Economic and Ecological Evaluation of Land Use Change: Evidence from Karelia

Land use change and a shift in economic activity often bring to unpredictable consequences for local ecosystems. There is a necessity of making preliminary evaluation and analysis of comparing the different types of economic and ecological transformation, including cost and benefit analysis, not onl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anton Strokov, Ekatherine Yakubovich, Pavel Krasilnikov
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://economyofregion.ru/Data/Issues/ER2017/June_2017/ERJune2017_422_433.pdf
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2017:i:2:p:422-433
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2017:i:2:p:422-433 2023-05-15T17:01:11+02:00 Economic and Ecological Evaluation of Land Use Change: Evidence from Karelia Anton Strokov Ekatherine Yakubovich Pavel Krasilnikov http://economyofregion.ru/Data/Issues/ER2017/June_2017/ERJune2017_422_433.pdf unknown http://economyofregion.ru/Data/Issues/ER2017/June_2017/ERJune2017_422_433.pdf article ftrepec 2020-12-04T13:32:42Z Land use change and a shift in economic activity often bring to unpredictable consequences for local ecosystems. There is a necessity of making preliminary evaluation and analysis of comparing the different types of economic and ecological transformation, including cost and benefit analysis, not only for business and local population, but for the whole environment. We give an example of a particular animal husbandry farm in Karelia and show how potential change in economic specialization can be effective on a 10 years horizon. Among other land use types, we chose peat mining and wetland conservation. Each type of activities was complexly evaluated with different types of costs and benefits. In the paper, we use a method of land use change evaluation including the value of ecosystem services. The monetary values of ecosystem services are given with the respect to foreign analogues and taking into account local realities and prices. Our results have shown that the most beneficial for the society and the environment is wetland conservation, due to their berries picking service, which are highly appreciated on the market, and due to low costs for the third parties, since wetlands contain regulative and refinery services for local ecosystems. As a contrary peat mining is a profitable business, but pollutes the environment because of carbon emissions into the atmosphere. The current specialization for animal husbandry is neither an optimal solution because of low profitability of the chosen farm. The results of the research can be used for optimization in regional politics in the sphere of agriculture and environment economics in order to protect the ecological balance between human activities and nature. ecosystem services, land degradation, environmental economics, development scenarios, wetlands, peat mining, animal husbandry, comparative analysis, Karelia, Russia Article in Journal/Newspaper karelia* RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Land use change and a shift in economic activity often bring to unpredictable consequences for local ecosystems. There is a necessity of making preliminary evaluation and analysis of comparing the different types of economic and ecological transformation, including cost and benefit analysis, not only for business and local population, but for the whole environment. We give an example of a particular animal husbandry farm in Karelia and show how potential change in economic specialization can be effective on a 10 years horizon. Among other land use types, we chose peat mining and wetland conservation. Each type of activities was complexly evaluated with different types of costs and benefits. In the paper, we use a method of land use change evaluation including the value of ecosystem services. The monetary values of ecosystem services are given with the respect to foreign analogues and taking into account local realities and prices. Our results have shown that the most beneficial for the society and the environment is wetland conservation, due to their berries picking service, which are highly appreciated on the market, and due to low costs for the third parties, since wetlands contain regulative and refinery services for local ecosystems. As a contrary peat mining is a profitable business, but pollutes the environment because of carbon emissions into the atmosphere. The current specialization for animal husbandry is neither an optimal solution because of low profitability of the chosen farm. The results of the research can be used for optimization in regional politics in the sphere of agriculture and environment economics in order to protect the ecological balance between human activities and nature. ecosystem services, land degradation, environmental economics, development scenarios, wetlands, peat mining, animal husbandry, comparative analysis, Karelia, Russia
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Anton Strokov
Ekatherine Yakubovich
Pavel Krasilnikov
spellingShingle Anton Strokov
Ekatherine Yakubovich
Pavel Krasilnikov
Economic and Ecological Evaluation of Land Use Change: Evidence from Karelia
author_facet Anton Strokov
Ekatherine Yakubovich
Pavel Krasilnikov
author_sort Anton Strokov
title Economic and Ecological Evaluation of Land Use Change: Evidence from Karelia
title_short Economic and Ecological Evaluation of Land Use Change: Evidence from Karelia
title_full Economic and Ecological Evaluation of Land Use Change: Evidence from Karelia
title_fullStr Economic and Ecological Evaluation of Land Use Change: Evidence from Karelia
title_full_unstemmed Economic and Ecological Evaluation of Land Use Change: Evidence from Karelia
title_sort economic and ecological evaluation of land use change: evidence from karelia
url http://economyofregion.ru/Data/Issues/ER2017/June_2017/ERJune2017_422_433.pdf
genre karelia*
genre_facet karelia*
op_relation http://economyofregion.ru/Data/Issues/ER2017/June_2017/ERJune2017_422_433.pdf
_version_ 1766054246556368896