Net Social Expenditure, 2005 Edition: More Comprehensive Measures of Social Support

This is the 2005 edition of a Net Social Expenditure paper that contains information on net (after tax) public and private social expenditure. These indicators supplement the detailed historical information on gross (before tax) publicly mandated social expenditure in the OECD Social Expenditure Dat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Willem Adema, Maxime Ladaique
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1787/358663135802
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:oec:elsaab:29-en
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:oec:elsaab:29-en 2024-04-14T08:13:52+00:00 Net Social Expenditure, 2005 Edition: More Comprehensive Measures of Social Support Willem Adema Maxime Ladaique https://doi.org/10.1787/358663135802 unknown https://doi.org/10.1787/358663135802 preprint ftrepec https://doi.org/10.1787/358663135802 2024-03-19T10:29:55Z This is the 2005 edition of a Net Social Expenditure paper that contains information on net (after tax) public and private social expenditure. These indicators supplement the detailed historical information on gross (before tax) publicly mandated social expenditure in the OECD Social Expenditure Database by accounting for the varying roles of voluntary private social spending and the tax system on social policy across OECD countries. Government intervention through the tax system affects social spending as governments levy direct taxes and social security contributions on cash transfers, and indirect taxes on goods and services bought by benefit recipients. In addition, governments may award tax advantages similar to cash benefits and/or grant tax concessions aiming to stimulate the provision of private social benefits. Through compulsion and tax relief public policy contributes to private pension plans, and such arrangements are generally considered within the social domain. This document refines the methodological framework previously developed per earlier editions of net social expenditure and presents indicators based on a common questionnaire for twenty-three OECD countries for which information on taxation of benefits in 2001 is now available: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, the Slovak Republic, Sweden, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United States. Accounting for the impact of the tax system and private social expenditure leads to a greater similarity in social expenditure to GDP ratios across countries and to a reassessment of the magnitude of welfare states. Usually, Denmark and Sweden are seen as the biggest social spenders. After accounting for the impact of taxation social expenditure to GDP ratios appear highest in France, Germany and Sweden. Ce document est l’édition 2005 du rapport sur les Dépenses sociales nettes (après imposition) publiques et ... Report Iceland RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Canada Levy ENVELOPE(-66.567,-66.567,-66.320,-66.320) New Zealand Norway
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description This is the 2005 edition of a Net Social Expenditure paper that contains information on net (after tax) public and private social expenditure. These indicators supplement the detailed historical information on gross (before tax) publicly mandated social expenditure in the OECD Social Expenditure Database by accounting for the varying roles of voluntary private social spending and the tax system on social policy across OECD countries. Government intervention through the tax system affects social spending as governments levy direct taxes and social security contributions on cash transfers, and indirect taxes on goods and services bought by benefit recipients. In addition, governments may award tax advantages similar to cash benefits and/or grant tax concessions aiming to stimulate the provision of private social benefits. Through compulsion and tax relief public policy contributes to private pension plans, and such arrangements are generally considered within the social domain. This document refines the methodological framework previously developed per earlier editions of net social expenditure and presents indicators based on a common questionnaire for twenty-three OECD countries for which information on taxation of benefits in 2001 is now available: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, the Slovak Republic, Sweden, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United States. Accounting for the impact of the tax system and private social expenditure leads to a greater similarity in social expenditure to GDP ratios across countries and to a reassessment of the magnitude of welfare states. Usually, Denmark and Sweden are seen as the biggest social spenders. After accounting for the impact of taxation social expenditure to GDP ratios appear highest in France, Germany and Sweden. Ce document est l’édition 2005 du rapport sur les Dépenses sociales nettes (après imposition) publiques et ...
format Report
author Willem Adema
Maxime Ladaique
spellingShingle Willem Adema
Maxime Ladaique
Net Social Expenditure, 2005 Edition: More Comprehensive Measures of Social Support
author_facet Willem Adema
Maxime Ladaique
author_sort Willem Adema
title Net Social Expenditure, 2005 Edition: More Comprehensive Measures of Social Support
title_short Net Social Expenditure, 2005 Edition: More Comprehensive Measures of Social Support
title_full Net Social Expenditure, 2005 Edition: More Comprehensive Measures of Social Support
title_fullStr Net Social Expenditure, 2005 Edition: More Comprehensive Measures of Social Support
title_full_unstemmed Net Social Expenditure, 2005 Edition: More Comprehensive Measures of Social Support
title_sort net social expenditure, 2005 edition: more comprehensive measures of social support
url https://doi.org/10.1787/358663135802
long_lat ENVELOPE(-66.567,-66.567,-66.320,-66.320)
geographic Canada
Levy
New Zealand
Norway
geographic_facet Canada
Levy
New Zealand
Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1787/358663135802
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1787/358663135802
_version_ 1796311940678549504