Global Miljøstyring av Olje- og Gassaktiviteter i Arktis: et institusjonalisert samarbeid eller en uformell dialog?

Multi-stakeholder cooperation, with focus on private business entities, is receiving increasing attention in the governance literature. Lately, we are witnessing the consequences of global warming; large areas in the Arctic are becoming ice-free, opening for oil and gas activities. This development...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Politik
Main Author: Refsnes, Aase
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Danish
Published: Institut for Statskundskab, Københavns Universitet 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://tidsskrift.dk/politik/article/view/27472
id ftsbaarhusojs:oai:ojs.tidsskrift.dk:article/27472
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsbaarhusojs:oai:ojs.tidsskrift.dk:article/27472 2023-05-15T14:30:48+02:00 Global Miljøstyring av Olje- og Gassaktiviteter i Arktis: et institusjonalisert samarbeid eller en uformell dialog? Refsnes, Aase 2011-04-11 application/pdf https://tidsskrift.dk/politik/article/view/27472 dan dan Institut for Statskundskab, Københavns Universitet https://tidsskrift.dk/politik/article/view/27472/24195 https://tidsskrift.dk/politik/article/view/27472 Copyright (c) 2016 Forfatteren og Tidsskriftet Politik har sammen rettighederne til materiale publiceret i Politik Politik; Årg. 14 Nr. 1 (2011): Politik Politik; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2011): Politik 2446-0893 1604-0058 Arktis suverænitet styring geopolitik info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2011 ftsbaarhusojs 2021-05-06T20:36:50Z Multi-stakeholder cooperation, with focus on private business entities, is receiving increasing attention in the governance literature. Lately, we are witnessing the consequences of global warming; large areas in the Arctic are becoming ice-free, opening for oil and gas activities. This development requires answers to how we should govern these activities in a vulnerable Arctic environment. In a myriad of multi-stakeholder relationships, institutionalized relationships between private and public actors have been prevalent. Consequently, should we expect to witness formal cooperative arrangements between the oil and gas industry, as business representatives, and the Arctic Council, as a representative for the public authorities? Or has global governance theory exaggerated the extent of multi-stakeholder cooperation? Surprisingly, a formal cooperation among the actors does not appear to exist. However there is a high presence of informal cooperation. The question remains; has there been a too narrow focus on the different forms of collaborative action? Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Council Arctic Arktis Arktis* Global warming Aarhus University: OJS at The State and University Library Arctic Politik 14 1
institution Open Polar
collection Aarhus University: OJS at The State and University Library
op_collection_id ftsbaarhusojs
language Danish
topic Arktis
suverænitet
styring
geopolitik
spellingShingle Arktis
suverænitet
styring
geopolitik
Refsnes, Aase
Global Miljøstyring av Olje- og Gassaktiviteter i Arktis: et institusjonalisert samarbeid eller en uformell dialog?
topic_facet Arktis
suverænitet
styring
geopolitik
description Multi-stakeholder cooperation, with focus on private business entities, is receiving increasing attention in the governance literature. Lately, we are witnessing the consequences of global warming; large areas in the Arctic are becoming ice-free, opening for oil and gas activities. This development requires answers to how we should govern these activities in a vulnerable Arctic environment. In a myriad of multi-stakeholder relationships, institutionalized relationships between private and public actors have been prevalent. Consequently, should we expect to witness formal cooperative arrangements between the oil and gas industry, as business representatives, and the Arctic Council, as a representative for the public authorities? Or has global governance theory exaggerated the extent of multi-stakeholder cooperation? Surprisingly, a formal cooperation among the actors does not appear to exist. However there is a high presence of informal cooperation. The question remains; has there been a too narrow focus on the different forms of collaborative action?
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Refsnes, Aase
author_facet Refsnes, Aase
author_sort Refsnes, Aase
title Global Miljøstyring av Olje- og Gassaktiviteter i Arktis: et institusjonalisert samarbeid eller en uformell dialog?
title_short Global Miljøstyring av Olje- og Gassaktiviteter i Arktis: et institusjonalisert samarbeid eller en uformell dialog?
title_full Global Miljøstyring av Olje- og Gassaktiviteter i Arktis: et institusjonalisert samarbeid eller en uformell dialog?
title_fullStr Global Miljøstyring av Olje- og Gassaktiviteter i Arktis: et institusjonalisert samarbeid eller en uformell dialog?
title_full_unstemmed Global Miljøstyring av Olje- og Gassaktiviteter i Arktis: et institusjonalisert samarbeid eller en uformell dialog?
title_sort global miljøstyring av olje- og gassaktiviteter i arktis: et institusjonalisert samarbeid eller en uformell dialog?
publisher Institut for Statskundskab, Københavns Universitet
publishDate 2011
url https://tidsskrift.dk/politik/article/view/27472
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic Council
Arctic
Arktis
Arktis*
Global warming
genre_facet Arctic Council
Arctic
Arktis
Arktis*
Global warming
op_source Politik; Årg. 14 Nr. 1 (2011): Politik
Politik; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2011): Politik
2446-0893
1604-0058
op_relation https://tidsskrift.dk/politik/article/view/27472/24195
https://tidsskrift.dk/politik/article/view/27472
op_rights Copyright (c) 2016 Forfatteren og Tidsskriftet Politik har sammen rettighederne til materiale publiceret i Politik
container_title Politik
container_volume 14
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766304619758092288