Nonlinear effects of group size on the success of wolves hunting elk

Despite the popular view that social predators live in groups because group hunting facilitates prey capture, the apparent tendency for hunting success to peak at small group sizes suggests that the formation of large groups is unrelated to prey capture. Few empirical studies, however, have tested f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel R. MacNulty, Douglas W. Smith, L. David Mech, John A. Vucetich, Craig Packer
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr159
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:1:p:75-82.
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:1:p:75-82. 2024-04-14T08:10:11+00:00 Nonlinear effects of group size on the success of wolves hunting elk Daniel R. MacNulty Douglas W. Smith L. David Mech John A. Vucetich Craig Packer http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr159 unknown http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr159 article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:29:33Z Despite the popular view that social predators live in groups because group hunting facilitates prey capture, the apparent tendency for hunting success to peak at small group sizes suggests that the formation of large groups is unrelated to prey capture. Few empirical studies, however, have tested for nonlinear relationships between hunting success and group size, and none have demonstrated why success trails off after peaking. Here, we use a unique dataset of observations of individually known wolves (Canis lupus) hunting elk (Cervus elaphus) in Yellowstone National Park to show that the relationship between success and group size is indeed nonlinear and that individuals withholding effort (free riding) is why success does not increase across large group sizes. Beyond 4 wolves, hunting success leveled off, and individual performance (a measure of effort) decreased for reasons unrelated to interference from inept hunters, individual age, or size. But performance did drop faster among wolves with an incentive to hold back, i.e., nonbreeders with no dependent offspring, those performing dangerous predatory tasks, i.e., grabbing and restraining prey, and those in groups of proficient hunters. These results suggest that decreasing performance was free riding and that was why success leveled off in groups with >4 wolves that had superficially appeared to be cooperating. This is the first direct evidence that nonlinear trends in group hunting success reflect a switch from cooperation to free riding. It also highlights how hunting success per se is unlikely to promote formation and maintenance of large groups. Article in Journal/Newspaper Canis lupus RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Despite the popular view that social predators live in groups because group hunting facilitates prey capture, the apparent tendency for hunting success to peak at small group sizes suggests that the formation of large groups is unrelated to prey capture. Few empirical studies, however, have tested for nonlinear relationships between hunting success and group size, and none have demonstrated why success trails off after peaking. Here, we use a unique dataset of observations of individually known wolves (Canis lupus) hunting elk (Cervus elaphus) in Yellowstone National Park to show that the relationship between success and group size is indeed nonlinear and that individuals withholding effort (free riding) is why success does not increase across large group sizes. Beyond 4 wolves, hunting success leveled off, and individual performance (a measure of effort) decreased for reasons unrelated to interference from inept hunters, individual age, or size. But performance did drop faster among wolves with an incentive to hold back, i.e., nonbreeders with no dependent offspring, those performing dangerous predatory tasks, i.e., grabbing and restraining prey, and those in groups of proficient hunters. These results suggest that decreasing performance was free riding and that was why success leveled off in groups with >4 wolves that had superficially appeared to be cooperating. This is the first direct evidence that nonlinear trends in group hunting success reflect a switch from cooperation to free riding. It also highlights how hunting success per se is unlikely to promote formation and maintenance of large groups.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Daniel R. MacNulty
Douglas W. Smith
L. David Mech
John A. Vucetich
Craig Packer
spellingShingle Daniel R. MacNulty
Douglas W. Smith
L. David Mech
John A. Vucetich
Craig Packer
Nonlinear effects of group size on the success of wolves hunting elk
author_facet Daniel R. MacNulty
Douglas W. Smith
L. David Mech
John A. Vucetich
Craig Packer
author_sort Daniel R. MacNulty
title Nonlinear effects of group size on the success of wolves hunting elk
title_short Nonlinear effects of group size on the success of wolves hunting elk
title_full Nonlinear effects of group size on the success of wolves hunting elk
title_fullStr Nonlinear effects of group size on the success of wolves hunting elk
title_full_unstemmed Nonlinear effects of group size on the success of wolves hunting elk
title_sort nonlinear effects of group size on the success of wolves hunting elk
url http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr159
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr159
_version_ 1796307694934556672