S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts

The discipline of seasonal climate prediction began as an exercise in simple statistical techniques. However, today the large government forecast centers almost exclusively rely on complex fully coupled dynamical forecast systems for their subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) predictions while statistical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:WIREs Climate Change
Main Authors: Judah Cohen, Dim Coumou, Jessica Hwang, Lester Mackey, Paulo Orenstein, Sonja Totz, Eli Tziperman
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.567
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:wly:wirecc:v:10:y:2019:i:2:n:e00567
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:wly:wirecc:v:10:y:2019:i:2:n:e00567 2023-05-15T15:12:00+02:00 S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts Judah Cohen Dim Coumou Jessica Hwang Lester Mackey Paulo Orenstein Sonja Totz Eli Tziperman https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.567 unknown https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.567 article ftrepec https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.567 2020-12-04T13:32:32Z The discipline of seasonal climate prediction began as an exercise in simple statistical techniques. However, today the large government forecast centers almost exclusively rely on complex fully coupled dynamical forecast systems for their subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) predictions while statistical techniques are mostly neglected and those techniques still in use have not been updated in decades. In this Opinion Article, we argue that new statistical techniques mostly developed outside the field of climate science, collectively referred to as machine learning, can be adopted by climate forecasters to increase the accuracy of S2S predictions. We present an example of where unsupervised learning demonstrates higher accuracy in a seasonal prediction than the state‐of‐the‐art dynamical systems. We also summarize some relevant machine learning methods that are most applicable to climate prediction. Finally, we show by comparing real‐time dynamical model forecasts with observations from winter 2017/2018 that dynamical model forecasts are almost entirely insensitive to polar vortex (PV) variability and the impact on sensible weather. Instead, statistical forecasts more accurately predicted the resultant sensible weather from a mid‐winter PV disruption than the dynamical forecasts. The important implication from the poor dynamical forecasts is that if Arctic change influences mid‐latitude weather through PV variability, then the ability of dynamical models to demonstrate the existence of such a pathway is compromised. We conclude by suggesting that S2S prediction will be most beneficial to the public by incorporating mixed or a hybrid of dynamical forecasts and updated statistical techniques such as machine learning. This article is categorized under: Climate Models and Modeling > Knowledge Generation with Models Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Arctic WIREs Climate Change 10 2
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description The discipline of seasonal climate prediction began as an exercise in simple statistical techniques. However, today the large government forecast centers almost exclusively rely on complex fully coupled dynamical forecast systems for their subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) predictions while statistical techniques are mostly neglected and those techniques still in use have not been updated in decades. In this Opinion Article, we argue that new statistical techniques mostly developed outside the field of climate science, collectively referred to as machine learning, can be adopted by climate forecasters to increase the accuracy of S2S predictions. We present an example of where unsupervised learning demonstrates higher accuracy in a seasonal prediction than the state‐of‐the‐art dynamical systems. We also summarize some relevant machine learning methods that are most applicable to climate prediction. Finally, we show by comparing real‐time dynamical model forecasts with observations from winter 2017/2018 that dynamical model forecasts are almost entirely insensitive to polar vortex (PV) variability and the impact on sensible weather. Instead, statistical forecasts more accurately predicted the resultant sensible weather from a mid‐winter PV disruption than the dynamical forecasts. The important implication from the poor dynamical forecasts is that if Arctic change influences mid‐latitude weather through PV variability, then the ability of dynamical models to demonstrate the existence of such a pathway is compromised. We conclude by suggesting that S2S prediction will be most beneficial to the public by incorporating mixed or a hybrid of dynamical forecasts and updated statistical techniques such as machine learning. This article is categorized under: Climate Models and Modeling > Knowledge Generation with Models
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Judah Cohen
Dim Coumou
Jessica Hwang
Lester Mackey
Paulo Orenstein
Sonja Totz
Eli Tziperman
spellingShingle Judah Cohen
Dim Coumou
Jessica Hwang
Lester Mackey
Paulo Orenstein
Sonja Totz
Eli Tziperman
S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts
author_facet Judah Cohen
Dim Coumou
Jessica Hwang
Lester Mackey
Paulo Orenstein
Sonja Totz
Eli Tziperman
author_sort Judah Cohen
title S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts
title_short S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts
title_full S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts
title_fullStr S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts
title_full_unstemmed S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts
title_sort s2s reboot: an argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.567
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.567
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.567
container_title WIREs Climate Change
container_volume 10
container_issue 2
_version_ 1766342759167295488