Techno-economic and environmental assessments of storing woodchips and pellets for bioenergy applications

Storage is the critical operation within the biomass supply chain to reduce feedstock supply risks and to manage smooth year-around operations of a biorefinery or a bioenergy plant. This paper analyzed the economic and environmental impacts of four different biomass storage systems for woodchips (Ou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sahoo, Kamalakanta, Bilek, E.M. (Ted), Mani, Sudhagar
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
DML
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118306397
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:eee:rensus:v:98:y:2018:i:c:p:27-39
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:eee:rensus:v:98:y:2018:i:c:p:27-39 2024-04-14T08:10:55+00:00 Techno-economic and environmental assessments of storing woodchips and pellets for bioenergy applications Sahoo, Kamalakanta Bilek, E.M. (Ted) Mani, Sudhagar http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118306397 unknown http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118306397 article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:30:17Z Storage is the critical operation within the biomass supply chain to reduce feedstock supply risks and to manage smooth year-around operations of a biorefinery or a bioenergy plant. This paper analyzed the economic and environmental impacts of four different biomass storage systems for woodchips (Outdoor-open, Outdoor-tarped, Indoor, and Silo) and two systems for pellets (Indoor and Silo). Storage cost includes the costs for handling (including ventilation in case of silo storage), infrastructure investment, and dry matter loss (DML) for each system. The estimation of total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions includes the fugitive emissions from storage piles and emissions due to electricity and fuel consumption for each system. Among four storage systems, the outdoor-tarped ($15.0 ODMT−1, ODMT: Oven Dry Metric Ton) and silo ($5.8 ODMT−1) storage were the least-cost options for woodchips and pellets respectively. However, silo-storage could be the most promising option for storing woodchips ($5.8 ODMT−1) and pellets ($2.3 ODMT−1), if it is used for short-term (two months) and frequently (at least six times) in a year. The total GHG emissions for six-month storage were 2.8–11.8 kgCO2e ODMT−1 for woodchips and 8.6–42.0 kgCO2e ODMT−1 for pellets. During Outdoor-open storage, the lower heating value of woodchips could drop to 37% due to increased dry-matter loss (DML) and moisture content. The initial moisture content, bulk density, DML, and resource required during handling were the most sensitive parameters influenced the storage performances of both woodchips and pellets. This study has demonstrated that a combination of different storage options along the supply chain could reduce the total biomass storage cost for a biorefinery or power plant. Bioenergy; Woodchips; Pellets; Storage methods; Techno-economic analysis; Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; Article in Journal/Newspaper DML RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Storage is the critical operation within the biomass supply chain to reduce feedstock supply risks and to manage smooth year-around operations of a biorefinery or a bioenergy plant. This paper analyzed the economic and environmental impacts of four different biomass storage systems for woodchips (Outdoor-open, Outdoor-tarped, Indoor, and Silo) and two systems for pellets (Indoor and Silo). Storage cost includes the costs for handling (including ventilation in case of silo storage), infrastructure investment, and dry matter loss (DML) for each system. The estimation of total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions includes the fugitive emissions from storage piles and emissions due to electricity and fuel consumption for each system. Among four storage systems, the outdoor-tarped ($15.0 ODMT−1, ODMT: Oven Dry Metric Ton) and silo ($5.8 ODMT−1) storage were the least-cost options for woodchips and pellets respectively. However, silo-storage could be the most promising option for storing woodchips ($5.8 ODMT−1) and pellets ($2.3 ODMT−1), if it is used for short-term (two months) and frequently (at least six times) in a year. The total GHG emissions for six-month storage were 2.8–11.8 kgCO2e ODMT−1 for woodchips and 8.6–42.0 kgCO2e ODMT−1 for pellets. During Outdoor-open storage, the lower heating value of woodchips could drop to 37% due to increased dry-matter loss (DML) and moisture content. The initial moisture content, bulk density, DML, and resource required during handling were the most sensitive parameters influenced the storage performances of both woodchips and pellets. This study has demonstrated that a combination of different storage options along the supply chain could reduce the total biomass storage cost for a biorefinery or power plant. Bioenergy; Woodchips; Pellets; Storage methods; Techno-economic analysis; Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions;
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Sahoo, Kamalakanta
Bilek, E.M. (Ted)
Mani, Sudhagar
spellingShingle Sahoo, Kamalakanta
Bilek, E.M. (Ted)
Mani, Sudhagar
Techno-economic and environmental assessments of storing woodchips and pellets for bioenergy applications
author_facet Sahoo, Kamalakanta
Bilek, E.M. (Ted)
Mani, Sudhagar
author_sort Sahoo, Kamalakanta
title Techno-economic and environmental assessments of storing woodchips and pellets for bioenergy applications
title_short Techno-economic and environmental assessments of storing woodchips and pellets for bioenergy applications
title_full Techno-economic and environmental assessments of storing woodchips and pellets for bioenergy applications
title_fullStr Techno-economic and environmental assessments of storing woodchips and pellets for bioenergy applications
title_full_unstemmed Techno-economic and environmental assessments of storing woodchips and pellets for bioenergy applications
title_sort techno-economic and environmental assessments of storing woodchips and pellets for bioenergy applications
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118306397
genre DML
genre_facet DML
op_relation http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118306397
_version_ 1796308581007491072