Supplemental Figure S3. Sample composition before and after amplification bias correction from Spatial and seasonal foraging patterns drive diet differences among North Pacific resident killer whale populations

• Main Authors: Amy Marie Van Cise, Brad Hanson, Candice Emmons, Dan Olsen, Craig O. Matkin, Abigail Wells, Kim Parsons
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: unknown
• Published: 2024
• Subjects: Ecology not elsewhere classified; ecology; genetics; bioinformatics; Pacific; Shelton; Killer Whale; Killer whale
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26978488.v2; https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Supplementary_Material_from_Spatial_and_seasonal_foraging_patterns_drive_diet_differences_among_North_Pacific_resident_killer_whale_populations/26978488

Supplemental Figure S3. For each population: (Left) Amplification bias (alpha) estimated according to Shelton et al. 2022 based on mock community sequencing proportions. (Right) Effect of amplification bias correction on proportional species representation in each sample included in the study. In each plot, samples are represented by individual bars, and the proportion of each species is represented by color. Top – Proportion of each of the 10 species to be corrected in each sample, before amplification bias correction. Middle – Proportion of each of the 10 corrected species after amplification bias correction. Bottom – Proportion of all species in each sample after amplification bias correction (including species that were not corrected). Species with proportions 1% of a sample were removed from the bottom plot for ease of viewing.