Marginal Valuation of Charismatic Species: Implications for Conservation
Most contingent valuation studies focus on total willingness to pay (WTP) as a measure of welfare change. For policy involving species preservation, however, it is important to distinguish between the benefits of preventing a species from going extinct and the benefits of preserving numbers above th...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1008309816658 |
id |
ftrepec:oai:RePEc:kap:enreec:v:14:y:1999:i:1:p:119-130 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftrepec:oai:RePEc:kap:enreec:v:14:y:1999:i:1:p:119-130 2024-04-14T08:16:27+00:00 Marginal Valuation of Charismatic Species: Implications for Conservation Erwin Bulte G. van Kooten http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1008309816658 unknown http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1008309816658 article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:35:23Z Most contingent valuation studies focus on total willingness to pay (WTP) as a measure of welfare change. For policy involving species preservation, however, it is important to distinguish between the benefits of preventing a species from going extinct and the benefits of preserving numbers above the minimum viable population (MVP) level. Once MVP is exceeded, marginal WTP becomes relevant. These propositions are illustrated for the case of one charismatic species whose management is much debated, minke whales in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean. It is shown that, for a given estimate of total preservation value, strict conservation and extinction can both be optimal. This finding highlights the importance of collecting marginal values in contingent valuation surveys. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999 preservation of minke whales, marginal willingness to pay, value of minimum viable population Article in Journal/Newspaper Northeast Atlantic RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) |
op_collection_id |
ftrepec |
language |
unknown |
description |
Most contingent valuation studies focus on total willingness to pay (WTP) as a measure of welfare change. For policy involving species preservation, however, it is important to distinguish between the benefits of preventing a species from going extinct and the benefits of preserving numbers above the minimum viable population (MVP) level. Once MVP is exceeded, marginal WTP becomes relevant. These propositions are illustrated for the case of one charismatic species whose management is much debated, minke whales in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean. It is shown that, for a given estimate of total preservation value, strict conservation and extinction can both be optimal. This finding highlights the importance of collecting marginal values in contingent valuation surveys. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999 preservation of minke whales, marginal willingness to pay, value of minimum viable population |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Erwin Bulte G. van Kooten |
spellingShingle |
Erwin Bulte G. van Kooten Marginal Valuation of Charismatic Species: Implications for Conservation |
author_facet |
Erwin Bulte G. van Kooten |
author_sort |
Erwin Bulte |
title |
Marginal Valuation of Charismatic Species: Implications for Conservation |
title_short |
Marginal Valuation of Charismatic Species: Implications for Conservation |
title_full |
Marginal Valuation of Charismatic Species: Implications for Conservation |
title_fullStr |
Marginal Valuation of Charismatic Species: Implications for Conservation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Marginal Valuation of Charismatic Species: Implications for Conservation |
title_sort |
marginal valuation of charismatic species: implications for conservation |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1008309816658 |
genre |
Northeast Atlantic |
genre_facet |
Northeast Atlantic |
op_relation |
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1008309816658 |
_version_ |
1796315125568765952 |