Marginal Valuation of Charismatic Species: Implications for Conservation

Most contingent valuation studies focus on total willingness to pay (WTP) as a measure of welfare change. For policy involving species preservation, however, it is important to distinguish between the benefits of preventing a species from going extinct and the benefits of preserving numbers above th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erwin Bulte, G. van Kooten
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1008309816658
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:kap:enreec:v:14:y:1999:i:1:p:119-130
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:kap:enreec:v:14:y:1999:i:1:p:119-130 2024-04-14T08:16:27+00:00 Marginal Valuation of Charismatic Species: Implications for Conservation Erwin Bulte G. van Kooten http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1008309816658 unknown http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1008309816658 article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:35:23Z Most contingent valuation studies focus on total willingness to pay (WTP) as a measure of welfare change. For policy involving species preservation, however, it is important to distinguish between the benefits of preventing a species from going extinct and the benefits of preserving numbers above the minimum viable population (MVP) level. Once MVP is exceeded, marginal WTP becomes relevant. These propositions are illustrated for the case of one charismatic species whose management is much debated, minke whales in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean. It is shown that, for a given estimate of total preservation value, strict conservation and extinction can both be optimal. This finding highlights the importance of collecting marginal values in contingent valuation surveys. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999 preservation of minke whales, marginal willingness to pay, value of minimum viable population Article in Journal/Newspaper Northeast Atlantic RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Most contingent valuation studies focus on total willingness to pay (WTP) as a measure of welfare change. For policy involving species preservation, however, it is important to distinguish between the benefits of preventing a species from going extinct and the benefits of preserving numbers above the minimum viable population (MVP) level. Once MVP is exceeded, marginal WTP becomes relevant. These propositions are illustrated for the case of one charismatic species whose management is much debated, minke whales in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean. It is shown that, for a given estimate of total preservation value, strict conservation and extinction can both be optimal. This finding highlights the importance of collecting marginal values in contingent valuation surveys. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999 preservation of minke whales, marginal willingness to pay, value of minimum viable population
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Erwin Bulte
G. van Kooten
spellingShingle Erwin Bulte
G. van Kooten
Marginal Valuation of Charismatic Species: Implications for Conservation
author_facet Erwin Bulte
G. van Kooten
author_sort Erwin Bulte
title Marginal Valuation of Charismatic Species: Implications for Conservation
title_short Marginal Valuation of Charismatic Species: Implications for Conservation
title_full Marginal Valuation of Charismatic Species: Implications for Conservation
title_fullStr Marginal Valuation of Charismatic Species: Implications for Conservation
title_full_unstemmed Marginal Valuation of Charismatic Species: Implications for Conservation
title_sort marginal valuation of charismatic species: implications for conservation
url http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1008309816658
genre Northeast Atlantic
genre_facet Northeast Atlantic
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1008309816658
_version_ 1796315125568765952