Human Error in Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Deployment: A System Dynamics Approach
The use of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) for various applications have grown with maturing technology and improved accessibility. The deployment of AUVs for under‐ice marine science research in the Antarctic is one such example. However, a higher risk of AUV loss is present during such endea...
Published in: | Risk Analysis |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13467 |
id |
ftrepec:oai:RePEc:wly:riskan:v:40:y:2020:i:6:p:1258-1278 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftrepec:oai:RePEc:wly:riskan:v:40:y:2020:i:6:p:1258-1278 2023-05-15T13:41:17+02:00 Human Error in Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Deployment: A System Dynamics Approach Tzu Yang Loh Mario P. Brito Neil Bose Jingjing Xu Kiril Tenekedjiev https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13467 unknown https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13467 article ftrepec https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13467 2020-12-04T13:41:21Z The use of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) for various applications have grown with maturing technology and improved accessibility. The deployment of AUVs for under‐ice marine science research in the Antarctic is one such example. However, a higher risk of AUV loss is present during such endeavors due to the extremities in the Antarctic. A thorough analysis of risks is therefore crucial for formulating effective risk control policies and achieving a lower risk of loss. Existing risk analysis approaches focused predominantly on the technical aspects, as well as identifying static cause and effect relationships in the chain of events leading to AUV loss. Comparatively, the complex interrelationships between risk variables and other aspects of risk such as human errors have received much lesser attention. In this article, a systems‐based risk analysis framework facilitated by system dynamics methodology is proposed to overcome existing shortfalls. To demonstrate usefulness of the framework, it is applied on an actual AUV program to examine the occurrence of human error during Antarctic deployment. Simulation of the resultant risk model showed an overall decline in human error incident rate with the increase in experience of the AUV team. Scenario analysis based on the example provided policy recommendations in areas of training, practice runs, recruitment policy, and setting of risk tolerance level. The proposed risk analysis framework is pragmatically useful for risk analysis of future AUV programs to ensure the sustainability of operations, facilitating both better control and monitoring of risk. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Antarctic The Antarctic Risk Analysis 40 6 1258 1278 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) |
op_collection_id |
ftrepec |
language |
unknown |
description |
The use of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) for various applications have grown with maturing technology and improved accessibility. The deployment of AUVs for under‐ice marine science research in the Antarctic is one such example. However, a higher risk of AUV loss is present during such endeavors due to the extremities in the Antarctic. A thorough analysis of risks is therefore crucial for formulating effective risk control policies and achieving a lower risk of loss. Existing risk analysis approaches focused predominantly on the technical aspects, as well as identifying static cause and effect relationships in the chain of events leading to AUV loss. Comparatively, the complex interrelationships between risk variables and other aspects of risk such as human errors have received much lesser attention. In this article, a systems‐based risk analysis framework facilitated by system dynamics methodology is proposed to overcome existing shortfalls. To demonstrate usefulness of the framework, it is applied on an actual AUV program to examine the occurrence of human error during Antarctic deployment. Simulation of the resultant risk model showed an overall decline in human error incident rate with the increase in experience of the AUV team. Scenario analysis based on the example provided policy recommendations in areas of training, practice runs, recruitment policy, and setting of risk tolerance level. The proposed risk analysis framework is pragmatically useful for risk analysis of future AUV programs to ensure the sustainability of operations, facilitating both better control and monitoring of risk. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Tzu Yang Loh Mario P. Brito Neil Bose Jingjing Xu Kiril Tenekedjiev |
spellingShingle |
Tzu Yang Loh Mario P. Brito Neil Bose Jingjing Xu Kiril Tenekedjiev Human Error in Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Deployment: A System Dynamics Approach |
author_facet |
Tzu Yang Loh Mario P. Brito Neil Bose Jingjing Xu Kiril Tenekedjiev |
author_sort |
Tzu Yang Loh |
title |
Human Error in Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Deployment: A System Dynamics Approach |
title_short |
Human Error in Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Deployment: A System Dynamics Approach |
title_full |
Human Error in Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Deployment: A System Dynamics Approach |
title_fullStr |
Human Error in Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Deployment: A System Dynamics Approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Human Error in Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Deployment: A System Dynamics Approach |
title_sort |
human error in autonomous underwater vehicle deployment: a system dynamics approach |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13467 |
geographic |
Antarctic The Antarctic |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic The Antarctic |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic |
op_relation |
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13467 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13467 |
container_title |
Risk Analysis |
container_volume |
40 |
container_issue |
6 |
container_start_page |
1258 |
op_container_end_page |
1278 |
_version_ |
1766148587356422144 |