon to participate in forums about the BC land question have on the discursive construction of this policy field? And how did the perception that BC had entered a new era of recognition (rather than of denial) inform peoples’ sense of what the treaty process was about and the outcomes it would lead to? The thesis argues that the historical policy of denial that characterized indigenous-state relations in BC continues to be embodied in a dialectic of validation and constraint that informs contemporary efforts to manage the BC land question. It is by advancing this analysis that this thesis seeks not only to bring an element of clarity to a process that continues to frustrate the aspirations of many First Nations in BC, but also highlights some of the contributions that anthropology has to make to a study of public policy.
format Thesis
author Sadik, Tonio
spellingShingle Sadik, Tonio
Validation and constraint: a discursive examination of the British Columbia land question in an era of treaty negotiations
author_facet Sadik, Tonio
author_sort Sadik, Tonio
title Validation and constraint: a discursive examination of the British Columbia land question in an era of treaty negotiations
title_short Validation and constraint: a discursive examination of the British Columbia land question in an era of treaty negotiations
title_full Validation and constraint: a discursive examination of the British Columbia land question in an era of treaty negotiations
title_fullStr Validation and constraint: a discursive examination of the British Columbia land question in an era of treaty negotiations
title_full_unstemmed Validation and constraint: a discursive examination of the British Columbia land question in an era of treaty negotiations
title_sort validation and constraint: a discursive examination of the british columbia land question in an era of treaty negotiations
publishDate 2008
url http://summit.sfu.ca/item/9219
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_relation http://summit.sfu.ca/item/9219
_version_ 1766002882049474560