Thinking through Scale: The Role of State Governance in Globalizing North Pacific Fisheries

Debates about the relationship between globalization and state power have often relied on a static view of spatial scales as discrete stages for social interaction. Focusing instead on the ‘production of scale’, several researchers have argued that globalization leads to rescaling of the state,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Becky Mansfield
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://epn.sagepub.com/content/33/10/1807.abstract
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:sae:envira:v:33:y:2001:i:10:p:1807-1827
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:sae:envira:v:33:y:2001:i:10:p:1807-1827 2023-05-15T13:09:25+02:00 Thinking through Scale: The Role of State Governance in Globalizing North Pacific Fisheries Becky Mansfield http://epn.sagepub.com/content/33/10/1807.abstract unknown http://epn.sagepub.com/content/33/10/1807.abstract article ftrepec 2020-12-04T13:36:53Z Debates about the relationship between globalization and state power have often relied on a static view of spatial scales as discrete stages for social interaction. Focusing instead on the ‘production of scale’, several researchers have argued that globalization leads to rescaling of the state, as regulatory powers are realigned both upwards to supranational regimes and downwards to regional, local, and urban governance structures. Although this perspective quite usefully treats scale as relational, this ‘glocalization’ argument remains somewhat schematic and does not allow for a full range of possible scalar configurations. Highlighting instead heterogeneity of scalar relations, in this paper I analyze the ways that United States' fishery development in the North Pacific produced both national power and transnational economic activity. After extending political jurisdiction over waters up to 200 nautical miles from shore, the United States implemented fishery development policies that emphasized the ‘Americanization’ of the Alaska pollock fishery at the expense of an international, particularly Japanese, fishery. The outcomes of these policies, however, have been international partnerships, foreign direct investment, and increased international trade, all of which have made the pollock industry simultaneously national and transnational. Efforts to assert and implement control over ocean territory produced both the national state and globalization, which were mutually reinforcing rather than antagonistic. Treating national states and the global economy as complex, contingent scalar configurations facilitates analysis of the causes of variability in state – economy relations. Article in Journal/Newspaper alaska pollock Alaska RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Pacific
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Debates about the relationship between globalization and state power have often relied on a static view of spatial scales as discrete stages for social interaction. Focusing instead on the ‘production of scale’, several researchers have argued that globalization leads to rescaling of the state, as regulatory powers are realigned both upwards to supranational regimes and downwards to regional, local, and urban governance structures. Although this perspective quite usefully treats scale as relational, this ‘glocalization’ argument remains somewhat schematic and does not allow for a full range of possible scalar configurations. Highlighting instead heterogeneity of scalar relations, in this paper I analyze the ways that United States' fishery development in the North Pacific produced both national power and transnational economic activity. After extending political jurisdiction over waters up to 200 nautical miles from shore, the United States implemented fishery development policies that emphasized the ‘Americanization’ of the Alaska pollock fishery at the expense of an international, particularly Japanese, fishery. The outcomes of these policies, however, have been international partnerships, foreign direct investment, and increased international trade, all of which have made the pollock industry simultaneously national and transnational. Efforts to assert and implement control over ocean territory produced both the national state and globalization, which were mutually reinforcing rather than antagonistic. Treating national states and the global economy as complex, contingent scalar configurations facilitates analysis of the causes of variability in state – economy relations.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Becky Mansfield
spellingShingle Becky Mansfield
Thinking through Scale: The Role of State Governance in Globalizing North Pacific Fisheries
author_facet Becky Mansfield
author_sort Becky Mansfield
title Thinking through Scale: The Role of State Governance in Globalizing North Pacific Fisheries
title_short Thinking through Scale: The Role of State Governance in Globalizing North Pacific Fisheries
title_full Thinking through Scale: The Role of State Governance in Globalizing North Pacific Fisheries
title_fullStr Thinking through Scale: The Role of State Governance in Globalizing North Pacific Fisheries
title_full_unstemmed Thinking through Scale: The Role of State Governance in Globalizing North Pacific Fisheries
title_sort thinking through scale: the role of state governance in globalizing north pacific fisheries
url http://epn.sagepub.com/content/33/10/1807.abstract
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre alaska pollock
Alaska
genre_facet alaska pollock
Alaska
op_relation http://epn.sagepub.com/content/33/10/1807.abstract
_version_ 1766175917424508928