Property rights on First Nations’ reserve land

This paper examines the economic effects of existing private property rights on First Nations’ reserves. We focus on three forms of land tenure regimes: lawful possession, designated land, and permits. These land regimes have been used to create individual land holdings, and grant, secure and transf...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernando M. Aragon, Anke Kessler
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sfu.ca/econ-research/RePEc/sfu/sfudps/dp17-14.pdf
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:sfu:sfudps:dp17-14
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:sfu:sfudps:dp17-14 2023-05-15T16:14:20+02:00 Property rights on First Nations’ reserve land Fernando M. Aragon Anke Kessler http://www.sfu.ca/econ-research/RePEc/sfu/sfudps/dp17-14.pdf unknown http://www.sfu.ca/econ-research/RePEc/sfu/sfudps/dp17-14.pdf preprint ftrepec 2020-12-04T13:31:14Z This paper examines the economic effects of existing private property rights on First Nations’ reserves. We focus on three forms of land tenure regimes: lawful possession, designated land, and permits. These land regimes have been used to create individual land holdings, and grant, secure and transferable, rights of use of reserve land to band and non-band members. Using confidential Census micro-data and rich administrative data, we find evidence of improvements in home ownership and housing conditions, as well as increments in band’s public spending. However, we do not find significant effects on household income nor employment outcomes. Instead, we document a sizeable increase in non-Aboriginal population. Our findings suggest that some caution is warranted when discussing the potential economic benefits of property rights reforms for First Nations’ communities. First Nations, property rights, lawful possession Report First Nations RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description This paper examines the economic effects of existing private property rights on First Nations’ reserves. We focus on three forms of land tenure regimes: lawful possession, designated land, and permits. These land regimes have been used to create individual land holdings, and grant, secure and transferable, rights of use of reserve land to band and non-band members. Using confidential Census micro-data and rich administrative data, we find evidence of improvements in home ownership and housing conditions, as well as increments in band’s public spending. However, we do not find significant effects on household income nor employment outcomes. Instead, we document a sizeable increase in non-Aboriginal population. Our findings suggest that some caution is warranted when discussing the potential economic benefits of property rights reforms for First Nations’ communities. First Nations, property rights, lawful possession
format Report
author Fernando M. Aragon
Anke Kessler
spellingShingle Fernando M. Aragon
Anke Kessler
Property rights on First Nations’ reserve land
author_facet Fernando M. Aragon
Anke Kessler
author_sort Fernando M. Aragon
title Property rights on First Nations’ reserve land
title_short Property rights on First Nations’ reserve land
title_full Property rights on First Nations’ reserve land
title_fullStr Property rights on First Nations’ reserve land
title_full_unstemmed Property rights on First Nations’ reserve land
title_sort property rights on first nations’ reserve land
url http://www.sfu.ca/econ-research/RePEc/sfu/sfudps/dp17-14.pdf
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_relation http://www.sfu.ca/econ-research/RePEc/sfu/sfudps/dp17-14.pdf
_version_ 1766000149596733440