A New Look at the Natural Capital Concept: Approaches, Structure, and Evaluation Procedure

This article considers the concept of natural capital as a basic construct of sustainable development. However, after numerous studies, a number of aspects of accounting and valuation of natural capital remain unspecified. The relevance and imperfection of the guidelines used to assess natural capit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Margarita Ignatyeva, Vera Yurak, Oksana Logvinenko
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9236/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9236/
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9236-:d:440967
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9236-:d:440967 2024-04-14T08:14:21+00:00 A New Look at the Natural Capital Concept: Approaches, Structure, and Evaluation Procedure Margarita Ignatyeva Vera Yurak Oksana Logvinenko https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9236/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9236/ unknown https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9236/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9236/ article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:37:15Z This article considers the concept of natural capital as a basic construct of sustainable development. However, after numerous studies, a number of aspects of accounting and valuation of natural capital remain unspecified. The relevance and imperfection of the guidelines used to assess natural capital make relevant the development of such issues as the conceptual apparatus and methods to natural capital assessment. Therefore, the core objectives of the paper are: (1) to substantiate the structure of natural capital, taking into account the natural resources and ecosystem approaches; (2) to clarify the concepts of “function” and “services” in relation to abiotic and biotic components of the environment; (3) to generalize and analyze the classifications of ecosystem services, and to develop the authors’ classification; (4) to identify the most common methods for the economic assessment of natural capital’s components, and to implement these methods within a specific territory. These methods have been tested on the Khanty–Mansi Autonomous Okrug (KhMAD, Russia). The most typical ecosystems of the region and their inherent ecosystem services have been identified. Assessment results are presented for (1) forest ecosystems, (2) mountain ecosystems, and (3) ecosystems of swamps, lakes, and rivers. natural capital; abiotic and biotic components; ecosystems; ecosystem services and functions; economic assessment Article in Journal/Newspaper khanty khanty-mansi Mansi RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description This article considers the concept of natural capital as a basic construct of sustainable development. However, after numerous studies, a number of aspects of accounting and valuation of natural capital remain unspecified. The relevance and imperfection of the guidelines used to assess natural capital make relevant the development of such issues as the conceptual apparatus and methods to natural capital assessment. Therefore, the core objectives of the paper are: (1) to substantiate the structure of natural capital, taking into account the natural resources and ecosystem approaches; (2) to clarify the concepts of “function” and “services” in relation to abiotic and biotic components of the environment; (3) to generalize and analyze the classifications of ecosystem services, and to develop the authors’ classification; (4) to identify the most common methods for the economic assessment of natural capital’s components, and to implement these methods within a specific territory. These methods have been tested on the Khanty–Mansi Autonomous Okrug (KhMAD, Russia). The most typical ecosystems of the region and their inherent ecosystem services have been identified. Assessment results are presented for (1) forest ecosystems, (2) mountain ecosystems, and (3) ecosystems of swamps, lakes, and rivers. natural capital; abiotic and biotic components; ecosystems; ecosystem services and functions; economic assessment
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Margarita Ignatyeva
Vera Yurak
Oksana Logvinenko
spellingShingle Margarita Ignatyeva
Vera Yurak
Oksana Logvinenko
A New Look at the Natural Capital Concept: Approaches, Structure, and Evaluation Procedure
author_facet Margarita Ignatyeva
Vera Yurak
Oksana Logvinenko
author_sort Margarita Ignatyeva
title A New Look at the Natural Capital Concept: Approaches, Structure, and Evaluation Procedure
title_short A New Look at the Natural Capital Concept: Approaches, Structure, and Evaluation Procedure
title_full A New Look at the Natural Capital Concept: Approaches, Structure, and Evaluation Procedure
title_fullStr A New Look at the Natural Capital Concept: Approaches, Structure, and Evaluation Procedure
title_full_unstemmed A New Look at the Natural Capital Concept: Approaches, Structure, and Evaluation Procedure
title_sort new look at the natural capital concept: approaches, structure, and evaluation procedure
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9236/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9236/
genre khanty
khanty-mansi
Mansi
genre_facet khanty
khanty-mansi
Mansi
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9236/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9236/
_version_ 1796312530121916416