The North Atlantic Port Differentials
I. The historical background, 644. — The present adjustment, 646. — II. Summary of arguments for and against the existing system, 647. — III. The Fink Report, 651. — The Thurman Commission, 652. — Early cases before the Interstate Commerce Commission, 653. — Later cases, 655. — IV. Advantages of dis...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1882811 |
id |
ftrepec:oai:RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:46:y:1932:i:4:p:644-670. |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftrepec:oai:RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:46:y:1932:i:4:p:644-670. 2024-04-14T08:15:36+00:00 The North Atlantic Port Differentials R. W. Harbeson http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1882811 unknown http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1882811 article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:28:47Z I. The historical background, 644. — The present adjustment, 646. — II. Summary of arguments for and against the existing system, 647. — III. The Fink Report, 651. — The Thurman Commission, 652. — Early cases before the Interstate Commerce Commission, 653. — Later cases, 655. — IV. Advantages of distance, 657. — Terminal costs, 658. — Ocean rates, 660. — V. Probable results of equalizing rail rates, 662. — Basis of New York's dominance, 664. — Boston's difficulties, 667. — Conclusion: the differentials a special case of equalization in rate-making, 669. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Thurman ENVELOPE(-170.850,-170.850,-84.700,-84.700) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) |
op_collection_id |
ftrepec |
language |
unknown |
description |
I. The historical background, 644. — The present adjustment, 646. — II. Summary of arguments for and against the existing system, 647. — III. The Fink Report, 651. — The Thurman Commission, 652. — Early cases before the Interstate Commerce Commission, 653. — Later cases, 655. — IV. Advantages of distance, 657. — Terminal costs, 658. — Ocean rates, 660. — V. Probable results of equalizing rail rates, 662. — Basis of New York's dominance, 664. — Boston's difficulties, 667. — Conclusion: the differentials a special case of equalization in rate-making, 669. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
R. W. Harbeson |
spellingShingle |
R. W. Harbeson The North Atlantic Port Differentials |
author_facet |
R. W. Harbeson |
author_sort |
R. W. Harbeson |
title |
The North Atlantic Port Differentials |
title_short |
The North Atlantic Port Differentials |
title_full |
The North Atlantic Port Differentials |
title_fullStr |
The North Atlantic Port Differentials |
title_full_unstemmed |
The North Atlantic Port Differentials |
title_sort |
north atlantic port differentials |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1882811 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-170.850,-170.850,-84.700,-84.700) |
geographic |
Thurman |
geographic_facet |
Thurman |
genre |
North Atlantic |
genre_facet |
North Atlantic |
op_relation |
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1882811 |
_version_ |
1796313993687597056 |