Potential risks of olfactory signaling: the effect of predators on scent marking by beavers

Mammals scent mark their territories to advertise occupancy and ownership. However, signaling with scent for territorial defense can have a negative effect by advertising an individual's presence and location to predators. In this study, we measured responses to a simulated territorial intrusio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frank Rosell, JørnIngar Sanda
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arl022
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:6:p:897-904
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:6:p:897-904 2024-04-14T08:10:12+00:00 Potential risks of olfactory signaling: the effect of predators on scent marking by beavers Frank Rosell JørnIngar Sanda http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arl022 unknown http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arl022 article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:32:00Z Mammals scent mark their territories to advertise occupancy and ownership. However, signaling with scent for territorial defense can have a negative effect by advertising an individual's presence and location to predators. In this study, we measured responses to a simulated territorial intrusion by conspecific adult male Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber) either in the localized presence or in the absence of odor of a predator to test the hypothesis that the territorial defense of free-living beavers would be disrupted by the presence of predation risk in their natural environment. We predicted that beavers would significantly reduce their willingness to countermark intruder's scent in the presence of the scent of predators (wolf [Canis lupus] and lynx [Lynx lynx]), compared with a control (no odor), as responses are in general stronger to predator scent marks than nonpredator scent. Therefore, we also predicted that the effects of nonpredatory mammal scent (neophobic control) (eland [Taurotragus oryx] and horse [Equus cabalus]) are to be expected somewhere in between the effects of the predator odor and a control. Our results suggest that both predator and nonpredator scents reduce beavers response to a simulated intruder's scent mounds and therefore disrupt their territorial defense. However, predator scent had a stronger effect than nonpredator scent. Beavers may therefore be at great risk on territories with predators present because of the trade-off between predator avoidance and territorial defense. Our study demonstrates the potential of predation risk as a powerful agent of counterselection on olfactory signaling behavior. Copyright 2006. Castor fiber; chemical communication; predation risk; scent marking; signals; territorial Article in Journal/Newspaper Canis lupus Lynx Lynx lynx lynx RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Mammals scent mark their territories to advertise occupancy and ownership. However, signaling with scent for territorial defense can have a negative effect by advertising an individual's presence and location to predators. In this study, we measured responses to a simulated territorial intrusion by conspecific adult male Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber) either in the localized presence or in the absence of odor of a predator to test the hypothesis that the territorial defense of free-living beavers would be disrupted by the presence of predation risk in their natural environment. We predicted that beavers would significantly reduce their willingness to countermark intruder's scent in the presence of the scent of predators (wolf [Canis lupus] and lynx [Lynx lynx]), compared with a control (no odor), as responses are in general stronger to predator scent marks than nonpredator scent. Therefore, we also predicted that the effects of nonpredatory mammal scent (neophobic control) (eland [Taurotragus oryx] and horse [Equus cabalus]) are to be expected somewhere in between the effects of the predator odor and a control. Our results suggest that both predator and nonpredator scents reduce beavers response to a simulated intruder's scent mounds and therefore disrupt their territorial defense. However, predator scent had a stronger effect than nonpredator scent. Beavers may therefore be at great risk on territories with predators present because of the trade-off between predator avoidance and territorial defense. Our study demonstrates the potential of predation risk as a powerful agent of counterselection on olfactory signaling behavior. Copyright 2006. Castor fiber; chemical communication; predation risk; scent marking; signals; territorial
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Frank Rosell
JørnIngar Sanda
spellingShingle Frank Rosell
JørnIngar Sanda
Potential risks of olfactory signaling: the effect of predators on scent marking by beavers
author_facet Frank Rosell
JørnIngar Sanda
author_sort Frank Rosell
title Potential risks of olfactory signaling: the effect of predators on scent marking by beavers
title_short Potential risks of olfactory signaling: the effect of predators on scent marking by beavers
title_full Potential risks of olfactory signaling: the effect of predators on scent marking by beavers
title_fullStr Potential risks of olfactory signaling: the effect of predators on scent marking by beavers
title_full_unstemmed Potential risks of olfactory signaling: the effect of predators on scent marking by beavers
title_sort potential risks of olfactory signaling: the effect of predators on scent marking by beavers
url http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arl022
genre Canis lupus
Lynx
Lynx lynx lynx
genre_facet Canis lupus
Lynx
Lynx lynx lynx
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arl022
_version_ 1796307708770516992