Sensory Ecology of Water Detection by Bats: A Field Experiment

Bats face a great risk of dehydration, so sensory mechanisms for water recognition are crucial for their survival. In the laboratory, bats recognized any smooth horizontal surface as water because these provide analogous reflections of echolocation calls. We tested whether bats also approach smooth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Danilo Russo, Luca Cistrone, Gareth Jones
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0048144
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0048144&type=printable
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:plo:pone00:0048144
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:plo:pone00:0048144 2024-04-14T08:09:35+00:00 Sensory Ecology of Water Detection by Bats: A Field Experiment Danilo Russo Luca Cistrone Gareth Jones https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0048144 https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0048144&type=printable unknown https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0048144 https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0048144&type=printable article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:30:13Z Bats face a great risk of dehydration, so sensory mechanisms for water recognition are crucial for their survival. In the laboratory, bats recognized any smooth horizontal surface as water because these provide analogous reflections of echolocation calls. We tested whether bats also approach smooth horizontal surfaces other than water to drink in nature by partly covering watering troughs used by hundreds of bats with a Perspex layer mimicking water. We aimed 1) to confirm that under natural conditions too bats mistake any horizontal smooth surface for water by testing this on large numbers of individuals from a range of species and 2) to assess the occurrence of learning effects. Eleven bat species mistook Perspex for water relying chiefly on echoacoustic information. Using black instead of transparent Perspex did not deter bats from attempting to drink. In Barbastella barbastellus no echolocation differences occurred between bats approaching the water and the Perspex surfaces respectively, confirming that bats perceive water and Perspex to be acoustically similar. The drinking attempt rates at the fake surface were often lower than those recorded in the laboratory: bats then either left the site or moved to the control water surface. This suggests that bats modified their behaviour as soon as the lack of drinking reward had overridden the influence of echoacoustic information. Regardless of which of two adjoining surfaces was covered, bats preferentially approached and attempted to drink from the first surface encountered, probably because they followed a common route, involving spatial memory and perhaps social coordination. Overall, although acoustic recognition itself is stereotyped and its importance in the drinking process overwhelming, our findings point at the role of experience in increasing behavioural flexibility under natural conditions. Article in Journal/Newspaper Barbastella barbastellus RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Bats face a great risk of dehydration, so sensory mechanisms for water recognition are crucial for their survival. In the laboratory, bats recognized any smooth horizontal surface as water because these provide analogous reflections of echolocation calls. We tested whether bats also approach smooth horizontal surfaces other than water to drink in nature by partly covering watering troughs used by hundreds of bats with a Perspex layer mimicking water. We aimed 1) to confirm that under natural conditions too bats mistake any horizontal smooth surface for water by testing this on large numbers of individuals from a range of species and 2) to assess the occurrence of learning effects. Eleven bat species mistook Perspex for water relying chiefly on echoacoustic information. Using black instead of transparent Perspex did not deter bats from attempting to drink. In Barbastella barbastellus no echolocation differences occurred between bats approaching the water and the Perspex surfaces respectively, confirming that bats perceive water and Perspex to be acoustically similar. The drinking attempt rates at the fake surface were often lower than those recorded in the laboratory: bats then either left the site or moved to the control water surface. This suggests that bats modified their behaviour as soon as the lack of drinking reward had overridden the influence of echoacoustic information. Regardless of which of two adjoining surfaces was covered, bats preferentially approached and attempted to drink from the first surface encountered, probably because they followed a common route, involving spatial memory and perhaps social coordination. Overall, although acoustic recognition itself is stereotyped and its importance in the drinking process overwhelming, our findings point at the role of experience in increasing behavioural flexibility under natural conditions.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Danilo Russo
Luca Cistrone
Gareth Jones
spellingShingle Danilo Russo
Luca Cistrone
Gareth Jones
Sensory Ecology of Water Detection by Bats: A Field Experiment
author_facet Danilo Russo
Luca Cistrone
Gareth Jones
author_sort Danilo Russo
title Sensory Ecology of Water Detection by Bats: A Field Experiment
title_short Sensory Ecology of Water Detection by Bats: A Field Experiment
title_full Sensory Ecology of Water Detection by Bats: A Field Experiment
title_fullStr Sensory Ecology of Water Detection by Bats: A Field Experiment
title_full_unstemmed Sensory Ecology of Water Detection by Bats: A Field Experiment
title_sort sensory ecology of water detection by bats: a field experiment
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0048144
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0048144&type=printable
genre Barbastella barbastellus
genre_facet Barbastella barbastellus
op_relation https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0048144
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0048144&type=printable
_version_ 1796307073197146112