Archaeological Surveying of Subarctic and Arctic Landscapes: Comparing the Performance of Airborne Laser Scanning and Remote Sensing Image Data
What can remote sensing contribute to archaeological surveying in subarctic and arctic landscapes? The pros and cons of remote sensing data vary as do areas of utilization and methodological approaches. We assessed the applicability of remote sensing for archaeological surveying of northern landscap...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/ |
id |
ftrepec:oai:RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1917-:d:497411 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftrepec:oai:RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1917-:d:497411 2024-04-14T08:07:29+00:00 Archaeological Surveying of Subarctic and Arctic Landscapes: Comparing the Performance of Airborne Laser Scanning and Remote Sensing Image Data Alma Elizabeth Thuestad Ole Risbøl Jan Ingolf Kleppe Stine Barlindhaug Elin Rose Myrvoll https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/ unknown https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/ article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:39:52Z What can remote sensing contribute to archaeological surveying in subarctic and arctic landscapes? The pros and cons of remote sensing data vary as do areas of utilization and methodological approaches. We assessed the applicability of remote sensing for archaeological surveying of northern landscapes using airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) and satellite and aerial images to map archaeological features as a basis for (a) assessing the pros and cons of the different approaches and (b) assessing the potential detection rate of remote sensing. Interpretation of images and a LiDAR-based bare-earth digital terrain model (DTM) was based on visual analyses aided by processing and visualizing techniques. 368 features were identified in the aerial images, 437 in the satellite images and 1186 in the DTM. LiDAR yielded the better result, especially for hunting pits. Image data proved suitable for dwellings and settlement sites. Feature characteristics proved a key factor for detectability, both in LiDAR and image data. This study has shown that LiDAR and remote sensing image data are highly applicable for archaeological surveying in northern landscapes. It showed that a multi-sensor approach contributes to high detection rates. Our results have improved the inventory of archaeological sites in a non-destructive and minimally invasive manner. cultural heritage; LiDAR; satellite image; aerial image; High North Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Subarctic RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Arctic |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) |
op_collection_id |
ftrepec |
language |
unknown |
description |
What can remote sensing contribute to archaeological surveying in subarctic and arctic landscapes? The pros and cons of remote sensing data vary as do areas of utilization and methodological approaches. We assessed the applicability of remote sensing for archaeological surveying of northern landscapes using airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) and satellite and aerial images to map archaeological features as a basis for (a) assessing the pros and cons of the different approaches and (b) assessing the potential detection rate of remote sensing. Interpretation of images and a LiDAR-based bare-earth digital terrain model (DTM) was based on visual analyses aided by processing and visualizing techniques. 368 features were identified in the aerial images, 437 in the satellite images and 1186 in the DTM. LiDAR yielded the better result, especially for hunting pits. Image data proved suitable for dwellings and settlement sites. Feature characteristics proved a key factor for detectability, both in LiDAR and image data. This study has shown that LiDAR and remote sensing image data are highly applicable for archaeological surveying in northern landscapes. It showed that a multi-sensor approach contributes to high detection rates. Our results have improved the inventory of archaeological sites in a non-destructive and minimally invasive manner. cultural heritage; LiDAR; satellite image; aerial image; High North |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Alma Elizabeth Thuestad Ole Risbøl Jan Ingolf Kleppe Stine Barlindhaug Elin Rose Myrvoll |
spellingShingle |
Alma Elizabeth Thuestad Ole Risbøl Jan Ingolf Kleppe Stine Barlindhaug Elin Rose Myrvoll Archaeological Surveying of Subarctic and Arctic Landscapes: Comparing the Performance of Airborne Laser Scanning and Remote Sensing Image Data |
author_facet |
Alma Elizabeth Thuestad Ole Risbøl Jan Ingolf Kleppe Stine Barlindhaug Elin Rose Myrvoll |
author_sort |
Alma Elizabeth Thuestad |
title |
Archaeological Surveying of Subarctic and Arctic Landscapes: Comparing the Performance of Airborne Laser Scanning and Remote Sensing Image Data |
title_short |
Archaeological Surveying of Subarctic and Arctic Landscapes: Comparing the Performance of Airborne Laser Scanning and Remote Sensing Image Data |
title_full |
Archaeological Surveying of Subarctic and Arctic Landscapes: Comparing the Performance of Airborne Laser Scanning and Remote Sensing Image Data |
title_fullStr |
Archaeological Surveying of Subarctic and Arctic Landscapes: Comparing the Performance of Airborne Laser Scanning and Remote Sensing Image Data |
title_full_unstemmed |
Archaeological Surveying of Subarctic and Arctic Landscapes: Comparing the Performance of Airborne Laser Scanning and Remote Sensing Image Data |
title_sort |
archaeological surveying of subarctic and arctic landscapes: comparing the performance of airborne laser scanning and remote sensing image data |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/ |
geographic |
Arctic |
geographic_facet |
Arctic |
genre |
Arctic Subarctic |
genre_facet |
Arctic Subarctic |
op_relation |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/ |
_version_ |
1796304882960957440 |