Legal Instruments for Marine Sanctuary in the High Arctic

In response to heightened threat to Arctic marine biodiversity due to polar ice melt, the following paper seeks to use qualitative secondary research to analyze existing anthropogenic threat to Arctic marine life and to evaluate current efforts on the part of the Arctic Council to protect biodiversi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kathleen Morris, Kamrul Hossain
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/5/2/20/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/5/2/20/
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:5:y:2016:i:2:p:20-:d:69520
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:5:y:2016:i:2:p:20-:d:69520 2024-04-14T08:02:37+00:00 Legal Instruments for Marine Sanctuary in the High Arctic Kathleen Morris Kamrul Hossain https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/5/2/20/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/5/2/20/ unknown https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/5/2/20/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/5/2/20/ article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:30:00Z In response to heightened threat to Arctic marine biodiversity due to polar ice melt, the following paper seeks to use qualitative secondary research to analyze existing anthropogenic threat to Arctic marine life and to evaluate current efforts on the part of the Arctic Council to protect biodiversity through a network of state-created marine protected areas (MPAs). We conclude that the current method for MPA creation fails to offer adequate pathways for creation of MPAs in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ), the high seas which fall beyond individual countries’ exclusive economic zones (EEZs). Thus, our central research question is to determine what legal basis and mechanisms exist for the creation of MPAs in ABNJs, with particular focus on the Arctic marine environment. In keeping with The United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity’s (UNCBD) precautionary approach, along with specific rules embodied within The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), we find a basis for creation of MPAs in the ABNJ. The text evaluates findings from the Boulogne-sur-Mer international conference of 2011 to suggest that such MPA creation in ABNJ could be approached via four pathways: regional agreement, UNCLOS implementing agreement, UNCBD additional protocol, or an Arctic Sanctuary modeled on the Antarctic Treaty. While we explore all four options, we argue that, due to geopolitical constraints, a comprehensive regional agreement offers the best path to High Arctic MPA creation. Arctic; ABNJ; biodiversity; MPAs; Sanctuary; exclusive economic zone Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Council Arctic Law of the Sea RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Arctic Antarctic The Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description In response to heightened threat to Arctic marine biodiversity due to polar ice melt, the following paper seeks to use qualitative secondary research to analyze existing anthropogenic threat to Arctic marine life and to evaluate current efforts on the part of the Arctic Council to protect biodiversity through a network of state-created marine protected areas (MPAs). We conclude that the current method for MPA creation fails to offer adequate pathways for creation of MPAs in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ), the high seas which fall beyond individual countries’ exclusive economic zones (EEZs). Thus, our central research question is to determine what legal basis and mechanisms exist for the creation of MPAs in ABNJs, with particular focus on the Arctic marine environment. In keeping with The United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity’s (UNCBD) precautionary approach, along with specific rules embodied within The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), we find a basis for creation of MPAs in the ABNJ. The text evaluates findings from the Boulogne-sur-Mer international conference of 2011 to suggest that such MPA creation in ABNJ could be approached via four pathways: regional agreement, UNCLOS implementing agreement, UNCBD additional protocol, or an Arctic Sanctuary modeled on the Antarctic Treaty. While we explore all four options, we argue that, due to geopolitical constraints, a comprehensive regional agreement offers the best path to High Arctic MPA creation. Arctic; ABNJ; biodiversity; MPAs; Sanctuary; exclusive economic zone
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kathleen Morris
Kamrul Hossain
spellingShingle Kathleen Morris
Kamrul Hossain
Legal Instruments for Marine Sanctuary in the High Arctic
author_facet Kathleen Morris
Kamrul Hossain
author_sort Kathleen Morris
title Legal Instruments for Marine Sanctuary in the High Arctic
title_short Legal Instruments for Marine Sanctuary in the High Arctic
title_full Legal Instruments for Marine Sanctuary in the High Arctic
title_fullStr Legal Instruments for Marine Sanctuary in the High Arctic
title_full_unstemmed Legal Instruments for Marine Sanctuary in the High Arctic
title_sort legal instruments for marine sanctuary in the high arctic
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/5/2/20/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/5/2/20/
geographic Arctic
Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Arctic
Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic Council
Arctic
Law of the Sea
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic Council
Arctic
Law of the Sea
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/5/2/20/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/5/2/20/
_version_ 1796316214355558400