Imaging periglacial conditions with ground‐penetrating radar

Three important parameters that need to be quantified for many permafrost studies are the location of ice in the ground, the position of thermal interfaces, and spatial variations of the water content in the active layer. The data from over 100 investigations in permafrost regions demonstrate that g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
Main Authors: Brian J. Moorman, Stephen D. Robinson, Margo M. Burgess
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Ice
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.463
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:wly:perpro:v:14:y:2003:i:4:p:319-329
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:wly:perpro:v:14:y:2003:i:4:p:319-329 2023-05-15T16:37:14+02:00 Imaging periglacial conditions with ground‐penetrating radar Brian J. Moorman Stephen D. Robinson Margo M. Burgess https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.463 unknown https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.463 article ftrepec https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.463 2020-12-04T13:31:25Z Three important parameters that need to be quantified for many permafrost studies are the location of ice in the ground, the position of thermal interfaces, and spatial variations of the water content in the active layer. The data from over 100 investigations in permafrost regions demonstrate that ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) offers an effective way to measure these parameters at a scale appropriate for many process and geotechnical studies. Horizontal to gently‐dipping interfaces between unfrozen and frozen subsurface zones (such as at the base of the active layer or a suprapermafrost talik) were repeatedly detected by GPR and indicated by strong, laterally‐coherent reflections. Coherent reflections are not generated by steeply dipping thermal interfaces (greater than 45°). However, the transition from frozen to unfrozen ground can frequently be located from the radar‐stratigraphic signatures of the two units. The radar‐stratigraphic signature of excess ice in the subsurface is determined by the size of the body. Ice lenses that are smaller than the resolution of the GPR system frequently can be detected and are represented by chaotic or hyperbolic reflections, while the size of larger ice units can be resolved and is defined by distinct laterally‐coherent reflection patterns. This enables the delineation of the vertical and lateral extent of massive ice bodies, and their structural setting. By making precise measurements of the direct ground wave velocity, the water content in the near‐surface can be determined for uniform soils. It is demonstrated that by collecting a grid of GPR data the lateral variations in active‐layer water content can then be estimated. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ice permafrost Talik RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Talik ENVELOPE(146.601,146.601,59.667,59.667) Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 14 4 319 329
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Three important parameters that need to be quantified for many permafrost studies are the location of ice in the ground, the position of thermal interfaces, and spatial variations of the water content in the active layer. The data from over 100 investigations in permafrost regions demonstrate that ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) offers an effective way to measure these parameters at a scale appropriate for many process and geotechnical studies. Horizontal to gently‐dipping interfaces between unfrozen and frozen subsurface zones (such as at the base of the active layer or a suprapermafrost talik) were repeatedly detected by GPR and indicated by strong, laterally‐coherent reflections. Coherent reflections are not generated by steeply dipping thermal interfaces (greater than 45°). However, the transition from frozen to unfrozen ground can frequently be located from the radar‐stratigraphic signatures of the two units. The radar‐stratigraphic signature of excess ice in the subsurface is determined by the size of the body. Ice lenses that are smaller than the resolution of the GPR system frequently can be detected and are represented by chaotic or hyperbolic reflections, while the size of larger ice units can be resolved and is defined by distinct laterally‐coherent reflection patterns. This enables the delineation of the vertical and lateral extent of massive ice bodies, and their structural setting. By making precise measurements of the direct ground wave velocity, the water content in the near‐surface can be determined for uniform soils. It is demonstrated that by collecting a grid of GPR data the lateral variations in active‐layer water content can then be estimated. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Brian J. Moorman
Stephen D. Robinson
Margo M. Burgess
spellingShingle Brian J. Moorman
Stephen D. Robinson
Margo M. Burgess
Imaging periglacial conditions with ground‐penetrating radar
author_facet Brian J. Moorman
Stephen D. Robinson
Margo M. Burgess
author_sort Brian J. Moorman
title Imaging periglacial conditions with ground‐penetrating radar
title_short Imaging periglacial conditions with ground‐penetrating radar
title_full Imaging periglacial conditions with ground‐penetrating radar
title_fullStr Imaging periglacial conditions with ground‐penetrating radar
title_full_unstemmed Imaging periglacial conditions with ground‐penetrating radar
title_sort imaging periglacial conditions with ground‐penetrating radar
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.463
long_lat ENVELOPE(146.601,146.601,59.667,59.667)
geographic Talik
geographic_facet Talik
genre Ice
permafrost
Talik
genre_facet Ice
permafrost
Talik
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.463
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.463
container_title Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
container_volume 14
container_issue 4
container_start_page 319
op_container_end_page 329
_version_ 1766027528026193920