The North Atlantic Port Differentials

I. The historical background, 644. — The present adjustment, 646. — II. Summary of arguments for and against the existing system, 647. — III. The Fink Report, 651. — The Thurman Commission, 652. — Early cases before the Interstate Commerce Commission, 653. — Later cases, 655. — IV. Advantages of dis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: R. W. Harbeson
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1882811
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:46:y:1932:i:4:p:644-670.
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:46:y:1932:i:4:p:644-670. 2024-04-14T08:15:36+00:00 The North Atlantic Port Differentials R. W. Harbeson http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1882811 unknown http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1882811 article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:28:47Z I. The historical background, 644. — The present adjustment, 646. — II. Summary of arguments for and against the existing system, 647. — III. The Fink Report, 651. — The Thurman Commission, 652. — Early cases before the Interstate Commerce Commission, 653. — Later cases, 655. — IV. Advantages of distance, 657. — Terminal costs, 658. — Ocean rates, 660. — V. Probable results of equalizing rail rates, 662. — Basis of New York's dominance, 664. — Boston's difficulties, 667. — Conclusion: the differentials a special case of equalization in rate-making, 669. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Thurman ENVELOPE(-170.850,-170.850,-84.700,-84.700)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description I. The historical background, 644. — The present adjustment, 646. — II. Summary of arguments for and against the existing system, 647. — III. The Fink Report, 651. — The Thurman Commission, 652. — Early cases before the Interstate Commerce Commission, 653. — Later cases, 655. — IV. Advantages of distance, 657. — Terminal costs, 658. — Ocean rates, 660. — V. Probable results of equalizing rail rates, 662. — Basis of New York's dominance, 664. — Boston's difficulties, 667. — Conclusion: the differentials a special case of equalization in rate-making, 669.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author R. W. Harbeson
spellingShingle R. W. Harbeson
The North Atlantic Port Differentials
author_facet R. W. Harbeson
author_sort R. W. Harbeson
title The North Atlantic Port Differentials
title_short The North Atlantic Port Differentials
title_full The North Atlantic Port Differentials
title_fullStr The North Atlantic Port Differentials
title_full_unstemmed The North Atlantic Port Differentials
title_sort north atlantic port differentials
url http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1882811
long_lat ENVELOPE(-170.850,-170.850,-84.700,-84.700)
geographic Thurman
geographic_facet Thurman
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1882811
_version_ 1796313993687597056