The taxonomic status of dolphins Tursiops spp. and Delphinus in South African waters

• Main Author: Ngqulana, Sibusisiwe Gloria
• Format: Doctoral or Postdoctoral Thesis
• Language: English
• Published: Nelson Mandela University 2020
• Subjects: Dolphins > Classification > South Africa; toothed whales
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/48566; http://vital.seals.ac.za:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:40891

There is a need for identifying important sites, taxonomic units or populations and the usual criterion used is species identification. The species is the most important taxonomic unit to define in taxonomy, as it is the primary unit of concern in biodiversity, conservation and other biological issues. Thus, taxonomy plays an important role in conservation biology. Additionally, taxonomy can contribute to the development of analytical systems that will provide information on priorities for reaching defensible targets for established conservation. This poses a problem for cetaceans as basic information is frequently deficient and therefore not suitable for conservation planning purposes. This leads to difficulties in identifying and prioritizing areas for the monitoring, management and for the protection of species or populations. Morphological and geographic data used to be the primary means used by taxonomists to define species and subspecies, and due to this, most extant species have been classified by morphological characteristics. However, in the recent years, molecular analyses have been introduced and subsequently stable isotopes were also included to assist in interpreting results. Thereafter, it became a common approach to use more than one technique or a combination of independent datasets to resolve taxonomic uncertainties. This has resulted to a proposed term known as integrative taxonomy. Integrative taxonomy has recently been used in most studies that deal with taxonomy or population structure. The use of multiple lines of evidence, which is sometimes referred to as integrative taxonomy, raises the level of confidence in clearly delineating species. Cetaceans are the most taxonomically diverse group of aquatic mammals, with 93 living species accepted. Previously, their taxonomy was based on morphological characters. However, cetaceans have recently been subjected to intense phylogenetic investigations using both morphological and molecular data. These problems are not only prevalent in larger whales, but the small toothed whales also have these challenges, particularly family Delphinidae. This family is known to be the most diverse among the toothed whales. This is because this family diverged recently, and the divergence occurred relatively fast. This study aimed to clarify the taxonomic status of Tursiops spp. and Delphinus in the family Delphinidae, inhabiting the South African waters, using a combination of morphological and molecular methods. For skull morphology, geometric morphometrics were used, while for molecular methods, the D-loop region in the mitochondrial DNA was used to detect any differences within each genus. For the genus Tursiops, this study showed the consistency of results in all analyses used to investigate the presence of two species in the genus Tursiops in South African waters. This study only analysed sequences from the mitochondrial D-loop region and has re-confirmed the presence of the two species in South Africa. Skull and external morphology both show T. truncatus to be bigger and more robust, and to have a shorter rostrum compared with T. aduncus. These external observations are helpful when identifying the species in the field. Providing evidence supporting the presence of two Tursiops species in South Africa does not only contribute to the global context of the taxonomy of this genus, but also in the local context. This study also gives insight on the distribution of the two species in the region. For the genus Delphinus, molecular analysis did not reveal any clustering in South African Delphinus specimens, which suggested a single species, D. delphis, and that this species is morphologically highly variable. Both skull and external morphology did not reflect the molecular results, supporting suggestions that morphology in this genus does not reflect genetic differences. It has been shown that morphological variation reflects feeding specialization rather than speciation. This may also reflect local adaptations. Both skull and external morphology in this study showed no significant differences. This study did not investigate the phylogeographic details of the species in South Africa and further molecular work including a larger sample size from the west coast of South Africa is needed. By attempting to unravel the taxonomy of these dolphins in South African waters, the findings of this study will be very useful in the development of effective conservation and management strategies for these dolphins.