Some methodological issues using labour force survey data for mobility research

The paper discusses the use of Labour Force Survey (LFS) data in mobility research. Design, conceptual, statistical, and other issues are addressed. Mobility figures emanating from Icelandic LFS and tax register data are then compared. These aspects of LFS data are of interest because they illuminat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ómar Harðarson
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.step.no/reports/Y2003/1403.pdf
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:stp:stepre:2003r14
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:stp:stepre:2003r14 2023-05-15T16:49:18+02:00 Some methodological issues using labour force survey data for mobility research Ómar Harðarson http://www.step.no/reports/Y2003/1403.pdf unknown http://www.step.no/reports/Y2003/1403.pdf preprint ftrepec 2020-12-04T13:42:27Z The paper discusses the use of Labour Force Survey (LFS) data in mobility research. Design, conceptual, statistical, and other issues are addressed. Mobility figures emanating from Icelandic LFS and tax register data are then compared. These aspects of LFS data are of interest because they illuminate the differences between using survey data and register data in estimating mobility rates. The differences in actual numbers produced using the two types of data can be quite substantial. These methodological considerations are the output of a Nordic project which is dealing with the flow of human capital through job mobility in general, through researcher mobility in particular, and through migration between the Nordic countries. The project is jointly undertaken by STEP, The Danish Institute for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Statistics Finland, Statistics Iceland, and Vinnova Report Iceland RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description The paper discusses the use of Labour Force Survey (LFS) data in mobility research. Design, conceptual, statistical, and other issues are addressed. Mobility figures emanating from Icelandic LFS and tax register data are then compared. These aspects of LFS data are of interest because they illuminate the differences between using survey data and register data in estimating mobility rates. The differences in actual numbers produced using the two types of data can be quite substantial. These methodological considerations are the output of a Nordic project which is dealing with the flow of human capital through job mobility in general, through researcher mobility in particular, and through migration between the Nordic countries. The project is jointly undertaken by STEP, The Danish Institute for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Statistics Finland, Statistics Iceland, and Vinnova
format Report
author Ómar Harðarson
spellingShingle Ómar Harðarson
Some methodological issues using labour force survey data for mobility research
author_facet Ómar Harðarson
author_sort Ómar Harðarson
title Some methodological issues using labour force survey data for mobility research
title_short Some methodological issues using labour force survey data for mobility research
title_full Some methodological issues using labour force survey data for mobility research
title_fullStr Some methodological issues using labour force survey data for mobility research
title_full_unstemmed Some methodological issues using labour force survey data for mobility research
title_sort some methodological issues using labour force survey data for mobility research
url http://www.step.no/reports/Y2003/1403.pdf
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation http://www.step.no/reports/Y2003/1403.pdf
_version_ 1766039452761718784