Global Climate Control: Is There a Better Strategy Than Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions?

Many environmentalists and some developed nations appear to have concluded that there is one Many environmentalists and some developed nations appear to have concluded that there is one climate change problem, global warming, and that there is only one solution to it, reducing greenhouse gas emissio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alan Carlin
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.epa.gov/environmental-economics/working-paper-global-climate-control-there-better-strategy-reducing
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:nev:wpaper:wp200604
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:nev:wpaper:wp200604 2024-04-14T08:17:37+00:00 Global Climate Control: Is There a Better Strategy Than Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Alan Carlin https://www.epa.gov/environmental-economics/working-paper-global-climate-control-there-better-strategy-reducing unknown https://www.epa.gov/environmental-economics/working-paper-global-climate-control-there-better-strategy-reducing preprint ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:25:57Z Many environmentalists and some developed nations appear to have concluded that there is one Many environmentalists and some developed nations appear to have concluded that there is one climate change problem, global warming, and that there is only one solution to it, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, usually through the Kyoto Protocol. This paper argues instead that there are actually four major inter-related problems and concludes that several different approaches, including engineered climate selection, would be required to solve all of them. Although some measures can address certain climate change problems, none can address all of them. The paper first reviews the four major climate change problems, analyses whether the most prominent of the greenhouse gas control approaches (the Kyoto Protocol) is likely to be either effective or efficient in solving them, and then analyses both management and technological alternatives to this approach. The paper concludes that the most efficient and effective approach would be to actively pursue both engineered climate selection approaches involving radiative forcing using stratospheric particles optimized for this purpose as well as a new effort to reduce ocean acidification, with immediate priority given to the former in order to solve all the non-ocean acidification problems quickly while the more difficult, much slower, and much more costly effort to reduce ocean acidification is analyzed and carried out. This two-fold approach could be used to rapidly reduce the risks from adverse feedback/tipping point problems from global warming and from global cooling from major volcanic eruptions, and to rapidly stabilize average global temperatures at any desired level. This should also allow a little time for a new effort to better understand ocean acidification and design and carry out a careful program to reduce it directly, or possibly to decrease the carbon dioxide levels themselves to the extent that this is the most effective and lowest cost approach. If the latter, ... Report Ocean acidification RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Many environmentalists and some developed nations appear to have concluded that there is one Many environmentalists and some developed nations appear to have concluded that there is one climate change problem, global warming, and that there is only one solution to it, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, usually through the Kyoto Protocol. This paper argues instead that there are actually four major inter-related problems and concludes that several different approaches, including engineered climate selection, would be required to solve all of them. Although some measures can address certain climate change problems, none can address all of them. The paper first reviews the four major climate change problems, analyses whether the most prominent of the greenhouse gas control approaches (the Kyoto Protocol) is likely to be either effective or efficient in solving them, and then analyses both management and technological alternatives to this approach. The paper concludes that the most efficient and effective approach would be to actively pursue both engineered climate selection approaches involving radiative forcing using stratospheric particles optimized for this purpose as well as a new effort to reduce ocean acidification, with immediate priority given to the former in order to solve all the non-ocean acidification problems quickly while the more difficult, much slower, and much more costly effort to reduce ocean acidification is analyzed and carried out. This two-fold approach could be used to rapidly reduce the risks from adverse feedback/tipping point problems from global warming and from global cooling from major volcanic eruptions, and to rapidly stabilize average global temperatures at any desired level. This should also allow a little time for a new effort to better understand ocean acidification and design and carry out a careful program to reduce it directly, or possibly to decrease the carbon dioxide levels themselves to the extent that this is the most effective and lowest cost approach. If the latter, ...
format Report
author Alan Carlin
spellingShingle Alan Carlin
Global Climate Control: Is There a Better Strategy Than Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions?
author_facet Alan Carlin
author_sort Alan Carlin
title Global Climate Control: Is There a Better Strategy Than Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions?
title_short Global Climate Control: Is There a Better Strategy Than Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions?
title_full Global Climate Control: Is There a Better Strategy Than Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions?
title_fullStr Global Climate Control: Is There a Better Strategy Than Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions?
title_full_unstemmed Global Climate Control: Is There a Better Strategy Than Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions?
title_sort global climate control: is there a better strategy than reducing greenhouse gas emissions?
url https://www.epa.gov/environmental-economics/working-paper-global-climate-control-there-better-strategy-reducing
genre Ocean acidification
genre_facet Ocean acidification
op_relation https://www.epa.gov/environmental-economics/working-paper-global-climate-control-there-better-strategy-reducing
_version_ 1796316842172612608