Co-Management of Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis of Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland

Land allocated to protected areas (PA) is expanding as are expectations about the services these areas deliver. There is a need to advance knowledge on PA governance systems, like co-management, recognising that there is no “one-size-fits-all” solution. We analyse the co-management governance system...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jon Geir Petursson, Dadi Mar Kristofersson
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/681/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/681/
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:7:p:681-:d:583586
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:7:p:681-:d:583586 2024-04-14T08:13:30+00:00 Co-Management of Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis of Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland Jon Geir Petursson Dadi Mar Kristofersson https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/681/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/681/ unknown https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/681/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/681/ article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:41:32Z Land allocated to protected areas (PA) is expanding as are expectations about the services these areas deliver. There is a need to advance knowledge on PA governance systems, like co-management, recognising that there is no “one-size-fits-all” solution. We analyse the co-management governance system and performance of Vatnajökull National Park (VNP), Iceland. We adapt an analytical framework from the literature on environmental governance and analyse its governance system, hence actor roles, institutional arrangements and interactions. Our findings illustrate that the co-management structure was an outcome of political negotiations and a response to the lack of legitimacy of its predecessors; resulting in a tailor-made governance system set out in park-specific legislation. Although the performance is quite positive, being adaptive to changes, inclusive, promoting rural development and an appreciated facilitator of devolution and power-sharing, it has come with challenges. It has encountered problems delineating responsibilities among its actors, causing conflict and confusion; in settling conflicting localised issues close to local stakeholders, there have been capacity issues. We argue that the VNP co-management system is fit for its purpose, aligned with Icelandic land-use governance structures but in need of systematic improvements. There are important lessons as Iceland seeks to expand its PA estate and beyond, since the global community is setting ambitious policy goals to expand site-based conservation. co-management; protected areas; rural development; governance system; legitimacy; Vatnajökull National Park; Iceland Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Vatnajökull RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Vatnajökull ENVELOPE(-16.823,-16.823,64.420,64.420)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Land allocated to protected areas (PA) is expanding as are expectations about the services these areas deliver. There is a need to advance knowledge on PA governance systems, like co-management, recognising that there is no “one-size-fits-all” solution. We analyse the co-management governance system and performance of Vatnajökull National Park (VNP), Iceland. We adapt an analytical framework from the literature on environmental governance and analyse its governance system, hence actor roles, institutional arrangements and interactions. Our findings illustrate that the co-management structure was an outcome of political negotiations and a response to the lack of legitimacy of its predecessors; resulting in a tailor-made governance system set out in park-specific legislation. Although the performance is quite positive, being adaptive to changes, inclusive, promoting rural development and an appreciated facilitator of devolution and power-sharing, it has come with challenges. It has encountered problems delineating responsibilities among its actors, causing conflict and confusion; in settling conflicting localised issues close to local stakeholders, there have been capacity issues. We argue that the VNP co-management system is fit for its purpose, aligned with Icelandic land-use governance structures but in need of systematic improvements. There are important lessons as Iceland seeks to expand its PA estate and beyond, since the global community is setting ambitious policy goals to expand site-based conservation. co-management; protected areas; rural development; governance system; legitimacy; Vatnajökull National Park; Iceland
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jon Geir Petursson
Dadi Mar Kristofersson
spellingShingle Jon Geir Petursson
Dadi Mar Kristofersson
Co-Management of Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis of Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland
author_facet Jon Geir Petursson
Dadi Mar Kristofersson
author_sort Jon Geir Petursson
title Co-Management of Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis of Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland
title_short Co-Management of Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis of Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland
title_full Co-Management of Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis of Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland
title_fullStr Co-Management of Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis of Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland
title_full_unstemmed Co-Management of Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis of Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland
title_sort co-management of protected areas: a governance system analysis of vatnajökull national park, iceland
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/681/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/681/
long_lat ENVELOPE(-16.823,-16.823,64.420,64.420)
geographic Vatnajökull
geographic_facet Vatnajökull
genre Iceland
Vatnajökull
genre_facet Iceland
Vatnajökull
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/681/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/681/
_version_ 1796311505815207936