Avoiding a “No Deal” Scenario: Free Trade Agreements, Citizenship and Economic Rights
Whilst the legal and economic challenges presented by Brexit are gradually becoming more evident, observations and recommendations are already being drawn from consequences of a “ no deal scenario” and particularly the possibilities of entering into a variant of a Free Trade Agreement which should,...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Language: | unknown |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93812/1/MPRA_paper_93812.pdf |
id |
ftrepec:oai:RePEc:pra:mprapa:93812 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftrepec:oai:RePEc:pra:mprapa:93812 2023-05-15T16:52:43+02:00 Avoiding a “No Deal” Scenario: Free Trade Agreements, Citizenship and Economic Rights Ojo, Marianne https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93812/1/MPRA_paper_93812.pdf unknown https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93812/1/MPRA_paper_93812.pdf preprint ftrepec 2020-12-04T13:32:43Z Whilst the legal and economic challenges presented by Brexit are gradually becoming more evident, observations and recommendations are already being drawn from consequences of a “ no deal scenario” and particularly the possibilities of entering into a variant of a Free Trade Agreement which should, prevent a “no deal” situation. Such a Free Trade Agreement existing between the current 28 EU Member States and the three EEA European Free Trade Association (EFTA) States Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway (EEA Internal Market) This paper, amongst other objectives, is aimed at highlighting such proposals which have been put forward to avert a “no deal scenario”. It is obvious that change – and more specifically, fundamental legislative, regulatory overhauls, will require not only the incorporation of expertise from different fields, but also time consuming and costly resources to address the demands of the transitional and implementation periods of such legislatively transformed landscapes. Certainly, a gradual process of incorporating and adapting to new regulatory and legislative changes and environments – and particularly in respect of economically sensitive related matters, would require not only thorough and dedicated observatory and monitoring periods, but also one which facilitates and encourages a process of greater democratic accountability and transparency to be incorporated into the legislative processes. Even though Brexit has generated a great degree of economic uncertainty – which has in turn presented challenges – as well as consequences, it also presents opportunities for new actors to engage and influence vital decision making aspects in areas which particularly revolve around information technology, sustainable development, innovation – as well hybrid financial instruments and volatile mediums which are embodied and personified by crypto currencies, derivatives and other complex financial instruments and mediums of exchange - all of which are reflective of a rapidly changing and evolving financial environment. The challenges now involve to a larger extent, the manner and the degree of relevance to which vital and dominating actors and institutions will be accurately represented and impact future legislation – particularly those which focus around issues relating to trade, environment and sustainable development policies. financial services; Brexit; Information Technology; innovation; e commerce; sustainability; GATS Report Iceland RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Norway |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) |
op_collection_id |
ftrepec |
language |
unknown |
description |
Whilst the legal and economic challenges presented by Brexit are gradually becoming more evident, observations and recommendations are already being drawn from consequences of a “ no deal scenario” and particularly the possibilities of entering into a variant of a Free Trade Agreement which should, prevent a “no deal” situation. Such a Free Trade Agreement existing between the current 28 EU Member States and the three EEA European Free Trade Association (EFTA) States Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway (EEA Internal Market) This paper, amongst other objectives, is aimed at highlighting such proposals which have been put forward to avert a “no deal scenario”. It is obvious that change – and more specifically, fundamental legislative, regulatory overhauls, will require not only the incorporation of expertise from different fields, but also time consuming and costly resources to address the demands of the transitional and implementation periods of such legislatively transformed landscapes. Certainly, a gradual process of incorporating and adapting to new regulatory and legislative changes and environments – and particularly in respect of economically sensitive related matters, would require not only thorough and dedicated observatory and monitoring periods, but also one which facilitates and encourages a process of greater democratic accountability and transparency to be incorporated into the legislative processes. Even though Brexit has generated a great degree of economic uncertainty – which has in turn presented challenges – as well as consequences, it also presents opportunities for new actors to engage and influence vital decision making aspects in areas which particularly revolve around information technology, sustainable development, innovation – as well hybrid financial instruments and volatile mediums which are embodied and personified by crypto currencies, derivatives and other complex financial instruments and mediums of exchange - all of which are reflective of a rapidly changing and evolving financial environment. The challenges now involve to a larger extent, the manner and the degree of relevance to which vital and dominating actors and institutions will be accurately represented and impact future legislation – particularly those which focus around issues relating to trade, environment and sustainable development policies. financial services; Brexit; Information Technology; innovation; e commerce; sustainability; GATS |
format |
Report |
author |
Ojo, Marianne |
spellingShingle |
Ojo, Marianne Avoiding a “No Deal” Scenario: Free Trade Agreements, Citizenship and Economic Rights |
author_facet |
Ojo, Marianne |
author_sort |
Ojo, Marianne |
title |
Avoiding a “No Deal” Scenario: Free Trade Agreements, Citizenship and Economic Rights |
title_short |
Avoiding a “No Deal” Scenario: Free Trade Agreements, Citizenship and Economic Rights |
title_full |
Avoiding a “No Deal” Scenario: Free Trade Agreements, Citizenship and Economic Rights |
title_fullStr |
Avoiding a “No Deal” Scenario: Free Trade Agreements, Citizenship and Economic Rights |
title_full_unstemmed |
Avoiding a “No Deal” Scenario: Free Trade Agreements, Citizenship and Economic Rights |
title_sort |
avoiding a “no deal” scenario: free trade agreements, citizenship and economic rights |
url |
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93812/1/MPRA_paper_93812.pdf |
geographic |
Norway |
geographic_facet |
Norway |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_relation |
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93812/1/MPRA_paper_93812.pdf |
_version_ |
1766043096226725888 |