Archaeological Surveying of Subarctic and Arctic Landscapes: Comparing the Performance of Airborne Laser Scanning and Remote Sensing Image Data

What can remote sensing contribute to archaeological surveying in subarctic and arctic landscapes? The pros and cons of remote sensing data vary as do areas of utilization and methodological approaches. We assessed the applicability of remote sensing for archaeological surveying of northern landscap...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alma Elizabeth Thuestad, Ole Risbøl, Jan Ingolf Kleppe, Stine Barlindhaug, Elin Rose Myrvoll
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1917-:d:497411
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1917-:d:497411 2024-04-14T08:07:29+00:00 Archaeological Surveying of Subarctic and Arctic Landscapes: Comparing the Performance of Airborne Laser Scanning and Remote Sensing Image Data Alma Elizabeth Thuestad Ole Risbøl Jan Ingolf Kleppe Stine Barlindhaug Elin Rose Myrvoll https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/ unknown https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/ article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:39:52Z What can remote sensing contribute to archaeological surveying in subarctic and arctic landscapes? The pros and cons of remote sensing data vary as do areas of utilization and methodological approaches. We assessed the applicability of remote sensing for archaeological surveying of northern landscapes using airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) and satellite and aerial images to map archaeological features as a basis for (a) assessing the pros and cons of the different approaches and (b) assessing the potential detection rate of remote sensing. Interpretation of images and a LiDAR-based bare-earth digital terrain model (DTM) was based on visual analyses aided by processing and visualizing techniques. 368 features were identified in the aerial images, 437 in the satellite images and 1186 in the DTM. LiDAR yielded the better result, especially for hunting pits. Image data proved suitable for dwellings and settlement sites. Feature characteristics proved a key factor for detectability, both in LiDAR and image data. This study has shown that LiDAR and remote sensing image data are highly applicable for archaeological surveying in northern landscapes. It showed that a multi-sensor approach contributes to high detection rates. Our results have improved the inventory of archaeological sites in a non-destructive and minimally invasive manner. cultural heritage; LiDAR; satellite image; aerial image; High North Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Subarctic RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description What can remote sensing contribute to archaeological surveying in subarctic and arctic landscapes? The pros and cons of remote sensing data vary as do areas of utilization and methodological approaches. We assessed the applicability of remote sensing for archaeological surveying of northern landscapes using airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) and satellite and aerial images to map archaeological features as a basis for (a) assessing the pros and cons of the different approaches and (b) assessing the potential detection rate of remote sensing. Interpretation of images and a LiDAR-based bare-earth digital terrain model (DTM) was based on visual analyses aided by processing and visualizing techniques. 368 features were identified in the aerial images, 437 in the satellite images and 1186 in the DTM. LiDAR yielded the better result, especially for hunting pits. Image data proved suitable for dwellings and settlement sites. Feature characteristics proved a key factor for detectability, both in LiDAR and image data. This study has shown that LiDAR and remote sensing image data are highly applicable for archaeological surveying in northern landscapes. It showed that a multi-sensor approach contributes to high detection rates. Our results have improved the inventory of archaeological sites in a non-destructive and minimally invasive manner. cultural heritage; LiDAR; satellite image; aerial image; High North
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Alma Elizabeth Thuestad
Ole Risbøl
Jan Ingolf Kleppe
Stine Barlindhaug
Elin Rose Myrvoll
spellingShingle Alma Elizabeth Thuestad
Ole Risbøl
Jan Ingolf Kleppe
Stine Barlindhaug
Elin Rose Myrvoll
Archaeological Surveying of Subarctic and Arctic Landscapes: Comparing the Performance of Airborne Laser Scanning and Remote Sensing Image Data
author_facet Alma Elizabeth Thuestad
Ole Risbøl
Jan Ingolf Kleppe
Stine Barlindhaug
Elin Rose Myrvoll
author_sort Alma Elizabeth Thuestad
title Archaeological Surveying of Subarctic and Arctic Landscapes: Comparing the Performance of Airborne Laser Scanning and Remote Sensing Image Data
title_short Archaeological Surveying of Subarctic and Arctic Landscapes: Comparing the Performance of Airborne Laser Scanning and Remote Sensing Image Data
title_full Archaeological Surveying of Subarctic and Arctic Landscapes: Comparing the Performance of Airborne Laser Scanning and Remote Sensing Image Data
title_fullStr Archaeological Surveying of Subarctic and Arctic Landscapes: Comparing the Performance of Airborne Laser Scanning and Remote Sensing Image Data
title_full_unstemmed Archaeological Surveying of Subarctic and Arctic Landscapes: Comparing the Performance of Airborne Laser Scanning and Remote Sensing Image Data
title_sort archaeological surveying of subarctic and arctic landscapes: comparing the performance of airborne laser scanning and remote sensing image data
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Subarctic
genre_facet Arctic
Subarctic
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/
_version_ 1796304882960957440