AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant.

Table S1. AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay. The top 5 models are displayed, with the best model in boldface. Timing of arrival in James Bay is the response variable in all models. Departure refers to the last detection of an individual in Delaware Bay and tailwind re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sjoerd Duijns, Lawrence J. Niles, Amanda Dey, Yves Aubry, Christian Friis, Stephanie Koch, Alexandra M. Anderson, Paul A. Smith
Format: Other Non-Article Part of Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386.v2
https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/AICc_comparison_of_the_statistical_model_for_arrival_in_James_Bay_Locations_of_groupings_of_automated_telemetry_receivers_in_North_America_Estimates_of_the_relationship_between_residual_mass_relative_body_condition_and_arrival_dates_to_the_sub-Arctic_from/5501386
id ftroysocietyfig:oai:figshare.com:article/5501386
record_format openpolar
spelling ftroysocietyfig:oai:figshare.com:article/5501386 2023-05-15T14:29:33+02:00 AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant. Sjoerd Duijns Lawrence J. Niles Amanda Dey Yves Aubry Christian Friis Stephanie Koch Alexandra M. Anderson Paul A. Smith 2017-10-23T12:37:03Z https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386.v2 https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/AICc_comparison_of_the_statistical_model_for_arrival_in_James_Bay_Locations_of_groupings_of_automated_telemetry_receivers_in_North_America_Estimates_of_the_relationship_between_residual_mass_relative_body_condition_and_arrival_dates_to_the_sub-Arctic_from/5501386 unknown doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386.v2 https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/AICc_comparison_of_the_statistical_model_for_arrival_in_James_Bay_Locations_of_groupings_of_automated_telemetry_receivers_in_North_America_Estimates_of_the_relationship_between_residual_mass_relative_body_condition_and_arrival_dates_to_the_sub-Arctic_from/5501386 CC BY CC-BY Ecology Animal Behaviour automated telemetry Calidris canutus rufa departure decision migratory performance shorebirds Text Journal contribution 2017 ftroysocietyfig https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386.v2 2022-01-01T19:26:22Z Table S1. AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay. The top 5 models are displayed, with the best model in boldface. Timing of arrival in James Bay is the response variable in all models. Departure refers to the last detection of an individual in Delaware Bay and tailwind refers to the tailwind the first 3h of the trajectory.; Fig S1. Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America (see main text for details). The white dot indicates the capture site of Delaware Bay and the grey dot represents James Bay, located at the southern edge of the breeding grounds. The red dots indicate the fall detection sites of the Mingan Archipelago the Bay of Fundy. Maps created using R 3.3.3 using packages ggplot2, ggmap, raster and RgoogleMaps (image data providers: US Dept. of State Geographer © 2016); Fig S2. Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic. Birds in a higher condition at the stopover site arrive earlier at the breeding grounds. Data points are estimates of linear mixed models (see main text for details), and the gray area represents 95% confidence intervals. Other Non-Article Part of Journal/Newspaper Arctic birds Arctic Calidris canutus James Bay The Royal Society: Figshare Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection The Royal Society: Figshare
op_collection_id ftroysocietyfig
language unknown
topic Ecology
Animal Behaviour
automated telemetry
Calidris canutus rufa
departure decision
migratory performance
shorebirds
spellingShingle Ecology
Animal Behaviour
automated telemetry
Calidris canutus rufa
departure decision
migratory performance
shorebirds
Sjoerd Duijns
Lawrence J. Niles
Amanda Dey
Yves Aubry
Christian Friis
Stephanie Koch
Alexandra M. Anderson
Paul A. Smith
AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant.
topic_facet Ecology
Animal Behaviour
automated telemetry
Calidris canutus rufa
departure decision
migratory performance
shorebirds
description Table S1. AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay. The top 5 models are displayed, with the best model in boldface. Timing of arrival in James Bay is the response variable in all models. Departure refers to the last detection of an individual in Delaware Bay and tailwind refers to the tailwind the first 3h of the trajectory.; Fig S1. Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America (see main text for details). The white dot indicates the capture site of Delaware Bay and the grey dot represents James Bay, located at the southern edge of the breeding grounds. The red dots indicate the fall detection sites of the Mingan Archipelago the Bay of Fundy. Maps created using R 3.3.3 using packages ggplot2, ggmap, raster and RgoogleMaps (image data providers: US Dept. of State Geographer © 2016); Fig S2. Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic. Birds in a higher condition at the stopover site arrive earlier at the breeding grounds. Data points are estimates of linear mixed models (see main text for details), and the gray area represents 95% confidence intervals.
format Other Non-Article Part of Journal/Newspaper
author Sjoerd Duijns
Lawrence J. Niles
Amanda Dey
Yves Aubry
Christian Friis
Stephanie Koch
Alexandra M. Anderson
Paul A. Smith
author_facet Sjoerd Duijns
Lawrence J. Niles
Amanda Dey
Yves Aubry
Christian Friis
Stephanie Koch
Alexandra M. Anderson
Paul A. Smith
author_sort Sjoerd Duijns
title AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant.
title_short AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant.
title_full AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant.
title_fullStr AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant.
title_full_unstemmed AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant.
title_sort aicc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in james bay; locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in north america; estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-arctic from body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant.
publishDate 2017
url https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386.v2
https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/AICc_comparison_of_the_statistical_model_for_arrival_in_James_Bay_Locations_of_groupings_of_automated_telemetry_receivers_in_North_America_Estimates_of_the_relationship_between_residual_mass_relative_body_condition_and_arrival_dates_to_the_sub-Arctic_from/5501386
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic birds
Arctic
Calidris canutus
James Bay
genre_facet Arctic birds
Arctic
Calidris canutus
James Bay
op_relation doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386.v2
https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/AICc_comparison_of_the_statistical_model_for_arrival_in_James_Bay_Locations_of_groupings_of_automated_telemetry_receivers_in_North_America_Estimates_of_the_relationship_between_residual_mass_relative_body_condition_and_arrival_dates_to_the_sub-Arctic_from/5501386
op_rights CC BY
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386.v2
_version_ 1766303530151313408