The ‘Cod-Multiple’: Modes of Existence of Fish, Science and People

Fish represent a politically regulated, scientifically researched, industrially processed, commercially marketed and socially contested living marine resource. Related to this, the incorporation of resource users and stakeholders into fisheries management is particularly important. Such involvement...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heike Schwermer, Alexandra M. Blöcker, Christian Möllmann, Martin Döring
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12229/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12229/
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12229-:d:673049
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12229-:d:673049 2024-04-14T08:11:52+00:00 The ‘Cod-Multiple’: Modes of Existence of Fish, Science and People Heike Schwermer Alexandra M. Blöcker Christian Möllmann Martin Döring https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12229/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12229/ unknown https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12229/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12229/ article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:41:51Z Fish represent a politically regulated, scientifically researched, industrially processed, commercially marketed and socially contested living marine resource. Related to this, the incorporation of resource users and stakeholders into fisheries management is particularly important. Such involvement has recently improved in terms of frequency, but institutional frameworks often result in a lack of recognition and integration of the diverse ‘knowledges’ of stakeholders involved. Against this background, we aim to uncover the potentials of additional knowledge types for management purposes, paving the way toward a more collaborative management. We first conducted qualitative expert interviews with different stakeholder groups (e.g., commercial fisheries, eNGO and administration) to map various ‘knowledges’ about cod ( Gadus morhua ), a major resource species in the Western Baltic Sea to reveal the various experiences and epistemologies revolving around it. The second analytical step consisted of examining how these ‘knowledges’ structure, inform and often enter into conflict with perspectives on and assessments of fisheries management. Potentials were identified regarding enhanced stakeholder engagement in management processes that provide food for thought to seek change in sustainable management of fish stocks in the future. Our study is a pointer to the need to transform fisheries management in a more social and participatory way. We argue that sustainable natural resource management cannot be designed solely by integrating more ‘knowledges’ (knowledge sharing) but requires the creation of social contexts and institutions with stakeholder empowerment at the local level (power sharing) to sustainably manage natural resources such as commercially importance fish stocks. Baltic Sea; fisheries management; cod; stakeholder participation; interviews; knowledge types; qualitative content analysis; co-management Article in Journal/Newspaper Gadus morhua RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Fish represent a politically regulated, scientifically researched, industrially processed, commercially marketed and socially contested living marine resource. Related to this, the incorporation of resource users and stakeholders into fisheries management is particularly important. Such involvement has recently improved in terms of frequency, but institutional frameworks often result in a lack of recognition and integration of the diverse ‘knowledges’ of stakeholders involved. Against this background, we aim to uncover the potentials of additional knowledge types for management purposes, paving the way toward a more collaborative management. We first conducted qualitative expert interviews with different stakeholder groups (e.g., commercial fisheries, eNGO and administration) to map various ‘knowledges’ about cod ( Gadus morhua ), a major resource species in the Western Baltic Sea to reveal the various experiences and epistemologies revolving around it. The second analytical step consisted of examining how these ‘knowledges’ structure, inform and often enter into conflict with perspectives on and assessments of fisheries management. Potentials were identified regarding enhanced stakeholder engagement in management processes that provide food for thought to seek change in sustainable management of fish stocks in the future. Our study is a pointer to the need to transform fisheries management in a more social and participatory way. We argue that sustainable natural resource management cannot be designed solely by integrating more ‘knowledges’ (knowledge sharing) but requires the creation of social contexts and institutions with stakeholder empowerment at the local level (power sharing) to sustainably manage natural resources such as commercially importance fish stocks. Baltic Sea; fisheries management; cod; stakeholder participation; interviews; knowledge types; qualitative content analysis; co-management
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Heike Schwermer
Alexandra M. Blöcker
Christian Möllmann
Martin Döring
spellingShingle Heike Schwermer
Alexandra M. Blöcker
Christian Möllmann
Martin Döring
The ‘Cod-Multiple’: Modes of Existence of Fish, Science and People
author_facet Heike Schwermer
Alexandra M. Blöcker
Christian Möllmann
Martin Döring
author_sort Heike Schwermer
title The ‘Cod-Multiple’: Modes of Existence of Fish, Science and People
title_short The ‘Cod-Multiple’: Modes of Existence of Fish, Science and People
title_full The ‘Cod-Multiple’: Modes of Existence of Fish, Science and People
title_fullStr The ‘Cod-Multiple’: Modes of Existence of Fish, Science and People
title_full_unstemmed The ‘Cod-Multiple’: Modes of Existence of Fish, Science and People
title_sort ‘cod-multiple’: modes of existence of fish, science and people
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12229/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12229/
genre Gadus morhua
genre_facet Gadus morhua
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12229/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12229/
_version_ 1796309601623212032