Is There a Size Limit for Cosmopolitan Distribution in Free-Living Microorganisms? A Biogeographical Analysis of Testate Amoebae from Polar Areas

A long-standing debate in microbial ecology is the extent to which free-living microorganisms exhibit cosmopolitan distributions. We use a comparison of testate amoebae communities in cold "polar” locations (Arctic, Antarctic, and Tibet) to investigate how a microorganism's size affects it...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yang, Jun, Smith, Humphrey, Sherratt, Thomas, Wilkinson, David
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://doc.rero.ch/record/314081/files/248_2009_Article_9615.pdf
id ftreroch:oai:doc.rero.ch:314081
record_format openpolar
spelling ftreroch:oai:doc.rero.ch:314081 2023-05-15T14:05:09+02:00 Is There a Size Limit for Cosmopolitan Distribution in Free-Living Microorganisms? A Biogeographical Analysis of Testate Amoebae from Polar Areas Yang, Jun Smith, Humphrey Sherratt, Thomas Wilkinson, David 2018-06-18T17:49:09Z http://doc.rero.ch/record/314081/files/248_2009_Article_9615.pdf eng eng http://doc.rero.ch/record/314081/files/248_2009_Article_9615.pdf 2018 ftreroch 2023-02-16T17:31:26Z A long-standing debate in microbial ecology is the extent to which free-living microorganisms exhibit cosmopolitan distributions. We use a comparison of testate amoebae communities in cold "polar” locations (Arctic, Antarctic, and Tibet) to investigate how a microorganism's size affects its probability of having a cosmopolitan distribution. We show that the probability a given taxa being reported in all three locations increases as testate size decreases. Likewise, excluding those testates found only in Tibet, very small testates (<20μm) are more likely to occur in both the Arctic and Antarctic than in either of these poles alone. Attempting to correct for phylogeny reduces the number of statistically significant relationships—both because of decreased sample size and potentially real phylogenetic patterns, although some size-dependent effects were still apparent. In particular, taxa found in both the Arctic and Antarctic poles were significantly smaller than congeneric taxa found only in Tibet. This pattern may in part be due to habitat effects, with the Tibetan samples being more likely to have come from aquatic sites which may be more suitable for larger taxa. Overall, our analysis suggests that, at least within testate amoebae, a cosmopolitan distribution becomes increasingly common as median taxon size decreases Other/Unknown Material Antarc* Antarctic Arctic RERO DOC Digital Library Arctic Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection RERO DOC Digital Library
op_collection_id ftreroch
language English
description A long-standing debate in microbial ecology is the extent to which free-living microorganisms exhibit cosmopolitan distributions. We use a comparison of testate amoebae communities in cold "polar” locations (Arctic, Antarctic, and Tibet) to investigate how a microorganism's size affects its probability of having a cosmopolitan distribution. We show that the probability a given taxa being reported in all three locations increases as testate size decreases. Likewise, excluding those testates found only in Tibet, very small testates (<20μm) are more likely to occur in both the Arctic and Antarctic than in either of these poles alone. Attempting to correct for phylogeny reduces the number of statistically significant relationships—both because of decreased sample size and potentially real phylogenetic patterns, although some size-dependent effects were still apparent. In particular, taxa found in both the Arctic and Antarctic poles were significantly smaller than congeneric taxa found only in Tibet. This pattern may in part be due to habitat effects, with the Tibetan samples being more likely to have come from aquatic sites which may be more suitable for larger taxa. Overall, our analysis suggests that, at least within testate amoebae, a cosmopolitan distribution becomes increasingly common as median taxon size decreases
author Yang, Jun
Smith, Humphrey
Sherratt, Thomas
Wilkinson, David
spellingShingle Yang, Jun
Smith, Humphrey
Sherratt, Thomas
Wilkinson, David
Is There a Size Limit for Cosmopolitan Distribution in Free-Living Microorganisms? A Biogeographical Analysis of Testate Amoebae from Polar Areas
author_facet Yang, Jun
Smith, Humphrey
Sherratt, Thomas
Wilkinson, David
author_sort Yang, Jun
title Is There a Size Limit for Cosmopolitan Distribution in Free-Living Microorganisms? A Biogeographical Analysis of Testate Amoebae from Polar Areas
title_short Is There a Size Limit for Cosmopolitan Distribution in Free-Living Microorganisms? A Biogeographical Analysis of Testate Amoebae from Polar Areas
title_full Is There a Size Limit for Cosmopolitan Distribution in Free-Living Microorganisms? A Biogeographical Analysis of Testate Amoebae from Polar Areas
title_fullStr Is There a Size Limit for Cosmopolitan Distribution in Free-Living Microorganisms? A Biogeographical Analysis of Testate Amoebae from Polar Areas
title_full_unstemmed Is There a Size Limit for Cosmopolitan Distribution in Free-Living Microorganisms? A Biogeographical Analysis of Testate Amoebae from Polar Areas
title_sort is there a size limit for cosmopolitan distribution in free-living microorganisms? a biogeographical analysis of testate amoebae from polar areas
publishDate 2018
url http://doc.rero.ch/record/314081/files/248_2009_Article_9615.pdf
geographic Arctic
Antarctic
geographic_facet Arctic
Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
op_relation http://doc.rero.ch/record/314081/files/248_2009_Article_9615.pdf
_version_ 1766276875243487232