"For Better or Worse": Imagining Innovation in Smart City Municipal Design

The smart city concept recently (ca. 2010) emerged as a corporate-led system-as-a-service (SaaS) tool to meet city needs of accessibility and efficiency. I looked at three Western cities—Reykjavík, San José, and Toronto—to discover what it meant for city managers to meet municipal needs by embracing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kochever, Kevin M
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: SJSU ScholarWorks 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/5342
https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.ef2v-trkz
https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/context/etd_theses/article/8889/viewcontent/Kochever_sjsu_6265M_11776.pdf
id ftsanjosestate:oai:scholarworks.sjsu.edu:etd_theses-8889
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsanjosestate:oai:scholarworks.sjsu.edu:etd_theses-8889 2023-07-30T04:06:33+02:00 "For Better or Worse": Imagining Innovation in Smart City Municipal Design Kochever, Kevin M 2022-01-01T08:00:00Z application/pdf https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/5342 https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.ef2v-trkz https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/context/etd_theses/article/8889/viewcontent/Kochever_sjsu_6265M_11776.pdf unknown SJSU ScholarWorks https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/5342 doi:10.31979/etd.ef2v-trkz https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/context/etd_theses/article/8889/viewcontent/Kochever_sjsu_6265M_11776.pdf Master's Theses Urban planning text 2022 ftsanjosestate https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.ef2v-trkz 2023-07-17T19:09:20Z The smart city concept recently (ca. 2010) emerged as a corporate-led system-as-a-service (SaaS) tool to meet city needs of accessibility and efficiency. I looked at three Western cities—Reykjavík, San José, and Toronto—to discover what it meant for city managers to meet municipal needs by embracing smart initiatives. Senior-level city managers, consultants, and technologists invoked vocabularies of smartness and innovation, adopting Internet of Things (IoT) and artificial intelligence (AI) as tools to facilitate human resource and service efficiency needs. I found persistent ambiguity in how city managers described and measured outcomes for city smartness. I also found stakeholders used smartness to participate in global knowledge sharing coalitions with public and private entities, amplifying negotiation potential, and producing values of prestige around novel technological innovation. In so doing, public and private stakeholders formed individual and organizational identities around technological innovation, creating invisible tensions between human resource and technology investments, characterized by celebration of innovation work to the detriment of maintenance labors. My findings inform ongoing scholarship by explaining how smart city technologists sold a discourse of innovation that was not entirely compatible with how cities bureaucratically functioned. Such distinction is important to communicate to scholarly audiences unfamiliar with techno-fetishisms, but familiar with urban management critiques. Moreover, my study opens paths to understanding how private interests influence municipal management through more obscured means. Text Reykjavík Reykjavík San José State University: SJSU ScholarWorks Reykjavík
institution Open Polar
collection San José State University: SJSU ScholarWorks
op_collection_id ftsanjosestate
language unknown
topic Urban planning
spellingShingle Urban planning
Kochever, Kevin M
"For Better or Worse": Imagining Innovation in Smart City Municipal Design
topic_facet Urban planning
description The smart city concept recently (ca. 2010) emerged as a corporate-led system-as-a-service (SaaS) tool to meet city needs of accessibility and efficiency. I looked at three Western cities—Reykjavík, San José, and Toronto—to discover what it meant for city managers to meet municipal needs by embracing smart initiatives. Senior-level city managers, consultants, and technologists invoked vocabularies of smartness and innovation, adopting Internet of Things (IoT) and artificial intelligence (AI) as tools to facilitate human resource and service efficiency needs. I found persistent ambiguity in how city managers described and measured outcomes for city smartness. I also found stakeholders used smartness to participate in global knowledge sharing coalitions with public and private entities, amplifying negotiation potential, and producing values of prestige around novel technological innovation. In so doing, public and private stakeholders formed individual and organizational identities around technological innovation, creating invisible tensions between human resource and technology investments, characterized by celebration of innovation work to the detriment of maintenance labors. My findings inform ongoing scholarship by explaining how smart city technologists sold a discourse of innovation that was not entirely compatible with how cities bureaucratically functioned. Such distinction is important to communicate to scholarly audiences unfamiliar with techno-fetishisms, but familiar with urban management critiques. Moreover, my study opens paths to understanding how private interests influence municipal management through more obscured means.
format Text
author Kochever, Kevin M
author_facet Kochever, Kevin M
author_sort Kochever, Kevin M
title "For Better or Worse": Imagining Innovation in Smart City Municipal Design
title_short "For Better or Worse": Imagining Innovation in Smart City Municipal Design
title_full "For Better or Worse": Imagining Innovation in Smart City Municipal Design
title_fullStr "For Better or Worse": Imagining Innovation in Smart City Municipal Design
title_full_unstemmed "For Better or Worse": Imagining Innovation in Smart City Municipal Design
title_sort "for better or worse": imagining innovation in smart city municipal design
publisher SJSU ScholarWorks
publishDate 2022
url https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/5342
https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.ef2v-trkz
https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/context/etd_theses/article/8889/viewcontent/Kochever_sjsu_6265M_11776.pdf
geographic Reykjavík
geographic_facet Reykjavík
genre Reykjavík
Reykjavík
genre_facet Reykjavík
Reykjavík
op_source Master's Theses
op_relation https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/5342
doi:10.31979/etd.ef2v-trkz
https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/context/etd_theses/article/8889/viewcontent/Kochever_sjsu_6265M_11776.pdf
op_doi https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.ef2v-trkz
_version_ 1772819218191876096