Societal Culture in Iceland and Lithuania: Managerial Implications

This article contributes to cross-cultural management literature, by providing empirical data from two underresearched countries, to serve in the future as benchmark cultural shift research. Furthermore, it illustrates not only the insufficiency of mare statement of cultural dimension difference/sim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Inga Minelgaite Snaebjornsson, Ingi Runar Edvardsson, Romie F. Littrell
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244017704023
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:sae:sagope:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:2158244017704023
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:sae:sagope:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:2158244017704023 2023-05-15T16:48:21+02:00 Societal Culture in Iceland and Lithuania: Managerial Implications Inga Minelgaite Snaebjornsson Ingi Runar Edvardsson Romie F. Littrell https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244017704023 unknown https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244017704023 article ftrepec 2020-12-04T13:40:41Z This article contributes to cross-cultural management literature, by providing empirical data from two underresearched countries, to serve in the future as benchmark cultural shift research. Furthermore, it illustrates not only the insufficiency of mare statement of cultural dimension difference/similarities but also a need to contextualize them. Results indicate that Icelandic and Lithuanian societal cultures are different on three out of seven of Hofstede’s dimensions; however, these differences have considerable effect on management practices. Results also present how a similar score of the same dimension fails to explain big differences within societies regarding a particular aspect (e.g. gender gap) and suggest that societal cultural differences have implications on management practices regarding work–life balance, motivational system, organizational structure, and level of formalization. Icelanders will put more importance on leisure and will feel happier in general, whereas Lithuanians will have higher work ethics. Lithuanians will be inclined to higher need for achievement (particularly for expatriate management). More structure, formalization, hierarchy, and direct following of the regulations can be expected in Lithuania. This contribution fills the gap in the literature by comparing societal cultures of two countries that have been neglected in cross-cultural research. Both countries are undergoing societal changes and the results of this research can serve in the future as a benchmark for indication of cultural swift. Furthermore, this article outlines the practical implications of societal cultural differences for management. societal culture; Iceland; Lithuania; management; Hofstede’s dimensions; VSM08 Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description This article contributes to cross-cultural management literature, by providing empirical data from two underresearched countries, to serve in the future as benchmark cultural shift research. Furthermore, it illustrates not only the insufficiency of mare statement of cultural dimension difference/similarities but also a need to contextualize them. Results indicate that Icelandic and Lithuanian societal cultures are different on three out of seven of Hofstede’s dimensions; however, these differences have considerable effect on management practices. Results also present how a similar score of the same dimension fails to explain big differences within societies regarding a particular aspect (e.g. gender gap) and suggest that societal cultural differences have implications on management practices regarding work–life balance, motivational system, organizational structure, and level of formalization. Icelanders will put more importance on leisure and will feel happier in general, whereas Lithuanians will have higher work ethics. Lithuanians will be inclined to higher need for achievement (particularly for expatriate management). More structure, formalization, hierarchy, and direct following of the regulations can be expected in Lithuania. This contribution fills the gap in the literature by comparing societal cultures of two countries that have been neglected in cross-cultural research. Both countries are undergoing societal changes and the results of this research can serve in the future as a benchmark for indication of cultural swift. Furthermore, this article outlines the practical implications of societal cultural differences for management. societal culture; Iceland; Lithuania; management; Hofstede’s dimensions; VSM08
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Inga Minelgaite Snaebjornsson
Ingi Runar Edvardsson
Romie F. Littrell
spellingShingle Inga Minelgaite Snaebjornsson
Ingi Runar Edvardsson
Romie F. Littrell
Societal Culture in Iceland and Lithuania: Managerial Implications
author_facet Inga Minelgaite Snaebjornsson
Ingi Runar Edvardsson
Romie F. Littrell
author_sort Inga Minelgaite Snaebjornsson
title Societal Culture in Iceland and Lithuania: Managerial Implications
title_short Societal Culture in Iceland and Lithuania: Managerial Implications
title_full Societal Culture in Iceland and Lithuania: Managerial Implications
title_fullStr Societal Culture in Iceland and Lithuania: Managerial Implications
title_full_unstemmed Societal Culture in Iceland and Lithuania: Managerial Implications
title_sort societal culture in iceland and lithuania: managerial implications
url https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244017704023
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244017704023
_version_ 1766038452013367296