Human Error in Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Deployment: A System Dynamics Approach

The use of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) for various applications have grown with maturing technology and improved accessibility. The deployment of AUVs for under‐ice marine science research in the Antarctic is one such example. However, a higher risk of AUV loss is present during such endea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Risk Analysis
Main Authors: Tzu Yang Loh, Mario P. Brito, Neil Bose, Jingjing Xu, Kiril Tenekedjiev
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13467
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:wly:riskan:v:40:y:2020:i:6:p:1258-1278
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:wly:riskan:v:40:y:2020:i:6:p:1258-1278 2023-05-15T13:41:17+02:00 Human Error in Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Deployment: A System Dynamics Approach Tzu Yang Loh Mario P. Brito Neil Bose Jingjing Xu Kiril Tenekedjiev https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13467 unknown https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13467 article ftrepec https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13467 2020-12-04T13:41:21Z The use of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) for various applications have grown with maturing technology and improved accessibility. The deployment of AUVs for under‐ice marine science research in the Antarctic is one such example. However, a higher risk of AUV loss is present during such endeavors due to the extremities in the Antarctic. A thorough analysis of risks is therefore crucial for formulating effective risk control policies and achieving a lower risk of loss. Existing risk analysis approaches focused predominantly on the technical aspects, as well as identifying static cause and effect relationships in the chain of events leading to AUV loss. Comparatively, the complex interrelationships between risk variables and other aspects of risk such as human errors have received much lesser attention. In this article, a systems‐based risk analysis framework facilitated by system dynamics methodology is proposed to overcome existing shortfalls. To demonstrate usefulness of the framework, it is applied on an actual AUV program to examine the occurrence of human error during Antarctic deployment. Simulation of the resultant risk model showed an overall decline in human error incident rate with the increase in experience of the AUV team. Scenario analysis based on the example provided policy recommendations in areas of training, practice runs, recruitment policy, and setting of risk tolerance level. The proposed risk analysis framework is pragmatically useful for risk analysis of future AUV programs to ensure the sustainability of operations, facilitating both better control and monitoring of risk. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Antarctic The Antarctic Risk Analysis 40 6 1258 1278
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description The use of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) for various applications have grown with maturing technology and improved accessibility. The deployment of AUVs for under‐ice marine science research in the Antarctic is one such example. However, a higher risk of AUV loss is present during such endeavors due to the extremities in the Antarctic. A thorough analysis of risks is therefore crucial for formulating effective risk control policies and achieving a lower risk of loss. Existing risk analysis approaches focused predominantly on the technical aspects, as well as identifying static cause and effect relationships in the chain of events leading to AUV loss. Comparatively, the complex interrelationships between risk variables and other aspects of risk such as human errors have received much lesser attention. In this article, a systems‐based risk analysis framework facilitated by system dynamics methodology is proposed to overcome existing shortfalls. To demonstrate usefulness of the framework, it is applied on an actual AUV program to examine the occurrence of human error during Antarctic deployment. Simulation of the resultant risk model showed an overall decline in human error incident rate with the increase in experience of the AUV team. Scenario analysis based on the example provided policy recommendations in areas of training, practice runs, recruitment policy, and setting of risk tolerance level. The proposed risk analysis framework is pragmatically useful for risk analysis of future AUV programs to ensure the sustainability of operations, facilitating both better control and monitoring of risk.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Tzu Yang Loh
Mario P. Brito
Neil Bose
Jingjing Xu
Kiril Tenekedjiev
spellingShingle Tzu Yang Loh
Mario P. Brito
Neil Bose
Jingjing Xu
Kiril Tenekedjiev
Human Error in Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Deployment: A System Dynamics Approach
author_facet Tzu Yang Loh
Mario P. Brito
Neil Bose
Jingjing Xu
Kiril Tenekedjiev
author_sort Tzu Yang Loh
title Human Error in Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Deployment: A System Dynamics Approach
title_short Human Error in Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Deployment: A System Dynamics Approach
title_full Human Error in Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Deployment: A System Dynamics Approach
title_fullStr Human Error in Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Deployment: A System Dynamics Approach
title_full_unstemmed Human Error in Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Deployment: A System Dynamics Approach
title_sort human error in autonomous underwater vehicle deployment: a system dynamics approach
url https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13467
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13467
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13467
container_title Risk Analysis
container_volume 40
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1258
op_container_end_page 1278
_version_ 1766148587356422144