Reconceptualizing and Reclaiming Cumulative Effects Assessment and Management Through Differing Ways of Knowing

The consideration of Indigenous Knowledge systems in the management of natural resources is growing in Canada to meet legal requirements, fill gaps in knowledge, and improve reconciliation with Indigenous peoples. The recent Yahey (Blue Berry First Nations) v. British Columbia, Supreme Court of Brit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ignace, Lawrence
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Supporting Aboriginal Graduate Enhancement 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lib.sfu.ca/index.php/igss/article/view/6204
id ftsimonfrazerudp:oai:ojs.journals.lib.sfu.ca:article/6204
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsimonfrazerudp:oai:ojs.journals.lib.sfu.ca:article/6204 2023-10-29T02:36:22+01:00 Reconceptualizing and Reclaiming Cumulative Effects Assessment and Management Through Differing Ways of Knowing Ignace, Lawrence 2023-09-29 application/pdf https://journals.lib.sfu.ca/index.php/igss/article/view/6204 eng eng Supporting Aboriginal Graduate Enhancement https://journals.lib.sfu.ca/index.php/igss/article/view/6204/5439 https://journals.lib.sfu.ca/index.php/igss/article/view/6204 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 Indigenous Graduate Student Symposium Journal; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Honouring Research, Honouring Community Indigenous knowledge Knowledge co-production Indigenous research methods info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2023 ftsimonfrazerudp 2023-10-01T17:42:05Z The consideration of Indigenous Knowledge systems in the management of natural resources is growing in Canada to meet legal requirements, fill gaps in knowledge, and improve reconciliation with Indigenous peoples. The recent Yahey (Blue Berry First Nations) v. British Columbia, Supreme Court of British Columbia decision has brought cumulative effects to the forefront. In this presentation, I discussed three Indigenous frameworks that could be used to re-shape cumulative effects assessment and management. While it is recognized there are complementary aspects of western science and Indigenous Knowledge, there remain questions as to how best to align these worldviews. Much of the recent natural resource management literature reviewing the bridging of Indigenous knowledge systems with Western science continues to be generated from the dominant colonial point of view. There is a need to ensure Indigenous Knowledge systems are reflected in an equal manner while allowing Indigenous communities and nations the necessary capacity and time to consider these pressures more fulsomely. Cumulative effects on their own are complex, broad, and pervasive and are not well considered in natural resource management processes. As a result of the complexity, the assessment and management of cumulative effects suffer from a lack of integrated baseline data, consideration of social-ecological thresholds and coordinating management responses. By exploring three examples of Indigenous worldviews, I demonstrate how cumulative effects assessment could be reframed to better address these complexities while supporting community level needs and interests. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations SFU Library Digital Publishing (Simon Fraser University, Vancouver)
institution Open Polar
collection SFU Library Digital Publishing (Simon Fraser University, Vancouver)
op_collection_id ftsimonfrazerudp
language English
topic Indigenous knowledge
Knowledge co-production
Indigenous research methods
spellingShingle Indigenous knowledge
Knowledge co-production
Indigenous research methods
Ignace, Lawrence
Reconceptualizing and Reclaiming Cumulative Effects Assessment and Management Through Differing Ways of Knowing
topic_facet Indigenous knowledge
Knowledge co-production
Indigenous research methods
description The consideration of Indigenous Knowledge systems in the management of natural resources is growing in Canada to meet legal requirements, fill gaps in knowledge, and improve reconciliation with Indigenous peoples. The recent Yahey (Blue Berry First Nations) v. British Columbia, Supreme Court of British Columbia decision has brought cumulative effects to the forefront. In this presentation, I discussed three Indigenous frameworks that could be used to re-shape cumulative effects assessment and management. While it is recognized there are complementary aspects of western science and Indigenous Knowledge, there remain questions as to how best to align these worldviews. Much of the recent natural resource management literature reviewing the bridging of Indigenous knowledge systems with Western science continues to be generated from the dominant colonial point of view. There is a need to ensure Indigenous Knowledge systems are reflected in an equal manner while allowing Indigenous communities and nations the necessary capacity and time to consider these pressures more fulsomely. Cumulative effects on their own are complex, broad, and pervasive and are not well considered in natural resource management processes. As a result of the complexity, the assessment and management of cumulative effects suffer from a lack of integrated baseline data, consideration of social-ecological thresholds and coordinating management responses. By exploring three examples of Indigenous worldviews, I demonstrate how cumulative effects assessment could be reframed to better address these complexities while supporting community level needs and interests.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ignace, Lawrence
author_facet Ignace, Lawrence
author_sort Ignace, Lawrence
title Reconceptualizing and Reclaiming Cumulative Effects Assessment and Management Through Differing Ways of Knowing
title_short Reconceptualizing and Reclaiming Cumulative Effects Assessment and Management Through Differing Ways of Knowing
title_full Reconceptualizing and Reclaiming Cumulative Effects Assessment and Management Through Differing Ways of Knowing
title_fullStr Reconceptualizing and Reclaiming Cumulative Effects Assessment and Management Through Differing Ways of Knowing
title_full_unstemmed Reconceptualizing and Reclaiming Cumulative Effects Assessment and Management Through Differing Ways of Knowing
title_sort reconceptualizing and reclaiming cumulative effects assessment and management through differing ways of knowing
publisher Supporting Aboriginal Graduate Enhancement
publishDate 2023
url https://journals.lib.sfu.ca/index.php/igss/article/view/6204
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_source Indigenous Graduate Student Symposium Journal; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Honouring Research, Honouring Community
op_relation https://journals.lib.sfu.ca/index.php/igss/article/view/6204/5439
https://journals.lib.sfu.ca/index.php/igss/article/view/6204
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
_version_ 1781060232537964544