EMU and the Icelandic labour market

In this paper we look at the costs and benefits for Iceland from joining the EMU from a labour-market perspective. We conclude that none of Mundell's three criteria for an optimal currency area are at present fulfilled for Iceland and the initial Euro zone. Shocks to the Icelandic economy are f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sveinn Agnarsson, Axel Hall, Tryggvi Thor Herbertsson, Sigurður Ingólfsson, Gylfi Magnússon, Gylfi Zoega
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sedlabanki.is/uploads/files/Wp3.PDF
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:ice:wpaper:wp03
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:ice:wpaper:wp03 2024-04-14T08:13:27+00:00 EMU and the Icelandic labour market Sveinn Agnarsson Axel Hall Tryggvi Thor Herbertsson Sigurður Ingólfsson Gylfi Magnússon Gylfi Zoega http://www.sedlabanki.is/uploads/files/Wp3.PDF unknown http://www.sedlabanki.is/uploads/files/Wp3.PDF preprint ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:36:11Z In this paper we look at the costs and benefits for Iceland from joining the EMU from a labour-market perspective. We conclude that none of Mundell's three criteria for an optimal currency area are at present fulfilled for Iceland and the initial Euro zone. Shocks to the Icelandic economy are found to be asymmetric with those experienced in other countries, nominal wages rigid, and migration limited. The painful adjustment of the Faeroese economy to macroeconomic shocks in the early 1990s suggests that the disadvantages of not having a separate currency can be substantial if nominal wages are rigid. Substantial variation in labour market participation and frequent adjustments of the exchange rate seem to have held unemployment in check in Iceland, at least until around 1988. Report Iceland RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description In this paper we look at the costs and benefits for Iceland from joining the EMU from a labour-market perspective. We conclude that none of Mundell's three criteria for an optimal currency area are at present fulfilled for Iceland and the initial Euro zone. Shocks to the Icelandic economy are found to be asymmetric with those experienced in other countries, nominal wages rigid, and migration limited. The painful adjustment of the Faeroese economy to macroeconomic shocks in the early 1990s suggests that the disadvantages of not having a separate currency can be substantial if nominal wages are rigid. Substantial variation in labour market participation and frequent adjustments of the exchange rate seem to have held unemployment in check in Iceland, at least until around 1988.
format Report
author Sveinn Agnarsson
Axel Hall
Tryggvi Thor Herbertsson
Sigurður Ingólfsson
Gylfi Magnússon
Gylfi Zoega
spellingShingle Sveinn Agnarsson
Axel Hall
Tryggvi Thor Herbertsson
Sigurður Ingólfsson
Gylfi Magnússon
Gylfi Zoega
EMU and the Icelandic labour market
author_facet Sveinn Agnarsson
Axel Hall
Tryggvi Thor Herbertsson
Sigurður Ingólfsson
Gylfi Magnússon
Gylfi Zoega
author_sort Sveinn Agnarsson
title EMU and the Icelandic labour market
title_short EMU and the Icelandic labour market
title_full EMU and the Icelandic labour market
title_fullStr EMU and the Icelandic labour market
title_full_unstemmed EMU and the Icelandic labour market
title_sort emu and the icelandic labour market
url http://www.sedlabanki.is/uploads/files/Wp3.PDF
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation http://www.sedlabanki.is/uploads/files/Wp3.PDF
_version_ 1796311430856704000