Scientific Whaling? The Scientific Research Exception and the Future of the International Whaling Commission

Whales are complex creatures with diverse capacities for intelligence, playfulness, esthetic expression, and social learning. And yet they have not been granted legal “standing” as beings with rights to this species-specific form of life. For this reason, whales continue to be hunted and killed for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachel Nussbaum Wichert, Martha C. Nussbaum
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19452829.2017.1342386
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:taf:jhudca:v:18:y:2017:i:3:p:356-369
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:taf:jhudca:v:18:y:2017:i:3:p:356-369 2023-05-15T13:44:57+02:00 Scientific Whaling? The Scientific Research Exception and the Future of the International Whaling Commission Rachel Nussbaum Wichert Martha C. Nussbaum http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19452829.2017.1342386 unknown http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19452829.2017.1342386 article ftrepec 2020-12-04T13:41:50Z Whales are complex creatures with diverse capacities for intelligence, playfulness, esthetic expression, and social learning. And yet they have not been granted legal “standing” as beings with rights to this species-specific form of life. For this reason, whales continue to be hunted and killed for both commercial and “scientific” purposes. This paper examines the whaling industry and its impact on whales’ species-specific form of life, and presents a theoretical framework for reconciling the conflicting claims of whales and human scientists. We pay particular attention to the International Whaling Commission’s 1982 moratorium on commercial whaling and the controversial “scientific” exception built into this moratorium, which allows the killing of whales for vaguely defined scientific purposes. We also focus on the 2014 International Court of Justice ruling that Japan’s program of scientific whaling in the Antarctic violated international law; Japan’s decision to continue a revised form of the program despite the ruling; and the resistance that this program has met from marine activists. Finally we argue that any theoretical framework that does justice to whale life must go beyond a utilitarian or rights-based approach, and instead must focus on the distinct capabilities of whales as they live their lives unencumbered by human killing. This approach enables us to protect spheres of choice and characteristic life-activities for whales, while also articulating what a contemporary scientific inquiry into whale life should and should not include. With this framework developed, we present policy recommendations for the International Whaling Commission, anti-whaling activists, and individual nations interested in protecting the rights of whales. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Antarctic The Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Whales are complex creatures with diverse capacities for intelligence, playfulness, esthetic expression, and social learning. And yet they have not been granted legal “standing” as beings with rights to this species-specific form of life. For this reason, whales continue to be hunted and killed for both commercial and “scientific” purposes. This paper examines the whaling industry and its impact on whales’ species-specific form of life, and presents a theoretical framework for reconciling the conflicting claims of whales and human scientists. We pay particular attention to the International Whaling Commission’s 1982 moratorium on commercial whaling and the controversial “scientific” exception built into this moratorium, which allows the killing of whales for vaguely defined scientific purposes. We also focus on the 2014 International Court of Justice ruling that Japan’s program of scientific whaling in the Antarctic violated international law; Japan’s decision to continue a revised form of the program despite the ruling; and the resistance that this program has met from marine activists. Finally we argue that any theoretical framework that does justice to whale life must go beyond a utilitarian or rights-based approach, and instead must focus on the distinct capabilities of whales as they live their lives unencumbered by human killing. This approach enables us to protect spheres of choice and characteristic life-activities for whales, while also articulating what a contemporary scientific inquiry into whale life should and should not include. With this framework developed, we present policy recommendations for the International Whaling Commission, anti-whaling activists, and individual nations interested in protecting the rights of whales.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Rachel Nussbaum Wichert
Martha C. Nussbaum
spellingShingle Rachel Nussbaum Wichert
Martha C. Nussbaum
Scientific Whaling? The Scientific Research Exception and the Future of the International Whaling Commission
author_facet Rachel Nussbaum Wichert
Martha C. Nussbaum
author_sort Rachel Nussbaum Wichert
title Scientific Whaling? The Scientific Research Exception and the Future of the International Whaling Commission
title_short Scientific Whaling? The Scientific Research Exception and the Future of the International Whaling Commission
title_full Scientific Whaling? The Scientific Research Exception and the Future of the International Whaling Commission
title_fullStr Scientific Whaling? The Scientific Research Exception and the Future of the International Whaling Commission
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Whaling? The Scientific Research Exception and the Future of the International Whaling Commission
title_sort scientific whaling? the scientific research exception and the future of the international whaling commission
url http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19452829.2017.1342386
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19452829.2017.1342386
_version_ 1766208894070161408