Ecological drivers of variation in tool-use frequency across sea otter populations

Sea otters are well-known tool users, employing objects such as rocks or shells to break open hard-shelled invertebrate prey. However, little is known about how the frequency of tool use varies among sea otter populations and the factors that drive these differences. We examined 17 years of observat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jessica A. Fujii, Katherine Ralls, Martin Tim Tinker
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru220
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:519-526.
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:519-526. 2024-04-14T08:20:54+00:00 Ecological drivers of variation in tool-use frequency across sea otter populations Jessica A. Fujii Katherine Ralls Martin Tim Tinker http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru220 unknown http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru220 article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:29:33Z Sea otters are well-known tool users, employing objects such as rocks or shells to break open hard-shelled invertebrate prey. However, little is known about how the frequency of tool use varies among sea otter populations and the factors that drive these differences. We examined 17 years of observational data on prey capture and tool use from 8 sea otter populations ranging from southern California to the Aleutian Islands in Alaska. There were significant differences in the diets of these populations as well as variation in the frequency of tool use. Sea otters at Amchitka Island, Alaska, used tools on less than 1% of dives that resulted in the capture of prey compared with approximately 16% in Monterey, California. The percentage of individuals in the population that used tools ranged from 10% to 93%. In all populations, marine snails and thick-shelled bivalves were most likely to be associated with tool use, whereas soft-bodied prey items such as worms and sea stars were the least likely. The probability that a tool would be used on a given prey type varied across populations. The morphology of the prey item being handled and the prevalence of various types of prey in local diets were major ecological drivers of tool use: together they accounted for about 64% of the variation in tool-use frequency among populations. The remaining variation may be related to changes in the relative costs and benefits to an individual otter of learning to use tools effectively under differing ecological circumstances. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alaska Aleutian Islands RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Amchitka ENVELOPE(178.878,178.878,51.567,51.567) Amchitka Island ENVELOPE(178.983,178.983,51.542,51.542)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Sea otters are well-known tool users, employing objects such as rocks or shells to break open hard-shelled invertebrate prey. However, little is known about how the frequency of tool use varies among sea otter populations and the factors that drive these differences. We examined 17 years of observational data on prey capture and tool use from 8 sea otter populations ranging from southern California to the Aleutian Islands in Alaska. There were significant differences in the diets of these populations as well as variation in the frequency of tool use. Sea otters at Amchitka Island, Alaska, used tools on less than 1% of dives that resulted in the capture of prey compared with approximately 16% in Monterey, California. The percentage of individuals in the population that used tools ranged from 10% to 93%. In all populations, marine snails and thick-shelled bivalves were most likely to be associated with tool use, whereas soft-bodied prey items such as worms and sea stars were the least likely. The probability that a tool would be used on a given prey type varied across populations. The morphology of the prey item being handled and the prevalence of various types of prey in local diets were major ecological drivers of tool use: together they accounted for about 64% of the variation in tool-use frequency among populations. The remaining variation may be related to changes in the relative costs and benefits to an individual otter of learning to use tools effectively under differing ecological circumstances.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jessica A. Fujii
Katherine Ralls
Martin Tim Tinker
spellingShingle Jessica A. Fujii
Katherine Ralls
Martin Tim Tinker
Ecological drivers of variation in tool-use frequency across sea otter populations
author_facet Jessica A. Fujii
Katherine Ralls
Martin Tim Tinker
author_sort Jessica A. Fujii
title Ecological drivers of variation in tool-use frequency across sea otter populations
title_short Ecological drivers of variation in tool-use frequency across sea otter populations
title_full Ecological drivers of variation in tool-use frequency across sea otter populations
title_fullStr Ecological drivers of variation in tool-use frequency across sea otter populations
title_full_unstemmed Ecological drivers of variation in tool-use frequency across sea otter populations
title_sort ecological drivers of variation in tool-use frequency across sea otter populations
url http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru220
long_lat ENVELOPE(178.878,178.878,51.567,51.567)
ENVELOPE(178.983,178.983,51.542,51.542)
geographic Amchitka
Amchitka Island
geographic_facet Amchitka
Amchitka Island
genre Alaska
Aleutian Islands
genre_facet Alaska
Aleutian Islands
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru220
_version_ 1796299314471895040