Internal structure of the Green Lake 5 rock glacier, Colorado Front Range, USA

Information about the internal structure of rock glaciers is needed to understand their reaction to ongoing climate warming. Three different geophysical techniques—shallow seismic refraction, ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) and electrical resistivity tomography—were used to develop a detailed subsurf...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
Main Authors: M. Leopold, M.W. Williams, N. Caine, J. Völkel, D. Dethier
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Ice
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.706
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:wly:perpro:v:22:y:2011:i:2:p:107-119
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:wly:perpro:v:22:y:2011:i:2:p:107-119 2023-05-15T16:37:43+02:00 Internal structure of the Green Lake 5 rock glacier, Colorado Front Range, USA M. Leopold M.W. Williams N. Caine J. Völkel D. Dethier https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.706 unknown https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.706 article ftrepec https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.706 2020-12-04T13:31:03Z Information about the internal structure of rock glaciers is needed to understand their reaction to ongoing climate warming. Three different geophysical techniques—shallow seismic refraction, ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) and electrical resistivity tomography—were used to develop a detailed subsurface model of the Green Lake 5 rock glacier in the Colorado Front Range, USA. Below a thin zone of fine sediments and soils (0.7 – 1‐m thickness; 0 – 20 kΩm and 320 – 370 m s−1), a 1 – 3‐m thick zone with low p‐wave velocities (790 – 820 m s−1) and high electrical resistivity (20 – 100 kΩm) is interpreted as the ice‐free, blocky active layer with large void spaces. The data corroborate strong reflections of the GPR signals which travel at this depth at 0.11 m ns−1. A third layer that extends from depths of 1 – 3 m to about 5 m is characterised by lower electric resistivities (5 – 20 kΩm) and has lower electromagnetic wave velocities (0.65 m ns−1), representing unfrozen, finer and wetter sediments. At around 5‐m depth, the measured physical parameters change drastically (vp = 3200 – 3300 m s−1, 50 – 150 kΩm, vGPR = 0.15 m ns−1), showing an ice‐rich permafrost zone above the bedrock. This model of the internal structure was used to evaluate an existing hydrological flowpath model based on the hydrochemical properties of water outflow from the rock glacier. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ice permafrost RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 22 2 107 119
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Information about the internal structure of rock glaciers is needed to understand their reaction to ongoing climate warming. Three different geophysical techniques—shallow seismic refraction, ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) and electrical resistivity tomography—were used to develop a detailed subsurface model of the Green Lake 5 rock glacier in the Colorado Front Range, USA. Below a thin zone of fine sediments and soils (0.7 – 1‐m thickness; 0 – 20 kΩm and 320 – 370 m s−1), a 1 – 3‐m thick zone with low p‐wave velocities (790 – 820 m s−1) and high electrical resistivity (20 – 100 kΩm) is interpreted as the ice‐free, blocky active layer with large void spaces. The data corroborate strong reflections of the GPR signals which travel at this depth at 0.11 m ns−1. A third layer that extends from depths of 1 – 3 m to about 5 m is characterised by lower electric resistivities (5 – 20 kΩm) and has lower electromagnetic wave velocities (0.65 m ns−1), representing unfrozen, finer and wetter sediments. At around 5‐m depth, the measured physical parameters change drastically (vp = 3200 – 3300 m s−1, 50 – 150 kΩm, vGPR = 0.15 m ns−1), showing an ice‐rich permafrost zone above the bedrock. This model of the internal structure was used to evaluate an existing hydrological flowpath model based on the hydrochemical properties of water outflow from the rock glacier. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author M. Leopold
M.W. Williams
N. Caine
J. Völkel
D. Dethier
spellingShingle M. Leopold
M.W. Williams
N. Caine
J. Völkel
D. Dethier
Internal structure of the Green Lake 5 rock glacier, Colorado Front Range, USA
author_facet M. Leopold
M.W. Williams
N. Caine
J. Völkel
D. Dethier
author_sort M. Leopold
title Internal structure of the Green Lake 5 rock glacier, Colorado Front Range, USA
title_short Internal structure of the Green Lake 5 rock glacier, Colorado Front Range, USA
title_full Internal structure of the Green Lake 5 rock glacier, Colorado Front Range, USA
title_fullStr Internal structure of the Green Lake 5 rock glacier, Colorado Front Range, USA
title_full_unstemmed Internal structure of the Green Lake 5 rock glacier, Colorado Front Range, USA
title_sort internal structure of the green lake 5 rock glacier, colorado front range, usa
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.706
genre Ice
permafrost
genre_facet Ice
permafrost
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.706
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.706
container_title Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
container_volume 22
container_issue 2
container_start_page 107
op_container_end_page 119
_version_ 1766028025804095488