Russian Administrative Reform: Better Outcomes through Broader Participation

The following paper deals with the issue of the Russian administrative reform of the 2000s. The subject of analysis is the relationship between the extent of inclusivity in the reform process and its outcomes. To study this relationship we start by focusing on the federal stage of the reforms design...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexander Sungurov, Daniil Tiniakov
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://vgmu.hse.ru/data/2018/03/05/1165857755/Sungurov,%20Tiniakov%205-2018.pdf
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2018:i:5:p:133-144
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2018:i:5:p:133-144 2024-04-14T08:18:45+00:00 Russian Administrative Reform: Better Outcomes through Broader Participation Alexander Sungurov Daniil Tiniakov http://vgmu.hse.ru/data/2018/03/05/1165857755/Sungurov,%20Tiniakov%205-2018.pdf unknown http://vgmu.hse.ru/data/2018/03/05/1165857755/Sungurov,%20Tiniakov%205-2018.pdf article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:27:41Z The following paper deals with the issue of the Russian administrative reform of the 2000s. The subject of analysis is the relationship between the extent of inclusivity in the reform process and its outcomes. To study this relationship we start by focusing on the federal stage of the reforms design, outlining institutions, involved actors and their strategies. We claim that due to the closed nature of the reform, its official Conception was highly incoherent. Following this, we turn our attention to the implementation of the reform in the Russian regions. We illustrate this process by outlining one case of the reform in the Republic of Karelia, based on interviews with representatives of bureaucracy, civil society and the expert community. Here we also demonstrate that greater engagement by interested groups results in better implementation of reform. Then we introduce simple regression to trace the relationship between two major directions of administrative reform - one based on the new public management idea of cost efficiency and the other grounded in the public governance call for greater community participation. Our model shows that these directions are hugely contradictory due to the logical incoherent Conception of the reform. We suggest some possible solutions to deal with this problem to some extent, which will require an even broader set of actors involved in the reform process. Therefore, looking at examples from the federal and regional dimensions of the Russian administrative reform, we argue that a more open regime with in a policy subsystem with a broader circle of participating actors will lead to a more coherent content of policy change and better implementation of the initial conception. administrative reform, Russian administrative reform, participation in reform process, regional level of administrative reform, administrative paradigms, federal conception of the administrative reform Article in Journal/Newspaper Republic of Karelia RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description The following paper deals with the issue of the Russian administrative reform of the 2000s. The subject of analysis is the relationship between the extent of inclusivity in the reform process and its outcomes. To study this relationship we start by focusing on the federal stage of the reforms design, outlining institutions, involved actors and their strategies. We claim that due to the closed nature of the reform, its official Conception was highly incoherent. Following this, we turn our attention to the implementation of the reform in the Russian regions. We illustrate this process by outlining one case of the reform in the Republic of Karelia, based on interviews with representatives of bureaucracy, civil society and the expert community. Here we also demonstrate that greater engagement by interested groups results in better implementation of reform. Then we introduce simple regression to trace the relationship between two major directions of administrative reform - one based on the new public management idea of cost efficiency and the other grounded in the public governance call for greater community participation. Our model shows that these directions are hugely contradictory due to the logical incoherent Conception of the reform. We suggest some possible solutions to deal with this problem to some extent, which will require an even broader set of actors involved in the reform process. Therefore, looking at examples from the federal and regional dimensions of the Russian administrative reform, we argue that a more open regime with in a policy subsystem with a broader circle of participating actors will lead to a more coherent content of policy change and better implementation of the initial conception. administrative reform, Russian administrative reform, participation in reform process, regional level of administrative reform, administrative paradigms, federal conception of the administrative reform
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Alexander Sungurov
Daniil Tiniakov
spellingShingle Alexander Sungurov
Daniil Tiniakov
Russian Administrative Reform: Better Outcomes through Broader Participation
author_facet Alexander Sungurov
Daniil Tiniakov
author_sort Alexander Sungurov
title Russian Administrative Reform: Better Outcomes through Broader Participation
title_short Russian Administrative Reform: Better Outcomes through Broader Participation
title_full Russian Administrative Reform: Better Outcomes through Broader Participation
title_fullStr Russian Administrative Reform: Better Outcomes through Broader Participation
title_full_unstemmed Russian Administrative Reform: Better Outcomes through Broader Participation
title_sort russian administrative reform: better outcomes through broader participation
url http://vgmu.hse.ru/data/2018/03/05/1165857755/Sungurov,%20Tiniakov%205-2018.pdf
genre Republic of Karelia
genre_facet Republic of Karelia
op_relation http://vgmu.hse.ru/data/2018/03/05/1165857755/Sungurov,%20Tiniakov%205-2018.pdf
_version_ 1796318299966930944