Public Expenditure in Regions: Current State and Problems (Exemplified by Registries of Expenditure Commitments of the Regions in the Russian Far East)

Exemplified by regions of the Russian Far East, the article presents a view on the current state and problems of managing regional public expenditures, including the focus of public expenditure on regional development. The research is based on the data from expenditure commitments registries in 2019...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elena B. Veprikova, Aleksei A. Novitskii
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.finjournal-nifi.ru/images/FILES/Journal/Archive/2021/6/statii/06_6_2021_v13.pdf
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:fru:finjrn:210606:p:117-131
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:fru:finjrn:210606:p:117-131 2024-04-14T08:14:12+00:00 Public Expenditure in Regions: Current State and Problems (Exemplified by Registries of Expenditure Commitments of the Regions in the Russian Far East) Elena B. Veprikova Aleksei A. Novitskii https://www.finjournal-nifi.ru/images/FILES/Journal/Archive/2021/6/statii/06_6_2021_v13.pdf unknown https://www.finjournal-nifi.ru/images/FILES/Journal/Archive/2021/6/statii/06_6_2021_v13.pdf article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:41:54Z Exemplified by regions of the Russian Far East, the article presents a view on the current state and problems of managing regional public expenditures, including the focus of public expenditure on regional development. The research is based on the data from expenditure commitments registries in 2019. A major share of budget expenditures is “compulsory” (pre-determined) expenditures, which have limited flexibility and cannot be redirected to different purposes. Under these circumstances, the ability of regional governments to vary the direction of budget spending and finance self-initiated expenditure commitments—in other words, to independently manage the composition of expenditures—is kept to a minimum, which implies low autonomy in managing expenditures. Most of the Russian Far Eastern regions’ government expenditures are aimed at supporting the current volume and quality of public services. The share of developmental expenditures is higher in regions having more budget resources (Sakhalin Oblast), and significantly lower in regions of the northern Far East (Magadan Oblast, Kamchatka Krai, and Sakha Republic (Yakutia)), the latter having higher costs of supporting critical infrastructure under severe climate conditions. In the present situation, regional governments cannot be fully considered as key influencers managing the development of their territories, and only fill the role of executors and lobbying actors for acquiring financial support from the federal government. As a result, it is difficult to account for specific territorial circumstances and development potential, and the overall efficiency of government spending is decreased. In the authors’ opinion, the findings may be applicable to most regions in the Russian Federation. government spending, expenditure commitments, regional development, expenditure commitments registry, compulsory expenditures, initiative expenditures, developmental expenditures, microregion Article in Journal/Newspaper Kamchatka Sakha Republic Sakhalin Yakutia RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Sakha Magadan ENVELOPE(150.803,150.803,59.564,59.564) Kamchatka Krai ENVELOPE(159.000,159.000,55.000,55.000)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Exemplified by regions of the Russian Far East, the article presents a view on the current state and problems of managing regional public expenditures, including the focus of public expenditure on regional development. The research is based on the data from expenditure commitments registries in 2019. A major share of budget expenditures is “compulsory” (pre-determined) expenditures, which have limited flexibility and cannot be redirected to different purposes. Under these circumstances, the ability of regional governments to vary the direction of budget spending and finance self-initiated expenditure commitments—in other words, to independently manage the composition of expenditures—is kept to a minimum, which implies low autonomy in managing expenditures. Most of the Russian Far Eastern regions’ government expenditures are aimed at supporting the current volume and quality of public services. The share of developmental expenditures is higher in regions having more budget resources (Sakhalin Oblast), and significantly lower in regions of the northern Far East (Magadan Oblast, Kamchatka Krai, and Sakha Republic (Yakutia)), the latter having higher costs of supporting critical infrastructure under severe climate conditions. In the present situation, regional governments cannot be fully considered as key influencers managing the development of their territories, and only fill the role of executors and lobbying actors for acquiring financial support from the federal government. As a result, it is difficult to account for specific territorial circumstances and development potential, and the overall efficiency of government spending is decreased. In the authors’ opinion, the findings may be applicable to most regions in the Russian Federation. government spending, expenditure commitments, regional development, expenditure commitments registry, compulsory expenditures, initiative expenditures, developmental expenditures, microregion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Elena B. Veprikova
Aleksei A. Novitskii
spellingShingle Elena B. Veprikova
Aleksei A. Novitskii
Public Expenditure in Regions: Current State and Problems (Exemplified by Registries of Expenditure Commitments of the Regions in the Russian Far East)
author_facet Elena B. Veprikova
Aleksei A. Novitskii
author_sort Elena B. Veprikova
title Public Expenditure in Regions: Current State and Problems (Exemplified by Registries of Expenditure Commitments of the Regions in the Russian Far East)
title_short Public Expenditure in Regions: Current State and Problems (Exemplified by Registries of Expenditure Commitments of the Regions in the Russian Far East)
title_full Public Expenditure in Regions: Current State and Problems (Exemplified by Registries of Expenditure Commitments of the Regions in the Russian Far East)
title_fullStr Public Expenditure in Regions: Current State and Problems (Exemplified by Registries of Expenditure Commitments of the Regions in the Russian Far East)
title_full_unstemmed Public Expenditure in Regions: Current State and Problems (Exemplified by Registries of Expenditure Commitments of the Regions in the Russian Far East)
title_sort public expenditure in regions: current state and problems (exemplified by registries of expenditure commitments of the regions in the russian far east)
url https://www.finjournal-nifi.ru/images/FILES/Journal/Archive/2021/6/statii/06_6_2021_v13.pdf
long_lat ENVELOPE(150.803,150.803,59.564,59.564)
ENVELOPE(159.000,159.000,55.000,55.000)
geographic Sakha
Magadan
Kamchatka Krai
geographic_facet Sakha
Magadan
Kamchatka Krai
genre Kamchatka
Sakha Republic
Sakhalin
Yakutia
genre_facet Kamchatka
Sakha Republic
Sakhalin
Yakutia
op_relation https://www.finjournal-nifi.ru/images/FILES/Journal/Archive/2021/6/statii/06_6_2021_v13.pdf
_version_ 1796312337531011072