Borders, Boundaries, and the Politics of Petroleum Pipelines

Borders, both territorial and constitutional, have been a longstanding feature of petroleum politics in Alberta. This article suggests there is an important linkage between borders and interests. Raising borders, affirming borders, and eliminating borders may be viewed as political strategies actors...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ian Urquhart
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2017.1414622
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:34:y:2019:i:2:p:181-200
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:34:y:2019:i:2:p:181-200 2023-05-15T16:15:58+02:00 Borders, Boundaries, and the Politics of Petroleum Pipelines Ian Urquhart http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2017.1414622 unknown http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2017.1414622 article ftrepec 2020-12-04T13:41:48Z Borders, both territorial and constitutional, have been a longstanding feature of petroleum politics in Alberta. This article suggests there is an important linkage between borders and interests. Raising borders, affirming borders, and eliminating borders may be viewed as political strategies actors will seek in order to realize their preferred outcomes. These strategies have figured importantly throughout the political history of petroleum and pipeline development in Alberta. Traditionally, the debates over natural gas and oil pipeline development were the prerogative of producer, consumer, and national security concerns. Today’s pipeline debates are joined by new interests, those of environmentalists and First Nations. Throughout these debates borders have remained an important political resource. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Borders, both territorial and constitutional, have been a longstanding feature of petroleum politics in Alberta. This article suggests there is an important linkage between borders and interests. Raising borders, affirming borders, and eliminating borders may be viewed as political strategies actors will seek in order to realize their preferred outcomes. These strategies have figured importantly throughout the political history of petroleum and pipeline development in Alberta. Traditionally, the debates over natural gas and oil pipeline development were the prerogative of producer, consumer, and national security concerns. Today’s pipeline debates are joined by new interests, those of environmentalists and First Nations. Throughout these debates borders have remained an important political resource.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ian Urquhart
spellingShingle Ian Urquhart
Borders, Boundaries, and the Politics of Petroleum Pipelines
author_facet Ian Urquhart
author_sort Ian Urquhart
title Borders, Boundaries, and the Politics of Petroleum Pipelines
title_short Borders, Boundaries, and the Politics of Petroleum Pipelines
title_full Borders, Boundaries, and the Politics of Petroleum Pipelines
title_fullStr Borders, Boundaries, and the Politics of Petroleum Pipelines
title_full_unstemmed Borders, Boundaries, and the Politics of Petroleum Pipelines
title_sort borders, boundaries, and the politics of petroleum pipelines
url http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2017.1414622
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2017.1414622
_version_ 1766001825333379072