Coexistence with Bears in Romania: A Local Community Perspective

In the modern context of the strict protection of large carnivores, the competition for resources between local community dwellers and these animals has become an important challenge for ensuring coexistence—the key for conservation success. To assess the perceptions of this intricate relationship,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Petru Tudor Stăncioiu, Ioan Dutcă, Marian Cristian Bălăcescu, Ștefan Vasile Ungurean
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7167/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7167/
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7167-:d:297987
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7167-:d:297987 2024-04-14T08:20:40+00:00 Coexistence with Bears in Romania: A Local Community Perspective Petru Tudor Stăncioiu Ioan Dutcă Marian Cristian Bălăcescu Ștefan Vasile Ungurean https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7167/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7167/ unknown https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7167/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7167/ article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:29:51Z In the modern context of the strict protection of large carnivores, the competition for resources between local community dwellers and these animals has become an important challenge for ensuring coexistence—the key for conservation success. To assess the perceptions of this intricate relationship, six local communities from Central Romania, located in areas with high-density brown bear ( Ursus arctos L.) population and frequent conflicts, were investigated. A large proportion of the respondents (69%) showed various forms of intolerance (e.g., relocation, punishment, or killing) towards aggressive bears. However, the cognitive evaluation score derived from the level of interaction with bears showed a non-significant ( p = 0.470) segregation by tolerance levels, suggesting that not only the tangible costs (direct damage) but rather the psychological costs of fear, danger, or risk are more important drivers of negative attitudes towards bears. Furthermore, the prevalent experienced emotions towards an inoffensive bear (fear, terror, and hate, which represent 73%) underline the general preference for living in “separate worlds”. This requires that bears should avoid humans and their settlements, a goal unlikely to be achieved under the current strict protection regime. Therefore, an alternative strategy that ensures mutual avoidance of the two players may be more appropriate for successful human–bear coexistence. competition; bear conservation; human–wildlife conflict; Romania; sustainable management; Ursus arctos Article in Journal/Newspaper Ursus arctos RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description In the modern context of the strict protection of large carnivores, the competition for resources between local community dwellers and these animals has become an important challenge for ensuring coexistence—the key for conservation success. To assess the perceptions of this intricate relationship, six local communities from Central Romania, located in areas with high-density brown bear ( Ursus arctos L.) population and frequent conflicts, were investigated. A large proportion of the respondents (69%) showed various forms of intolerance (e.g., relocation, punishment, or killing) towards aggressive bears. However, the cognitive evaluation score derived from the level of interaction with bears showed a non-significant ( p = 0.470) segregation by tolerance levels, suggesting that not only the tangible costs (direct damage) but rather the psychological costs of fear, danger, or risk are more important drivers of negative attitudes towards bears. Furthermore, the prevalent experienced emotions towards an inoffensive bear (fear, terror, and hate, which represent 73%) underline the general preference for living in “separate worlds”. This requires that bears should avoid humans and their settlements, a goal unlikely to be achieved under the current strict protection regime. Therefore, an alternative strategy that ensures mutual avoidance of the two players may be more appropriate for successful human–bear coexistence. competition; bear conservation; human–wildlife conflict; Romania; sustainable management; Ursus arctos
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Petru Tudor Stăncioiu
Ioan Dutcă
Marian Cristian Bălăcescu
Ștefan Vasile Ungurean
spellingShingle Petru Tudor Stăncioiu
Ioan Dutcă
Marian Cristian Bălăcescu
Ștefan Vasile Ungurean
Coexistence with Bears in Romania: A Local Community Perspective
author_facet Petru Tudor Stăncioiu
Ioan Dutcă
Marian Cristian Bălăcescu
Ștefan Vasile Ungurean
author_sort Petru Tudor Stăncioiu
title Coexistence with Bears in Romania: A Local Community Perspective
title_short Coexistence with Bears in Romania: A Local Community Perspective
title_full Coexistence with Bears in Romania: A Local Community Perspective
title_fullStr Coexistence with Bears in Romania: A Local Community Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Coexistence with Bears in Romania: A Local Community Perspective
title_sort coexistence with bears in romania: a local community perspective
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7167/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7167/
genre Ursus arctos
genre_facet Ursus arctos
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7167/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7167/
_version_ 1796299047226572800