Enhanced CH 4 -CO 2 Hydrate Swapping in the Presence of Low Dosage Methanol

CO 2 -rich gas injection into natural gas hydrate reservoirs is proposed as a carbon-neutral, novel technique to store CO 2 while simultaneously producing CH 4 gas from methane hydrate deposits without disturbing geological settings. This method is limited by the mass transport barrier created by hy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jyoti Shanker Pandey, Charilaos Karantonidis, Adam Paul Karcz, Nicolas von Solms
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5238/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5238/
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:20:p:5238-:d:425099
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:20:p:5238-:d:425099 2023-05-15T17:12:01+02:00 Enhanced CH 4 -CO 2 Hydrate Swapping in the Presence of Low Dosage Methanol Jyoti Shanker Pandey Charilaos Karantonidis Adam Paul Karcz Nicolas von Solms https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5238/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5238/ unknown https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5238/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5238/ article ftrepec 2020-12-04T13:43:39Z CO 2 -rich gas injection into natural gas hydrate reservoirs is proposed as a carbon-neutral, novel technique to store CO 2 while simultaneously producing CH 4 gas from methane hydrate deposits without disturbing geological settings. This method is limited by the mass transport barrier created by hydrate film formation at the liquid–gas interface. The very low gas diffusivity through hydrate film formed at this interface causes low CO 2 availability at the gas–hydrate interface, thus lowering the recovery and replacement efficiency during CH 4 -CO 2 exchange. In a first-of-its-kind study, we have demonstrate the successful application of low dosage methanol to enhance gas storage and recovery and compare it with water and other surface-active kinetic promoters including SDS and L-methionine. Our study shows 40–80% CH 4 recovery, 83–93% CO 2 storage and 3–10% CH 4 -CO 2 replacement efficiency in the presence of 5 wt% methanol, and further improvement in the swapping process due to a change in temperature from 1–4 °C is observed. We also discuss the influence of initial water saturation (30–66%), hydrate morphology (grain-coating and pore-filling) and hydrate surface area on the CH 4 -CO 2 hydrate swapping. Very distinctive behavior in methane recovery caused by initial water saturation (above and below S wi = 0.35) and hydrate morphology is also discussed. Improved CO 2 storage and methane recovery in the presence of methanol is attributed to its dual role as anti-agglomerate and thermodynamic driving force enhancer between CH 4 -CO 2 hydrate phase boundaries when methanol is used at a low concentration (5 wt%). The findings of this study can be useful in exploring the usage of low dosage, bio-friendly, anti-agglomerate and hydrate inhibition compounds in improving CH 4 recovery and storing CO 2 in hydrate reservoirs without disturbing geological formation. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first experimental study to explore the novel application of an anti-agglomerate and hydrate inhibitor in low dosage to address the CO 2 hydrate mass transfer barrier created at the gas–liquid interface to enhance CH 4 -CO 2 hydrate exchange. Our study also highlights the importance of prior information about methane hydrate reservoirs, such as residual water saturation, degree of hydrate saturation and hydrate morphology, before applying the CH 4 -CO 2 hydrate swapping technique. CH 4 -CO 2 hydrate swapping; anti-agglomeration; methanol; surface active compound Article in Journal/Newspaper Methane hydrate RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description CO 2 -rich gas injection into natural gas hydrate reservoirs is proposed as a carbon-neutral, novel technique to store CO 2 while simultaneously producing CH 4 gas from methane hydrate deposits without disturbing geological settings. This method is limited by the mass transport barrier created by hydrate film formation at the liquid–gas interface. The very low gas diffusivity through hydrate film formed at this interface causes low CO 2 availability at the gas–hydrate interface, thus lowering the recovery and replacement efficiency during CH 4 -CO 2 exchange. In a first-of-its-kind study, we have demonstrate the successful application of low dosage methanol to enhance gas storage and recovery and compare it with water and other surface-active kinetic promoters including SDS and L-methionine. Our study shows 40–80% CH 4 recovery, 83–93% CO 2 storage and 3–10% CH 4 -CO 2 replacement efficiency in the presence of 5 wt% methanol, and further improvement in the swapping process due to a change in temperature from 1–4 °C is observed. We also discuss the influence of initial water saturation (30–66%), hydrate morphology (grain-coating and pore-filling) and hydrate surface area on the CH 4 -CO 2 hydrate swapping. Very distinctive behavior in methane recovery caused by initial water saturation (above and below S wi = 0.35) and hydrate morphology is also discussed. Improved CO 2 storage and methane recovery in the presence of methanol is attributed to its dual role as anti-agglomerate and thermodynamic driving force enhancer between CH 4 -CO 2 hydrate phase boundaries when methanol is used at a low concentration (5 wt%). The findings of this study can be useful in exploring the usage of low dosage, bio-friendly, anti-agglomerate and hydrate inhibition compounds in improving CH 4 recovery and storing CO 2 in hydrate reservoirs without disturbing geological formation. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first experimental study to explore the novel application of an anti-agglomerate and hydrate inhibitor in low dosage to address the CO 2 hydrate mass transfer barrier created at the gas–liquid interface to enhance CH 4 -CO 2 hydrate exchange. Our study also highlights the importance of prior information about methane hydrate reservoirs, such as residual water saturation, degree of hydrate saturation and hydrate morphology, before applying the CH 4 -CO 2 hydrate swapping technique. CH 4 -CO 2 hydrate swapping; anti-agglomeration; methanol; surface active compound
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jyoti Shanker Pandey
Charilaos Karantonidis
Adam Paul Karcz
Nicolas von Solms
spellingShingle Jyoti Shanker Pandey
Charilaos Karantonidis
Adam Paul Karcz
Nicolas von Solms
Enhanced CH 4 -CO 2 Hydrate Swapping in the Presence of Low Dosage Methanol
author_facet Jyoti Shanker Pandey
Charilaos Karantonidis
Adam Paul Karcz
Nicolas von Solms
author_sort Jyoti Shanker Pandey
title Enhanced CH 4 -CO 2 Hydrate Swapping in the Presence of Low Dosage Methanol
title_short Enhanced CH 4 -CO 2 Hydrate Swapping in the Presence of Low Dosage Methanol
title_full Enhanced CH 4 -CO 2 Hydrate Swapping in the Presence of Low Dosage Methanol
title_fullStr Enhanced CH 4 -CO 2 Hydrate Swapping in the Presence of Low Dosage Methanol
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced CH 4 -CO 2 Hydrate Swapping in the Presence of Low Dosage Methanol
title_sort enhanced ch 4 -co 2 hydrate swapping in the presence of low dosage methanol
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5238/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5238/
genre Methane hydrate
genre_facet Methane hydrate
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5238/pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5238/
_version_ 1766068779795611648