Changes to administrative controls in banks after the financial crisis

Purpose - This paper aims to explore and explain how administrative controls have been changed as a response to a significant crisis, using the transition of the three largest Icelandic banks from bankrupt to operational entities after the 2008 financial crisis. The Icelandic banks are compared with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leif Christensen, Pall Rikhardsson, Carsten Rohde, Catherine Elisabet Batt
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/QRAM-12-2016-0088?utm_campaign=RePEc&WT.mc_id=RePEc
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:eme:qrampp:qram-12-2016-0088
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:eme:qrampp:qram-12-2016-0088 2024-04-14T08:13:50+00:00 Changes to administrative controls in banks after the financial crisis Leif Christensen Pall Rikhardsson Carsten Rohde Catherine Elisabet Batt http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/QRAM-12-2016-0088?utm_campaign=RePEc&WT.mc_id=RePEc unknown http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/QRAM-12-2016-0088?utm_campaign=RePEc&WT.mc_id=RePEc article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:38:00Z Purpose - This paper aims to explore and explain how administrative controls have been changed as a response to a significant crisis, using the transition of the three largest Icelandic banks from bankrupt to operational entities after the 2008 financial crisis. The Icelandic banks are compared with three Danish banks to separate crisis-driven responses from simple market-driven reactions. Design/methodology/approach - Empirical data were collected using semi-structured interviews. The participating Icelandic and Danish banks were considered as two units, which formed the basis for a comparative case study between the two countries. Findings - Driven by an understanding of what is expected by the market rather than the need to inform and guide the employees the Icelandic banks implemented a number of revolutionary and formally documented changes. These changes included significant bigger risk management functions and policies and procedures documenting “everything”. However, in both countries, it seems that new values supported by the “tone at the top”, areas with limited formal documentation, are the most important management tools. Research limitations/implications - The study relies on interviews with employees, and the actual changes of administrative controls have not been reviewed. The most important implication is that the situated logics in Iceland driven by external institutional pressure initiated a revolutionary implementation of values bypassing existing routines and formalised rules. Originality/value - Although the use of management controls has been studied intensively, detailed studies of the banking sector have been lacking. Furthermore, there is limited knowledge of how administrative controls changed in response to the financial crisis. Financial crisis, Management controls, Administrative controls Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Purpose - This paper aims to explore and explain how administrative controls have been changed as a response to a significant crisis, using the transition of the three largest Icelandic banks from bankrupt to operational entities after the 2008 financial crisis. The Icelandic banks are compared with three Danish banks to separate crisis-driven responses from simple market-driven reactions. Design/methodology/approach - Empirical data were collected using semi-structured interviews. The participating Icelandic and Danish banks were considered as two units, which formed the basis for a comparative case study between the two countries. Findings - Driven by an understanding of what is expected by the market rather than the need to inform and guide the employees the Icelandic banks implemented a number of revolutionary and formally documented changes. These changes included significant bigger risk management functions and policies and procedures documenting “everything”. However, in both countries, it seems that new values supported by the “tone at the top”, areas with limited formal documentation, are the most important management tools. Research limitations/implications - The study relies on interviews with employees, and the actual changes of administrative controls have not been reviewed. The most important implication is that the situated logics in Iceland driven by external institutional pressure initiated a revolutionary implementation of values bypassing existing routines and formalised rules. Originality/value - Although the use of management controls has been studied intensively, detailed studies of the banking sector have been lacking. Furthermore, there is limited knowledge of how administrative controls changed in response to the financial crisis. Financial crisis, Management controls, Administrative controls
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Leif Christensen
Pall Rikhardsson
Carsten Rohde
Catherine Elisabet Batt
spellingShingle Leif Christensen
Pall Rikhardsson
Carsten Rohde
Catherine Elisabet Batt
Changes to administrative controls in banks after the financial crisis
author_facet Leif Christensen
Pall Rikhardsson
Carsten Rohde
Catherine Elisabet Batt
author_sort Leif Christensen
title Changes to administrative controls in banks after the financial crisis
title_short Changes to administrative controls in banks after the financial crisis
title_full Changes to administrative controls in banks after the financial crisis
title_fullStr Changes to administrative controls in banks after the financial crisis
title_full_unstemmed Changes to administrative controls in banks after the financial crisis
title_sort changes to administrative controls in banks after the financial crisis
url http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/QRAM-12-2016-0088?utm_campaign=RePEc&WT.mc_id=RePEc
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/QRAM-12-2016-0088?utm_campaign=RePEc&WT.mc_id=RePEc
_version_ 1796311914022699008