Was It Useful? Multilayered Outcome of a Psychosocial Intervention with Teachers in East Greenland

Multilayered outcomes were found in the results of a follow-up study for an action research project conducted in East Greenland. The project was based on a community psychology approach that stresses the interdependent relations of change, structure, people, and community and emphasized the fundamen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Glendøs, Mia
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: The Outlines Association 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://tidsskrift.dk/outlines/article/view/24206
id ftsbaarhusojs:oai:ojs.tidsskrift.dk:article/24206
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsbaarhusojs:oai:ojs.tidsskrift.dk:article/24206 2024-06-23T07:52:26+00:00 Was It Useful? Multilayered Outcome of a Psychosocial Intervention with Teachers in East Greenland Glendøs, Mia 2016-08-29 application/pdf https://tidsskrift.dk/outlines/article/view/24206 eng eng The Outlines Association https://tidsskrift.dk/outlines/article/view/24206/21220 https://tidsskrift.dk/outlines/article/view/24206 Copyright (c) 2016 Outlines. Critical Practice Studies Outlines. Critical Practice Studies; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2016); 62-85 Outlines. Critical Practice Studies; Årg. 17 Nr. 1 (2016); 62-85 1904-0210 1399-5510 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed article 2016 ftsbaarhusojs 2024-06-11T04:22:51Z Multilayered outcomes were found in the results of a follow-up study for an action research project conducted in East Greenland. The project was based on a community psychology approach that stresses the interdependent relations of change, structure, people, and community and emphasized the fundamental issue of grounding an intervention in local utilization. The project focused on mobilizing the resilience of vulnerable schoolchildren by advocating the students’ perspectives in a collaborative intervention process with the teachers of a local school. The research question for the follow-up study was: What were the outcomes of the intervention project conducted with teachers of vulnerable students? In the intervention process, ideas for developing and changing practice were devised and articulated by the teachers themselves; however, implementation and change in practice did not happen linear to this process. The follow- up result of multilayered outcomes was analyzed in three main directional levels of implementation: a constructive externalization and implementation level, a generalized in-between level named forgetting-but-not-denying, and a resistance/rejection level (where no implementation occurred). The community psychology analysis and discussion of the results is supplemented with a cultural-historical theoretical dimension (primary from Jaan Valsiner) that focuses on individual processes of internalization and externalization and the different levels of integrating new knowledge. The paper summarizes crucial issues to consider in psychosocial intervention practice in order to implement change. Article in Journal/Newspaper East Greenland Greenland Aarhus University: OJS at The State and University Library Greenland
institution Open Polar
collection Aarhus University: OJS at The State and University Library
op_collection_id ftsbaarhusojs
language English
description Multilayered outcomes were found in the results of a follow-up study for an action research project conducted in East Greenland. The project was based on a community psychology approach that stresses the interdependent relations of change, structure, people, and community and emphasized the fundamental issue of grounding an intervention in local utilization. The project focused on mobilizing the resilience of vulnerable schoolchildren by advocating the students’ perspectives in a collaborative intervention process with the teachers of a local school. The research question for the follow-up study was: What were the outcomes of the intervention project conducted with teachers of vulnerable students? In the intervention process, ideas for developing and changing practice were devised and articulated by the teachers themselves; however, implementation and change in practice did not happen linear to this process. The follow- up result of multilayered outcomes was analyzed in three main directional levels of implementation: a constructive externalization and implementation level, a generalized in-between level named forgetting-but-not-denying, and a resistance/rejection level (where no implementation occurred). The community psychology analysis and discussion of the results is supplemented with a cultural-historical theoretical dimension (primary from Jaan Valsiner) that focuses on individual processes of internalization and externalization and the different levels of integrating new knowledge. The paper summarizes crucial issues to consider in psychosocial intervention practice in order to implement change.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Glendøs, Mia
spellingShingle Glendøs, Mia
Was It Useful? Multilayered Outcome of a Psychosocial Intervention with Teachers in East Greenland
author_facet Glendøs, Mia
author_sort Glendøs, Mia
title Was It Useful? Multilayered Outcome of a Psychosocial Intervention with Teachers in East Greenland
title_short Was It Useful? Multilayered Outcome of a Psychosocial Intervention with Teachers in East Greenland
title_full Was It Useful? Multilayered Outcome of a Psychosocial Intervention with Teachers in East Greenland
title_fullStr Was It Useful? Multilayered Outcome of a Psychosocial Intervention with Teachers in East Greenland
title_full_unstemmed Was It Useful? Multilayered Outcome of a Psychosocial Intervention with Teachers in East Greenland
title_sort was it useful? multilayered outcome of a psychosocial intervention with teachers in east greenland
publisher The Outlines Association
publishDate 2016
url https://tidsskrift.dk/outlines/article/view/24206
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre East Greenland
Greenland
genre_facet East Greenland
Greenland
op_source Outlines. Critical Practice Studies; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2016); 62-85
Outlines. Critical Practice Studies; Årg. 17 Nr. 1 (2016); 62-85
1904-0210
1399-5510
op_relation https://tidsskrift.dk/outlines/article/view/24206/21220
https://tidsskrift.dk/outlines/article/view/24206
op_rights Copyright (c) 2016 Outlines. Critical Practice Studies
_version_ 1802643731755565056