Constructing Peripheral Cross-Border Regions in Planning: Territory—Network Interplay in the Barents Region

This paper studies how supranational regions are built through the interplay of borders and networks. The focus is on how territory and network become manifest in planning, and in particular on the actual contexts in planning where the territorial discourse is emphasized. Conceptually, territory–n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kaj Zimmerbauer
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://epn.sagepub.com/content/46/11/2718.abstract
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:sae:envira:v:46:y:2014:i:11:p:2718-2734
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:sae:envira:v:46:y:2014:i:11:p:2718-2734 2023-05-15T15:06:11+02:00 Constructing Peripheral Cross-Border Regions in Planning: Territory—Network Interplay in the Barents Region Kaj Zimmerbauer http://epn.sagepub.com/content/46/11/2718.abstract unknown http://epn.sagepub.com/content/46/11/2718.abstract article ftrepec 2020-12-04T13:39:29Z This paper studies how supranational regions are built through the interplay of borders and networks. The focus is on how territory and network become manifest in planning, and in particular on the actual contexts in planning where the territorial discourse is emphasized. Conceptually, territory–network interplay is linked to recent discussions on relational/territorial space, multidimensionality of sociospatial relations, and thin and thick region building. The Barents Euro-Arctic Region is used here as an example, and the region's recent geoeconomic turn is studied first. The paper concludes that, despite geoeconomization, network is not dominant over territory as a key category in supranational region building. Although the contemporary (new) regionalist planning discourse emphasizes the institutionalization of network-oriented regional (economic) spaces without definitive boundaries, processes such as representing the region in branding or (re)defining who is eligible to join the official structures of cross-border cooperation entail a degree of territorial thinking and make use of the notions of boundedness and spatial symmetry. In planning practices networks commonly create the territory effect and vice versa. However, due to their different ontologies, network and territory can appear as separate or even contradictory discourses as well. territory; network; planning; Barents; borders Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic barents region RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description This paper studies how supranational regions are built through the interplay of borders and networks. The focus is on how territory and network become manifest in planning, and in particular on the actual contexts in planning where the territorial discourse is emphasized. Conceptually, territory–network interplay is linked to recent discussions on relational/territorial space, multidimensionality of sociospatial relations, and thin and thick region building. The Barents Euro-Arctic Region is used here as an example, and the region's recent geoeconomic turn is studied first. The paper concludes that, despite geoeconomization, network is not dominant over territory as a key category in supranational region building. Although the contemporary (new) regionalist planning discourse emphasizes the institutionalization of network-oriented regional (economic) spaces without definitive boundaries, processes such as representing the region in branding or (re)defining who is eligible to join the official structures of cross-border cooperation entail a degree of territorial thinking and make use of the notions of boundedness and spatial symmetry. In planning practices networks commonly create the territory effect and vice versa. However, due to their different ontologies, network and territory can appear as separate or even contradictory discourses as well. territory; network; planning; Barents; borders
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kaj Zimmerbauer
spellingShingle Kaj Zimmerbauer
Constructing Peripheral Cross-Border Regions in Planning: Territory—Network Interplay in the Barents Region
author_facet Kaj Zimmerbauer
author_sort Kaj Zimmerbauer
title Constructing Peripheral Cross-Border Regions in Planning: Territory—Network Interplay in the Barents Region
title_short Constructing Peripheral Cross-Border Regions in Planning: Territory—Network Interplay in the Barents Region
title_full Constructing Peripheral Cross-Border Regions in Planning: Territory—Network Interplay in the Barents Region
title_fullStr Constructing Peripheral Cross-Border Regions in Planning: Territory—Network Interplay in the Barents Region
title_full_unstemmed Constructing Peripheral Cross-Border Regions in Planning: Territory—Network Interplay in the Barents Region
title_sort constructing peripheral cross-border regions in planning: territory—network interplay in the barents region
url http://epn.sagepub.com/content/46/11/2718.abstract
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
barents region
genre_facet Arctic
barents region
op_relation http://epn.sagepub.com/content/46/11/2718.abstract
_version_ 1766337834666426368