Periglacial distribution modelling with a boosting method

We assessed the applicability of a boosting method in periglacial distribution modelling using empirically derived data on cryoturbation, sporadic permafrost and sorted solifluction from an area of 600 km2 in sub‐Arctic Finland. The main aims were: (1) to compare the predictive ability of the genera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
Main Authors: Jan Hjort, Mathieu Marmion
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.629
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:wly:perpro:v:20:y:2009:i:1:p:15-25
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:wly:perpro:v:20:y:2009:i:1:p:15-25 2023-05-15T14:54:05+02:00 Periglacial distribution modelling with a boosting method Jan Hjort Mathieu Marmion https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.629 unknown https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.629 article ftrepec https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.629 2020-12-04T13:31:25Z We assessed the applicability of a boosting method in periglacial distribution modelling using empirically derived data on cryoturbation, sporadic permafrost and sorted solifluction from an area of 600 km2 in sub‐Arctic Finland. The main aims were: (1) to compare the predictive ability of the generalised boosting method used with more common parametric techniques (generalised linear model) and machine‐learning methods (artificial neural networks) and (2) to assess the tenability of the explanatory variables highlighted by the generalised boosting method. The results showed the robustness of the boosting method in predicting the distribution of periglacial phenomena in the sub‐Arctic landscape. Furthermore, the environmental factors selected by the boosting method coincided well with the expected controls of the phenomena. The strengths of the generalised boosting method lie in its high predictive ability, flexibility in capturing complex process‐environment relationships and realistic model outcomes. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic permafrost RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Arctic Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 20 1 15 25
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description We assessed the applicability of a boosting method in periglacial distribution modelling using empirically derived data on cryoturbation, sporadic permafrost and sorted solifluction from an area of 600 km2 in sub‐Arctic Finland. The main aims were: (1) to compare the predictive ability of the generalised boosting method used with more common parametric techniques (generalised linear model) and machine‐learning methods (artificial neural networks) and (2) to assess the tenability of the explanatory variables highlighted by the generalised boosting method. The results showed the robustness of the boosting method in predicting the distribution of periglacial phenomena in the sub‐Arctic landscape. Furthermore, the environmental factors selected by the boosting method coincided well with the expected controls of the phenomena. The strengths of the generalised boosting method lie in its high predictive ability, flexibility in capturing complex process‐environment relationships and realistic model outcomes. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jan Hjort
Mathieu Marmion
spellingShingle Jan Hjort
Mathieu Marmion
Periglacial distribution modelling with a boosting method
author_facet Jan Hjort
Mathieu Marmion
author_sort Jan Hjort
title Periglacial distribution modelling with a boosting method
title_short Periglacial distribution modelling with a boosting method
title_full Periglacial distribution modelling with a boosting method
title_fullStr Periglacial distribution modelling with a boosting method
title_full_unstemmed Periglacial distribution modelling with a boosting method
title_sort periglacial distribution modelling with a boosting method
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.629
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
permafrost
genre_facet Arctic
permafrost
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.629
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.629
container_title Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
container_volume 20
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15
op_container_end_page 25
_version_ 1766325776360144896